Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  318 / 350 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 318 / 350 Next Page
Page Background

MILAN LIPOVSKÝ

CYIL 4 ȍ2013Ȏ

public international law, because the participating teams represent 550 law schools

based in more than 80 countries, including the Czech Republic. Obviously not all

these schools are able to send their teams to the international rounds that take place

in Washington D.C., USA, at the beginning of every year. The national rounds are

designed to select the best team (or, in larger countries, teams) that get through to

the international rounds and compete for that particular year’s best team award. The

so called compromis is on a written basis – a fictitious scenario, usually based on

some current issues that the international community deals with or has dealt with

and lays down four questions as a prayer for relief. Each team needs to write a written

submission for both applicant and respondent and send it to ILSA. The moot court

simulates proceedings in front of the International Court of Justice, so, except for

the rules of the competition, the participants need to familiarize themselves with all

possible sources of international law that they can search for and find relevant. The

written phase is followed by preparation of the oral rounds. Both of these phases

are evaluated independently. In the Czech Republic the national rounds alternate

between Prague, Brno and Olomouc, and the 2013 national rounds took place within

the beautiful premises of Anglo-American University in Prague. The oral rounds

truly simulate the International Court of Justice proceedings; hence the participants

need to present their case as well as respond to the questions of judges and to

arguments presented by their opponents. And manage to do this within a set time

limit. Due to this, the competition is more exciting and helps the students enhance

their presentation skills as well as find what weaknesses they need to improve. The

teams may consist of a maximum of 5 members, so there are mostly four speakers

and one researcher; however, this plan of action is not mandatory. The teams are

then evaluated according to the quality of their performance, and the best team (only

one in the Czech Republic) proceeds to the international rounds. The international

rounds themselves are an amazing experience: meeting participants from all over the

world, competing in front of judges/lawyers from different jurisdictions, enhancing

English language skills, and, of course, also being in the US capital city during the

beginning of year, when the trees are blossoming and the sky is deep blue. Since

the competitions simulate the ICJ proceedings, it is not an exception that the finals

judicial panel is presided over by a real ICJ judge. Taking all this information into

account, one cannot doubt that participating in Jessup is an unforgettable experience.

The PF UK’s teams have won the national rounds in many years (e.g. 2007 and

2008) and then competed in the international rounds. As the 2014 rounds are in

preparation, it is worth noting the theme for next year. The competition is going to

concern itself with the conflict between maritime development and conservation,

criminal jurisdiction, and maritime salvage rights.

Jessup is not the only competition that students of the Department of International

Law have participated in. Our team has also succeeded in the

World Human Rights

Moot Court Competition

. This competition was divided into two parts as well, the first

one was written and the second oral. The oral rounds took place 6 – 14 December in