Previous Page  151 / 264 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 151 / 264 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

SEPTEMBER 1978,

Correspondence

ADJUDICATION FOR STAMP DUTY

Office of the Revenue

Commissioners

Dublin Castle,

Dublin 2.

13 September, 1978.

J. J. Ivers, Esq.,

Director General,

The Law Society,

Blackhall Place,

Dublin 7.

Dear Mr. Ivers,

I refer to your recent representations concerning delays

in dealing with cases lodged for adjudication for the

purposes of Stamp Duties.

Following your earlier representations certain staff

adjustments were made in this area. You will be glad to

hear that the arrears has been reduced from a peak of

approximately 4,300 cases in March last to a current

level of 1,500. The delay in dealing with cases has been

reduced from approximately 5 months to 10 weeks. I

agree that the position is not yet satisfactory but

considerable progress has already been made and, in the

absence of uniforseen circumstances, the arrears should be

disposed of by the end of this year. You will appreciate

that the training of new staff in a technical area is,

necessarily, a slow process.

Yours sincerely,

M. K. O'Connor,

Commissioner.

SOLICITORS RESPONSIBILITY FOR COUNSELS

DELAY

12, South Mall,

Cork.

22nd September, 1978

Dear Sir,

An English decision of the 14th July, 1978 might be of

interest to Practitioners. In

Mainzs

v.

James & Charles

Dodd

it was held that solicitors who took six months to

obtain Counsel's Opinion in relation to a pending action

which was dismissed for want of prosecution were guilty

of inexcusable and inordinate delay and accountable for

the part of the delay caused by Counsel.

The exact duty of a solicitor to his client depended

upon what he was employed to do but he was always

expected to exercise a reasonable degree of care, skill and

knowledge in whatever he did. In particular, in a stale

action he must act expeditiously to protect his client's

action against being struck out by reason of delay caused

by the solicitors neglect.

The Defendants were accountable not only for their

part but also for that of Counsel. When Counsel was

dilatory in dealing with instructions in stale actions

solicitors should in the interest of their clients withdraw

those instructions and pass them to another Counsel for a

more ready response.

The total of inexcusable and inordinate delay after

giving full credit to what the Defendants did faultlessly

and in time was about six months. This was a long time in

the circumstances and the Plaintiff's case was fully

approved.

Yours sincerely,

Rory F. Conway.

THE LAW SOCIETY

Vacancy for

Assistant Examiner

in Conveyancing

Applications are invited not later than 17th November,

1978 for the post of:

Assistant Examiner In Conveyancing

Particulars may be obtained from:

DIRECTOR GENERAL,

The Law Society,

Blackhall Place, Dublin 7.

151