Previous Page  69 / 92 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 69 / 92 Next Page
Page Background

69

The Gold King mine, located in the San Juan Mountains of

Colorado, last operated in 1922 but has been in the news in recent

years due to an unwanted legacy that had been slowly building up

in the abandoned gold and silver mine. The legacy was acid mine

drainage. In 2015 officers from the United States Environmental

Protection Agency (EPA) investigating a slow leak at the mine

entrance, accidently released 3million gallons of this toxic material

(Chief et al 2016). Much of the contaminated water and sludge

flowed into the Animas River, the upper reaches of which were

already adversely affected by decades of slow seepage of acidic

water from the mine. The Animas River flows into the San Juan

River and ultimately into the Colorado River (traversing 5 states -

Colorado, Utah, NewMexico, Arizona, Nevada, and California).

The sudden release of large volumes of toxic material, that

included lead and arsenic, had a widespread impact that

extended far downstream, disrupting the drinking water supply

of towns and halting recreational activities and irrigation of

crops leading to heavy crop failure. The impact of the acid

mine drainage on water quality and river bed sediments

appears to have been fairly short lived (the Animas River had

poor water quality pre-spill) as snow melt helped to dilute the

river water and wash away contaminated sediment (Cohen

2015). However, the spill had serious financial consequences

for many people, due to tourism and agricultural losses. As a

consequence, many states and individuals are suing the EPA for

damages (Roberts 2016).

CASE STUDY

Acid mine drainage in mountain areas – a slow motion

environmental problem

Retention ponds set up by the US EPA following the accidental release of acid mine water from the Gold King mine in Colorado in

2015. The water in the ponds is treated with lime which raises the pH and sodium hydroxide solution which facilitates sedimentation

of the metals prior to release of the water. The process is time consuming and expensive. As of August 2016, the US EPA had dedicated

$29 million to the clean-up and remediation effort (US EPA 2016).

Photo

©

Wikimedia/EPA