Previous Page  368 / 406 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 368 / 406 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

SEPTEMBER 1985

Correspondence

The Editor,

Incorporated Law Society Gazette,

Blackhall Place,

Dublin 7.

Dear Sir,

Free Legal Advice Centres would be grateful for the

opportunity to appeal once again, through you, to the

profession for financial support for its work. This is the

seventeenth year of FLAC's work, and since 1980 (when

the legal aid scheme was introduced) we have relied

almost entirely on voluntary donations from solicitors

and barristers.

FLAC now runs 22 part time centres around Dublin,

and a full time office in the city centre. These services

are for the many people whose problems are not dealt

with by the state scheme, such as social welfare and

employment appeals. In the past year we have handled

over 9,000 cases.

If we are to continue to meet this need we urgently

need funds. We are grateful for the generosity of the

profession in the past, and feel confident that members

will respond generously on this occasion also.

Yours faithfully,

Eamonn Conlon,

Chairperson, FLAC.

49 South William St., Dublin 2.

Editor,

The Gazette,

Blackhall Place,

Dublin 7.

12 December, 1985

Apprentices/Legal Offices Olympic Handball Club

The Dublin Senior League Division Two for men will

be run off over the months of January to March.

The following teams are already entered:-

Ringsend

The Office of Public Works.

Rush.

St. Marys College, Marion.

St. Patricks College, Drumcondra.

North Wall.

TCD.

UCD.

The Rockets.

Anyone interested in playing for the Blackhall Place

team should contact Catherine O'Connor at: 20 Upper

Merrion Street. Phone: 760981.

Yours faithfully,

Catherine O'Connor,

20 Upper Merrion Street,

Dublin 2.

Phone: 760981. 963048 (home).

The Editor,

8November, 1985

The Incorporated Law Society of Ireland Gazette,

Blackhall Place,

Dublin 7.

September 1985 - "Plain English"

Dear Sir,

I enjoyed reading the article on "Plain English" in

your September, 1985 issue. It reminded me of the

excellent example of Haigspeak to be found in the Law

Society's own standard form of Solicitor's Undertaking.

The wording for the "Client's Authority and Retainer"

frequently causes me embarrassment when I try to

explain to an unsuspecting client what it means — in

plain English. As a public relations exercise, it must rate

as a non-starter.

The present wording is as follows:-

"In consideration of your giving the foregoing Under-

taking, I hereby Undertake that I will not discharge

your retainer as my Solicitor in connection with the

foregoing transaction unless and until I have satisfact-

orily procured your release from the obligations

imposed by such Undertaking and to indemnify you and

all your partners and your and their Executors, Admin-

istrators and Assigns against any loss arising from my

act or default".

The above consists of one sentence of 68 words. As a

suggested alternative which I'm quite sure can be

improved upon - I would like to put forward the fol-

lowing:-

"If you give the attached undertaking, I for my part

undertake not to discharge you as my Solicitor until you

have been released from the undertaking. I also agree to

indemnify you, your partners and successors against

any loss arising from my act or default".

I would be interested to hear of any other examples of

gobbledy gook from other practitioners.

Yours faithfully,

Ann Fitzgerald & Co., Solicitors,

70 Shandon Street,

North Gate Bridge,

Cork.

Comment. . .

(continued from page 327)

Paper 'habitual residence', being the Continental Version

of Domicile, is gaining ground even in the United King-

dom and in the view of the Commission it provides

" a more appropriate and simpler solution in most

cases but also is in harmony with the trends in Euro-

pean Private International Law. In regard to the

specific problem of the domicile of married women

the adoption of habitual residence as a connecting

factor would remove any discrimination . . . "

We would urge the Government to reconsider its pro-

posed bill and that rather than 'tinkering' with an

outmoded legal doctrine, abolishes it completely, even if

it means adopting the principal of 'habitual residence'

contained in the Fianna Fail Bill. In our view if they do

that the law will be the better for it, and that surely is

what parliament and legislation should be all about.

356