Previous Page  56 / 338 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 56 / 338 Next Page
Page Background

able on

instruments conveying or

transferring

property from a subsidiary to a parent company.

ATTORNEYS' COSTS IN THE U.S.A.

NEW YORK STATE

THE Society on behalf of a member had occasion

recently to make enquiries as to the procedure for

taxation of Attorney's costs in uncontested probate

matters in the State of New York. The following

information obtained as a result of the enquiries is

published as being of interest to members. Section

231-3 of the Surrogate's Court Act provides as

follows :

At any time during the administration of an estate,

and irrespective of the pendency of a particular

proceeding, the Surrogate shall have power to hear

an application for and to fix and determine the

compensation of an attorney for sendees rendered to

an estate or to its representative, or to a devisee,

legatee, distributee or any person interested therein;

or of an attorney who has rendered legal services in

connection with his official duties as an executor,

administrator, testamentary, trustee, or guardian;

or in proceedings to compel the delivery of papers

or funds in the hands of such attorney.

Such proceedings shall be instituted by petition of

a representative of the estate, or a person interested,

or an attorney who his rendered services.

Notice of the application shall be given in such

manner as the Surrogate may direct. The Surrogate

may direct payment therefor from the estate generally

or from the funds in the hands of the representative

belonging to any legatee, devisee, distributee or

person interested therein.

In the event that any such attorney has already

received or been paid a sum in excess of the fair value

of his services as thus determined, the Surrogate

shall have power to direct him to refund such excess.

There is no fee schedule in the Courts in New

York.

In some cases the local bar association es

tablishes what is called a " Minimum Fee Schedule"

which has no binding force, but which will furnish

some guidance. For instance, such a schedule has

been adopted by the Bar Association in Queen's

County, one of the Counties in the City of New York,

and also by Nassau County, which is not in the city

but an adjoining County. However, these schedules

do not cover a contested probate. They do suggest

a minimum fee for an uncontested probate which is

more or less routine, in which the percentage is

roughly 4-5% of the gross estate where the estate is

in the §20,000 range. For a contested matter, the

usual considerations of time

spent, difficulties

involved,

the nature of

the services, amount

involved, professional standing, and results obtained

are applicable.

PROCEEDINGS AGAINST

UNQUALIFIED PERSON ACTING

FOR HEIR CHASER

ACTING on evidence supplied by a member on

behalf of a client who is a beneficiary in an American

estate, the Society instituted proceedings in the

Dublin Atetropolitan Court against the defendant,

who is a civil servant, for a contravention of Section,^

58 (i) (b), of the Solicitors Act 1954. Under thej|

section it is an offence for an unqualified person, fot|

or in expectation of fee or reward, to procure or tol

attempt to procure the execution by an Irish citizen,!

of a document relating to real or personal estate

situated outside the State and the United Kingdom

or any legal proceeding actual or in contemplation

in relation to such property. Under the document

executed by

the beneficiary at

the defendant's

request, she undertook to pay one third of the sum-'

received by her to the American heir chaser for his;

sendees. Subsequent to the institution of proceed-!

ings the defendant admitted the offence and gave an

undertaking not to repeat it and the Society allowed

the proceedings to be struck out on receiving a full J"

indemnity against the costs.

SOLICITORS' BENEVOLENT

ASSOCIATION

RESOLUTION of Metropolitan Directors of Solicitors';^

Benevolent Association held on ist October, 1958,"^

at the Solicitors' Buildings, Four Courts.

The

following Resolution was proposed by

Mr. Dineen B. Gilmore and seconded by Mr. Patrick

R. Boyd and duly passed unanimously :

RESOLVED :

that the Directors of the Solicitors'

Benevolent Association having received with great

regret the resignation of their Chairman Mr. Richard

A. O'Brien hereby record their appreciation of his

conduct of the business of the Association as

Chairman and of his untiring efforts during the

period of 21 years in office to advance the charitable

objects for which the Association was founded.

THE SUPREME COURT

WILLIAM L. DUGGAN, APPELLANT.

THE INCORPORATED LAW SOCIETY OF IRELAND,

RESPONDENTS.

On November i4th the Supreme Court delivered J

judgment allowing the appeal of Mr. William L.

Duggan against an order of the Chief Justice by|

which the Chief Justice refused to discharge a|

direction from the Society to the Registrar of8