Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  35 / 44 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 35 / 44 Next Page
Page Background

0

50 km

VALLETTA

Malta

Sicilia

Germany

United Kingdom

The Netherlands

Belgium

France

Ireland

Malta

Sweden

Spain

Slovenia

0

50

100

150

200

0

300 km

Number of illegal waste shipments

Number of breaches of custom regulations

(mostly incomplete data)

[

2

] : Belgium

[

1

] : The Netherlands

Participating ports

Mediterranean Sea

Baltic

Sea

North

Sea

Atlantic

Ocean

IMPEL Seaport project: a European initiative to control international waste shipments

Source: IMPEL-TFS Seaport Project II,

International cooperation in enforcement hitting illegal waste shipments

, 2006.

Between September 2004 and May 2006, international waste shipments

have been checked in the 30 European ports, combining custom documents checks

and physical inspections of containers and storage locations.

Germany

Latvia

Poland

Slovenia

Sweden

STOCKHOLM

GÖTHENBURG

RIGA

SÖDERTÄLJE

SOUTHAMPTON

FELIXSTOWE

THAMESPORT

LE HAVRE

LISBOA

KOPER

CORK

DUBLIN

ROTTERDAM

OSTEND

ZEEBRUGE

ANTWERP

BARCELONA

AMSTERDAM

HAMBURG SZCZECIN

SWINOUJSCIE

GDYNIA

DELFZIJL

MOERDIJK

VLISSINGEN

BREMEN

France

United

Kingdom

Ireland

Spain

Portugal

SETUBAL

1

2

The Abidjan disaster

On 19 August 2006, highly toxic

residues were dumped at over

a dozen sites in and around the

densely populated city of Abidjan

in Côte d’Ivoire. At least 10 peo-

ple were killed, many thousands

became violently ill and half a mil-

lion were forced to evacuate their

homes in the following weeks.

Meanwhile, the hazardous

residues have been recollected

and will be incinerated in France,

following emergency intervention

by the United Nations. Investiga-

tors in several countries pursued

several lines of investigation to

determine what led to the trag-

edy. Was this a classic case of

cross-border waste smuggling

to avoid the regulations and

high costs of waste disposal in

developed countries? Or was it

caused by the inadequate treat-

ment of the “slops” left over after

cleaning a ship’s holding tanks?

Understanding the causes of

such calamities is important for

assigning liability. But it is also

essential for gaining insights into

how the illegal waste trade can

operate. The ship that unloaded

the toxic residues visited several

other ports on its voyage to Abi-

djan, including The Hague, where

it aborted an effort to dispose of

wastes. Several months after the

original dumping, it was still un-

clear whether the Basel Conven-

tion on hazardous wastes had

been violated, or whether the the

MARPOL Convention applies,

which covers the treatment of

post-voyage cleaning residues.

Rotterdam

Singapore

Shanghaï

Ningbo

Hamburg

Guangzhou

Newcastle

Tianjin

Antwerp

China :

Qinhuangdao

Dalian

Qingdao

Dampier

Hongkong

Marseille

Le Havre

Bergen

Port Hedland

Long Beach

Houston New York

Tubarao

Saõ Paulo

Saõ Sebastiao

Kaohsiung

Yokahama

South Korea :

Pusan

Gwangyang

Ulsan

Nagoya

Richards

Bay

Vancouver

Atlantic

Ocean

Pacific

Ocean

Pacific

Ocean

Indian

Ocean

Major merchandise ports

[ and likely waste transit points ]

Sources:

Atlas du Monde Diplomatique 2006

, Armand Colin;

Panorama des ports de commerce mondiaux 2003

, ISEMAR, January 2005;

Images économiques du monde 2002

, Sedes.

The blue lines represent major trade routes

and are proportionnal to the traffic.

150 to 250

100 to 150

300 to 350

Total traffic in thousand tonnes

in 2003

50 to 70 70 to 100

|

37

36

|