GAZETTE
SEPTEMBER 1978,
CONVEYANCING NOTES
ARCHITECTS' CERTIFICATES OF COMPLIANCE
Difficulties have arisen in recent years between
Architects acting for Developers particularly of housing
estates in Dublin and Cork in relation to the type of
Certificate requested by Solicitors, particularly Solicitors
for lending institutions as to compliance with the
conditions (other than for payment of financial
contributions) contained in the Planning Permission.
It is clear that the tendency was to seek ever more
detailed Certificates from the Architects and this
development placed the Architects in considerable
difficulty. The main difficulty is that the Royal Institute of
Architects of Ireland has a rule that Architects ought not
to give Certificates as to compliance with conditions with
Planning Permissions and Bye Laws approval where they
have not been employed to supervise the construction of
the houses. In most housing estates, there is no question
of Architects being employed by builders to supervise the
day to day construction. The best that could be hoped for
is that the Architect would carry out an inspection of the
property after completion and give such modified form of
Certificate as was propr proper following such inspection.
Discussions took place between representatives of the
Society and of the Institute of Architects. The Society
then sought advice from E. M. Walsh, S.C., in general
and in particular, to settle a form of Certificate that a
reasonable Solicitor for a Purchaser and lending
institution should accept. This was duly done and the text
of the Certificate which has been agreed with the Royal
Institute of Architects of Ireland is set out hereunder. This
Certificate is also acceptable to the Solicitors for all of the
main lending institutions. The Conveyancing Committee
of the Law Society is satisfied that this Certificate is a
reasonable one for a Solicitor for a purchaser or a lending
institution to accept.
The Royal Institute of the Architects of Ireland
Certificate of Compliance
I am the Architect retained by:
AND I CERTIFY THAT
1. I visited the office of the Planning Authority and there
inspected the house plans, estate layout plan,
specification and other drawings and documents
which were represented by the Planning Authority as
those on foot of which the permission/approval
mentioned at paragraph 2 & 3 hereunder were
granted.
2. The notification of Grant of Permission/Approval
Decision Order No. and Date:
Register Reference No.:
Planning Control No.:
Dated:
relates to the erection of houses on inter-alia sites;
(both inclusive) as detailed on the said estate layout
plan.
3. The Building Bye-Laws Approval Notice:
Register No.:
Order No.:
Planning Control No.:
relates to inter-alia sites (both inclusive) as detailed on
the said estate layout plan.
I FURTHER CERTIFY that I Have inspected the house
that has been built on site
and that, in my opinion,
this house has been erected in substantial compliance with
the Notification of Grant of Permission mentioned at
paragraph 2 above and the Building Bye-Laws Approval
Notice mentioned at paragraph 3 above, and that the
position of the house and site is in substantial compliance
with the estate layout plan mentioned at paragraph 1
above in so far as the estate has been completed.
I am of the opinion also that, if the house and site have
not been built and/or laid out exactly in accordance with
the Planning Permission and Bye-Law approval, the
differences are unlikely to affect the planning and
development of the area as envisaged by the Planning
Authority, and expressed through the above-mentioned
approvals.
It should be noted that I did not supervise the erection
of this house in the course of its construction. Thus the
inspection was a superficial one only, and could take no
account of work covered up. The comparison of the site
layout with the estate layout plan was visual only.
& *
*
Family Home Protection Act, 1976:
The Conveyancing Committee is unanimouslv of the
opinion that no fee should be charged by vendors for the
furnishing of a declaration that the premises in question
are not a Family Home under the provisions of the
Family Home Protection Act, 1976.
^ *
FEE FARM GRANTS
A Fee Farm Grant of land made after the 16th of May,
1978 may be void by reason of Section 2 (1) of the
Landlord and Tenant Ground Rents Act 1977. This
subsection affects Leases made after the 16th of May,
1978 (being the date of the operation of the Act), if the
Lessee would have had the right to acquire the Fee Simple
under Section 3 of the 1967 Landlord and Tenant
Ground Rents Act. Section 3 of the 1967 Act gives the
Lessees under Building or Proprietory Leases the right to
acquire the fee simple. Building or Proprietory Leases are
defined by the Landlord and Tenant Reversionary Leases,
Act, 1958 which by Section 2 defines a Lease as
including inter alia a Fee Farm Grant. A Fee Farm Grant
is accordingly capable of being a Building or Proprietory
Lease and if such may come within the provisions of
Section 2 (1) of the 1977 Act.
&
* *
SUPPLY OF MAPS
Solicitors ought to note that it rests on vendors to
supply maps in a transfer of land.
189




