Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  532 / 1084 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 532 / 1084 Next Page
Page Background

Post-induction therapy FDG PET

clinically useful in the selection of subsequent therapy?:

identify CR

avoid surgery

Outcomes of patients with esophageal cancer staged with [¹⁸F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET):

can postchemoradiotherapy FDG-PET predict the utility of resection? Monjazeb AM, Riedlinger G, Aklilu M, Geisinger KR,

Mishra G, Isom S, Clark P, Levine EA, Blackstock. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(31):4714

But: not confirmed in

Utility of (18)F-FDG PET for Predicting Histopathologic Response in Esophageal Carcinoma following Chemoradiation. Arnett

AL, Merrell KW, Macintosh EM, James SE, Nathan MA, Shen KR, Ravi K, Neben Wittich MA, Haddock MG, Hallemeier.

J Thorac Oncol. 2017 Jan;12(1):121-128

Identify non responders:

MUNICON study:metabolic responders had a significantly

better prognosis than did non responders

PET to assess early metabolic response and to guide treatment of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction: the

MUNICON phase II trial.AULordick F, Ott K, Krause BJ, Weber WA, Becker K, Stein HJ, Lorenzen S, Schuster T, Wieder H,

Herrmann K, Bredenkamp R, Höfler H, Fink U, Peschel C, Schwaiger M, Siewert JR SOLancet Oncol. 2007;8(9):797