Previous Page  205 / 266 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 205 / 266 Next Page
Page Background

Vol. 48

No. 4

August,

1954

THE GAZETTE

ofthe

INCORPORATED LAW SOCIETY OF IRELAND

President

J

oseph

B

arrett

Vice-Presidents

J

ohn

J. N

ash

J

ohn

R. H

alpin

Secretary

Etuc A.

P

lunkett

FOR CIRCULATION AMONG MEMBERS

MEETING OF THE COUNCIL.

22

nd

J

uly

: The President in the Chair. Also

present; Messrs. John J. Nash and John R. Halpin,

Vice-Presidents; Desmond J . Collins, John F.

1

Foley, Henry St. J. Blake, Denis Greene, Derrick

M. Martin, Patrick R. Boyd, Reginald J. Nolan,

John J. Sheil, Francis J. Lanigan, Ralph j. Walker,

James R. Quirke, Cornelius J. Daly, William J.

Norman, Francis J. Gearty, John Maher, Thomas

A. O’Reilly, James J. O’Connor, Joseph P. Tyrrell,

Desmond J. Mayne, George A. Nolan, Nathaniel

Lacy, Patrick F. O’Reilly, John Carrigan.

The following was among the business transacted :

Revised Scale o f Counsels’ Fees.

T

he

Council considered on a report from a Com­

mittee the revised scale o f Counsels’ fees in the

Circuit and District Courts published in the

Irish

Law Titties and Solicitors

Journal

o f 22nd May, and

decided to ask that the matter should be considered

by the joint Committee o f the Bar Council and the

Society.

Client’s Privilege.

A

m e m b e r

acted for a client who expected to be

summoned as a witness to give evidence for the

State against a person charged with fraudulent

conversion o f monies. Member who had knowledge

o f the facts in his professional capacity also expected

to be summoned as a witness. The client did not

wish that member should testify and member asked

whether in the opinion of th e ' Council he was

precluded from giving evidence by reason o f the

client’s privilege. The evidence required related

to the stamping o f a deed which had been given

to the accused for the purpose o f being stamped,

and which had afterwards been stamped by member.

The Council were o f opinion that on the facts stated,

no question o f privilege arose, but that member if

summoned to testify ought to raise the question

o f privilege for decision by the judge.

Solicitors’ Bill.

T

he

President reported that a deputation from the

Council had been received by An Taoiseach, as

acting Minister for Justice, and had submitted a

memorandum on various points outstanding between

the Department and the Society in connection with

27