213 / 272
TAR NC Implementation Document – Second Edition September 2017 |
213
Annex G
Article 10(3) – Example of
Inter-TSO Compensation
Mechanism Application in
Multi-TSO Entry–Exit Systems
within a Member State
Policy choices for ITC derivation are not the topic of the example as the ITC mech-
anism is subject to NRA decision. Article 10(3) of the TAR NC only gives general
principles for the ITC establishment, and no specific requirements to follow.
This Annex describes the case of an entry-exit system with two TSOs applying
jointly/separately the same RPM. Two examples of RPMs will be considered: postage
stamp and CWD. Before considering the multi-TSO case, it is useful to take the
benchmark situation where each TSO has a specific entry-exit system. In a second
step, the two entry-exit systems are merged.
Before the merger:
\\
Part I
presents the situation where the two TSOs apply separately the same
RPM in their own entry-exit system.
After the merger:
\\
Part II
considers the case where the two TSOs apply jointly the same RPM
after the merging of the two previous entry-exit systems into one.
\\
Part III
shows the case where the two TSOs apply separately the same RPM
after the merging into one entry-exit system.