GAZETTE
JULY/AUGUST 1985
The Competition Policy of the
European Community
Part I
by
Peter D. Sutherland
Member of the Commission of the European Communities
(The following is an edited version of an article first published in the St. Louis University Law Journal.)
Introduction
T
HE competition policy of the European Community
1
is part of the wider endeavour of European
integration on which repose the hopes of our citizens for
recovery and sustained prosperity
2
. Article 3(0 of the
EEC Treaty included "the institution of a system ensuring
that competition in the common market is not distorted"
among the activities of the Community to achieve the
purposes set out in Article 2 \ The Treaty is the Constitu-
tion of the EEC and its substantive provisions should be
regarded as constitutional in scope and importance.
I propose in this article to describe how competition
law and policy contribute to the Community's economic
recovery strategy based on the dual objectives of the
completion of a large, unfettered internal market and the
enhancement of the competitiveness of European
industry.
The role of competition policy in the Commission's
overall strategy for the Community may be seen in terms
of concentric circles. From the core, anti-trust rules
applied to companies
4
, one moves outwards to the other
competition rules applied to States in respect of public
monopolies
5
and aid schemes
6
, and then to other policies
laid down by the Treaty and developed by the
Community institutions. Of the policies which interact
closely with competition policy in their common pursuit
of the Community's objectives, I would mention specifi-
cally those dealing with industrial, internal market and
fiscal matters. It must be stressed that competition policy
is neither developed nor applied in a vacuum and that it
interacts constantly with the Community's economic and
even social policies.
The Commission will continue to combat agreements
and other restrictive practices which lead to a partitioning
of markets within the Community. Attempts to thwart
the objectives of the common market by cross-frontier
price or quota fixing will meet with a vigorous response,
as will measures impeding the free flow of goods and
services within the large market which our industries have
called for and needed for so long. Restrictions of output
or consumer choice within the common market will be
tolerated only in exceptional circumstances. However, it
is not sufficient in terms of competition policy to punish
violations and abuses. Part of our task is also to create
and foster conditions in which undistorted competition
may thrive. This may take the form of permitting, even
encouraging coordinated measures to reduce surplus
capacity in certain industries or of taking action against
Member States in order to break down national attempts
to distort competition by favouring domestic industries.
The Commission is not just a law enforcement agency:
it is an executive body which instigates legislation in the
Community to give legal expression to its policies. The
Commission has been active recently in adding to the
legislative framework of competition policy by enacting
some important Regulations concerning Patent
Licensing, Research and Development, Specialisation
and Motor Vehicle Distribution and Servicing
agreements
7
. In the State Aids sector too, legislation has
been enacted concerning the "transparency" of public
sector funding and aids to specific industries such as steel
and shipbuilding.
We are nowengaged in monitoring the implementation
of the recently enacted Regulations to which I have
referred. The enactment of these Regulations will enable
us to work rapidly through the backlog of notifications
under Article 85 of the Treaty: this is already being done.
In addition, the opposition procedure contained in the
Research and Development patent licensing and
specialisation Regulations, whereby in general the
Commission has six months in which it may raise an
objection, will lead to a much more rapid treatment of
notifications in areas covered by those Regulations. Some
other areas at which we are looking at present with a view
to considering how best to formulate our policy in legal
terms are joint ventures, know-how licensing, and
franchising. Our concern is to provide a clearly
understood framework for the dissemination of
technology in ways which respect the imperatives of the
common market, benefit the European consumer and
make a contribution to the competitiveness of European
industry. As regards competition policy towards state
aids, state monopolies and public undertakings, we shall
be concentrating on the battle against distortions of
competition and internal protectionism. Enforcement
policy will therefore focus on detailed examination of the
extent to which national aids distort competition within
the Community and, if so, whether the distortions to
which the aids give rise are outweighed by their benefits.
Among the legislative, explanatory and procedural
changes already introduced or contemplated in this sector
are the following:
- Guidelines on research and development support
schemes which will describe the conditions and
229