Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  60 / 272 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 60 / 272 Next Page
Page Background

60 |

TAR NC Implementation Document – Second Edition September 2017

ARTICLE 7 CHOICE OF A REFERENCE PRICE

METHODOLOGY

Responsibility: subject to consultation per Article 26(1) by TSO/NRA, as NRA

decides; subject to decision by NRA; ACER analysis of the consultation docu-

ment for Article 7

TSOs/NRAs have to ensure compliance with five principles when evaluating a cer-

tain RPM:

\\

Reproducibility:

network users should know the methodology to derive tariffs,

should be able to reproduce the tariff calculations and should have the ability

to forecast tariff developments over time.

\\

Cost-reflectivity:

tariffs should reflect the costs incurred by the TSO.

\\

Non-discrimination:

means that to the extent possible, TSOs/NRAs, depend-

ing on the entity conducting the final consultation per Article 26(1), should

avoid cross-subsidies where some network users pay for others. The assess-

ments set out for the CAA test the satisfaction of this principle. ENTSOG

received stakeholder feedback highlighting that, whilst the CAA tests the satis-

faction of the cost-reflectivity principle, this is not an exclusive test of whether

the RPM ‘ensures non-discrimination’. CAA checks the non-discrimination only

between the two predefined groups of network users, and there could be other

means to check non-discrimination between other groups of network users.

ENTSOG agrees with this clarification.

\\

Volume risk management:

one group such as intra-system network users

should not face tariff hikes to compensate for the diminishing use of the network

by another group such as cross-system network users. In Czech Republic, the

‘asset allocation methodology’ is applied to hedge against such volume risk: this

RPM is based on the distribution of assets between two groups of assets, one

operated by a price cap regime to supply cross-system use, the other operated

by a non-price cap regime to supply intra-system use. This approach notably

ensures that intra-system use does not have to make up for insufficient volumes

flowed for cross-system use.

\\

Non-distortion of cross-border trade

through reference prices implies that

reference prices derived in accordance with RPM should ensure non-distorted

economic signals for cross-border trade.

Enable reproductivity of

tariff calculation and

prevision of future tariffs

Ensure reference prices

do not distort

cross-border trade

Ensure significant volume

risk is not shifted from

cross-system to

intra-system use

Ensure non-discrimination

and prevent undue

cross-subsidisation

(incl. regarding c/a/a)

Take account of actual

costs of using the

transmission network

Figure 15:

Principles for the choice of a RPM