Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  591 / 1332 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 591 / 1332 Next Page
Page Background

Summary

• Modern intracavitary applicators

• Same concept as historical systems; main differences:

• CT, MRI compatibility, materials

• Fixed, adjustable components

• Smaller channel diameters

• I

ntracavitary technique alone:

• limited possibility for D adaptation

• Interstitial boost superior to EBRT boost

• Emerging technologies:

• Comprehensive applicator IC/IS (Vienna II type)

• 3D printing

Historical

Paris

Stockholm

Manchester

Fletcher

Modern

Stockholm

Manchester

& Fletcher

Mould

Limitations of

IC Applicators

Emerging

Technologies