Previous Page  50 / 92 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 50 / 92 Next Page
Page Background

50

Options for waste management

There are many different ways of dealing with human waste

(urine and faeces) from mountaineers, although leaving the

waste behind (buried in soil or snow, or deposited in crevasses) is

still by far the most common means of disposal in remote alpine

environments (Derlet et al., 2008; Pickering and Barros, 2015).

Initiatives such as the Clean Mountain Can (CMC), introduced by

the American Alpine Club in 2001 in Denali led to the current

policy requiring all climbers to carry and use CMCs (Rassler,

2014). The CMC is a portable toilet which is specifically designed

for use on three-week expeditions. The CMCs have had some

success in minimizing contamination of surface snow, although

there are reports that climbers empty out the CMCs in other

crevassed areas (Apollo, 2014). Another similar programme is the

‘Pack it out - Poo pots’ introduced in New Zealand (Department

of Conservation, n.d.). Other forms of human waste removal are

more expensive and resource intensive, such as fly-out systems

using helicopters, as is the case on Mount Aconcagua. Fly-out

systems are also commonly used in the European Alps to remove

waste from refuges. There has, however, been limited success in

policing and monitoring these practices. An estimated 200 kg of

human faeces were left in campsites around Mount Aconcagua

during the 2010/2011 summer season, representing a 10 per

cent non-compliance with Park policy (Barros, Pickering and

Gudes, 2015) – which requires packing up waste in bags for

deposit at Park exit points.

Other solid waste, such as plastic residue and other materials

are often burned in open pits or carried off the mountain and

dumped in nearby landfills. However, many of the existing

municipal and regional waste management facilities are basic

and poorly resourced (if they exist at all), and are not designed to

deal with additional solid waste; they can be filled to capacity or

even overflow (e.g. Wani & Ahmad, 2013; Anand & Singh, 2014).

Other issues include a lack of adequate lining (such as geo-

membranes) covering the floor of these landfills; these help to

contain leachate from toxic refuse such as batteries and plastics,

which can pollute groundwater and subsoils.

Mountaineer carrying a green

Clean Mountain Can on top of

his rucksack.

Photo

©

Coley Gentzel