Previous Page  66 / 112 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 66 / 112 Next Page
Page Background

62

The Gazette of the Incorporated Law Society of Ireland.

[DECEMBER, 1909

sued defendant

to

recover damages

in

consequence of being bitten by the defen

dant's dogs. The case was tried by a jury.

During his cross-examination the plaintiff

stated that he could not afford to pay the

costs of the action, and that he had verbally

arranged with his Solicitor not to pay any

costs. The jury found a verdict for £15 in

favour of plaintiff. Counsel for the defendant

contended that by reasons of the provisions

of Sections 4 and 5 of the Solicitors Act,

1870, the plaintiff was not entitled to any

costs of the action.

Section 4 of the Solicitors Act, 1870, is as

follows :—" An attorney or solicitor may

make an agreement in writing with his client

respecting the amount and manner of pay

ment for the whole or any part of any past

or future services, fees, charges, or disburse

ments in respect of business done or to be

done by such attorney or solicitor

.

.

either by a gross sum, or by commission, or

percentage, or by salary or otherwise, and

either at the same or at a greater or at a less

rate as or than the rate at which he would

otherwise be entitled to be remunerated .

. ."

Section 5 :—" Such an agreement shall not

affect the amount of, or any rights or remedies

for the recovery of, any costs recoverable

from the client by any other person, or pay

able to the client by any other person, and

any such other person may require any costs

payable or recoverable by him to or from the

client to be taxed according to the rules for

the time being in force for the taxation of

such costs, unless such person has otherwise

agreed :

Provided always that the client who

has "entered into such agreement shall not

be entitled to recover from any other person

under any order for the payment of any

costs which are the subject of such agreement

more than the amount payable by the client

to his own attorney or solicitor under the

same."

The County Court Judge was of opinion

that the agreement between the Solicitor and

the plaintiff did not require to be in writing

for the proviso to Section 5 to apply, and he

;

held

therefore that the plaintiff was not

entitled

to

recover any costs

from

the

i

defendant.

i

The plaintiff appealed.

The Court dismissed the appeal, holding

that as under the agreement the plaintiff

was not liable to pay any costs

to his

Solicitor, he was not entitled to recover any

from the defendant.

Leave to appeal was given, upon the sum

of £25 being brought into Court within ten

days.

Reported

The Law Journal,

vol. xliv, 665 ;

Times Law Reports,

vol. xxvi., p. 43.

CHANCERY DIVISION (ENGLAND).

(Before Joyce, J.)

In re Massey and others, Solicitors.

Nov. 2, 1909.—

Solicitor—Bill of Costs—Taxa

tion within twelve months after payment—

Special circumstances—Solicitors

(Eng

land) Act,

1843 (6

and 1 Vie., c.

73),

s.

41—

Attornies and Solicitors

(Ireland)

Act,

1849 (12

and

13

Vie., c.

53), s. 6.

ON October 12, 1907, bills of costs were

delivered by Solicitors to their clients. The

bills contained certain items of disbursements

which had not in fact been paid at that time,

but which were paid on October 28, 1907,

and June 1, 1908, respectively. The bills

were paid by the clients on May 21 and June

23, 1908. On December 16, 1908, after the

decision in

Sadd

v.

Griffin

(24

The Times,

L.R., 715 ;

[1908J 2 K.B., 510), an applica

tion was made by the clients for the taxation

of those bills of costs.

Held,

that no " special circumstances"

had been shown for referring the bills of costs

for taxation, and that the application must,

therefore, be dismissed.

The application was for the taxation of

certain bills of costs which had been delivered

by the Solicitors to their clients, the Sirdar

Rubber Company, Limited, and paid by the

Company. The business in respect of which

the costs were incurred consisted mainly of

litigation relating to certain patents, which

went through all the Courts up to the House

of Lords. The costs were heavy, the total

amount of the bills being £2,743 9s.

There

were 13 bills in all.

Six of them had been

paid more than twelve months before this

application, one had not yet been paid, the

remaining 6 had been paid within twelve

months ;

and it was as to these that the

question of

the right to taxation arose.

Section 41 of the Solicitors (England) Act,