GAZETTE
MARCH 1985
organs of public opinion and these must be held to
include television as well as radio. It places upon the
State the obligation to ensure that these organs of
public opinion shall not be used to undermine
public order or public morality or the authority of
the State".
There is also the right to communicate. Costello J. in
Attorney General
-v-
Paper link Ltd. \
stated that the "very
general and basic right to communicate . . . must be one of
those personal unspecified rights of the citizen protected
by Article 40.3.1°". This right to communicate, continued
Costello J., was not, however, an absolute right: the right
may be regulated by laws.
Broadcasting Legislation
Two features have characterised legislation to date
relating to broadcasting and wireless telegraphy in
Ireland, as elsewhere. Firstly, the electromagnetic
spectrum, the natural resource essential to broadcasting,
has been regarded as a limited resource owned by
Governments. The allocation of frequencies is the subject
of international negotiation between Governments. The
unrestricted right to use the electromagnetic spectrum as
some kind of property or personal right of individuals has
not to date been generally propounded. This may be so
because of the attitudes to such rights during the
formative years of broadcasting development
8
. However,
with the new technologies, the concept of limited access to
broadcasting is now being challenged. It is argued that
"both in the national and international field, we are
passing from a period of scarcity, and therefore of access
limited, controlled and distributed by States, to a period
of increasing abundance, and therefore of pluralism and
autonomy"
9
. Secondly, broadcasting has been regarded
as a powerful media form which is brought directly into
people's homes, and therefore, according to Govern-
ments, must be subject to regulation.
Thus, the Minister for Communications has, subject to
certain exceptions, exclusive privileges in relation to
telecommunications which includes broadcasting
10
. No
person may keep or have in his possession anywhere in the
State, apparatus for wireless telegraphy — which includes
broadcasting apparatus — without a licence from the
Minister for Communications". Certain types of
communication • are forbidden. Indecent messages or
communications and communications subversive of
public order may not be sent by wireless telegraphy
12
. The
Minister for Communications may, by order, direct the
Radio Telefis Eireann Authority to refrain from
broadcasting certain matter where the Minister is of the
opinion that the broadcasting of such matter would be
likely to promote or incite to crime or would tend to
undermine the authority of the State
13
. The Government
may take control of wireless telegraphy (radio communi-
cation, cable, etc.) and broadcasting during an
emergency
14
.
The Broadcasting Authority Act 1960, the principal
Act regulating the broadcasting service, empowered RTE
to establish and maintain a national television and sound
broadcasting service
15
. The 1960 Act provided that the
Minister for Posts and Telegraphs would not thereafter
exercise any of the powers conferred upon him by Part II
of the Wireless Telegraphy Act 1926 which empowered
him to acquire, establish and maintain broadcasting
stations. Thus, RTE has since 1960 enjoyed a
de facto
legal monopoly in broadcasting.
However, there are unlicensed radio stations (pirate
radios) operating throughout the country. There have
been several successful prosecutions of persons involved
in unlicensed broadcasting. Following a "search and
seizure" operation under The Wireless Telegraphy Acts
1926-1972 against two unlicensed broadcasting stations
(pirate radios) the constitutionality of the Wireless
Telegraphy Acts 1926-1972 was challenged. Counsel for
the plaintiffs in interlocutory applications in
Nova Media
Services Ltd.
-v-
The Minister for Posts and Telegraphs and
The Attorney General
and in
Sunshine Radio Productions
Ltd. -v- The Attorney General, Ireland and The Minister for
Posts and Telegraphs
16
claimed that any State monopoly
in respect of radio broadcasting was contrary to the
Constitution. Counsel argued,
inter alia,
that Article 45 of
the Constitution which sets out the directive principles of
social policy recognises an ideological preference for
private enterprise over State monopoly. Murphy J. in the
High Court considered that the Plaintiffs had made out a
stateable case on these constitutional claims. However, he
considered that the constitutional issues raised difficult
questions of law which called for detailed consideration
and could not be dealt with in interlocutory proceedings.
The Government is to introduce legislation to provide for
local radio under the control of an independent authority.
Legislation is also promised to provide tougher penalties
for those involved in unlicensed broadcasting.
The 1960 Act, as amended
17
, specified the general duty
of the RTE Authority. The Authority, in performing its
functions must in its programming,
inter alia,
"uphold the
democratic values enshrined in the Constitution,
especially those relating to rightful liberty of expression".
The Authority must not in its programmes and in the
methods employed to produce its programmes
"unreasonably encroach on the privacy of the
individual"
18
. All news broadcasts and current affairs
broadcasts must be presented in an objective and
impartial manner
19
. Specifically, current affairs
broadcasts must be fair to all interests concerned
20
. Apart
from the specific restrictions on broadcasting which we
have already mentioned, restrictions in the context of
public order, public morality, the authority of the State
and the necessity to hold a licence, there are further
restrictions under the general law. Such restrictions
include defamation
21
, contempt of court, the Official
Secrets Act 1963, copyright
22
and reporting of court
proceedings on the preliminary examination of an
accused person
23
.
Broadcasting and European Community Law
Relying on the principles enumerated in the following
Articles of the Treaty establishing the European
Economic Community — Article 2 (the promotion
throughout the community of a harmonious development
of economic activities); Article 3(0 (ensuring that compe-
tition is not distorted in the common market); Article
5 (Member States to refrain from any measures which
could jeopardise the attainment of the objects outlined in
the Treaty); Articles 9 to 37 (the principle of free
movement of goods); and Articles 59 to 66 (the principle
of free movement of services) — it is submitted that the
countries of the European Economic Community
constitute a "communications community". The free
movement of information and freedom of communica-
tion could be described as two of the "basic pillars" of the
European Economic Community.
46