Previous Page  18 / 64 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 18 / 64 Next Page
Page Background

132

JCPSLP

Volume 19, Number 3 2017

Journal of Clinical Practice in Speech-Language Pathology

with mental illness, as well as providing students with the

knowledge, skills and awareness to advocate for ongoing

services for patients throughout their professional allied

health careers.

This main aim of this research study was to explore the

understanding, beliefs and attitudes of exercise physiology

(EP), speech-language pathology (SLP) and dietetic (DTn)

students towards mental health and mental illness prior to

commencing a 6–8 week clinical placement within a mental

health setting, and examine the nature and degree of any

changes seen post placement.

Method

The hypothesis of this study arose from the idea that

through providing clinical experience with patients who

have a mental health concern, allied health students,

including speech-language pathology students, will gain a

greater understanding about their professional role with this

clinical group and experience positive change in previously

held beliefs and attitudes. A convenience sample (Teddie &

Yu, 2007) of students from the disciplines of exercise

physiology, speech-language pathology and dietetics was

recruited. These professions were selected as they

represent the allied health professions that are playing an

increasingly important role in the care of people with mental

health concerns. Students were invited to participate in the

study by the primary author, who was associated with the

research though not responsible for the clinical education of

two of the included disciplines (exercise physiology and

dietetics). The invitation occurred in the first week of the

students’ placement. Students interested in participating in

the study responded directly to their clinical supervisor in

their respective discipline.

The research was overseen by two academics from two

universities in Australia. This study received ethics clearance

from the University of Melbourne Department of Medical

Education Health Advisory Group Ethics Committee

(#1543866) and the NSW Health Northern Sydney Local

Health District Human Research Ethics Committee

(#LNR/15/HAWKE/102 & #LNRSSA/15/HAWKE/122).

Participants

A total of 26 students were recruited for this study. Ten

students from exercise physiology, 10 students from

speech-language pathology and 6 students from dietetics

participated. All students were from the same university

undertaking clinical placement within a multidisciplinary

team located within a psychiatric inpatient metropolitan

mental health facility for a period of between six to eight

weeks. The university was responsible for allocation of

students to this site as per standard university procedure.

As part of the recruitment process students were provided

with a plain English description of what participation in the

study would entail. It was made clear that participation was

voluntary and the decision to participate would not impact

their clinical placement assessment or influence current or

future relationships with their university or the placement

organisation.

Data collection

Students’ beliefs and attitudes towards mental health were

explored pre-placement and again post-placement using

the following three validated questionnaires.

Level of Familiarity Survey (LOF) (Corrigan, Edwards

et al., 2001; Michaels & Corrigan, 2013) – examining

experience and familiarity with mental illness

latter action an example of discrimination. Discrimination

refers the behavioural reaction to the stereotypes and

prejudices held about a particular group and may manifest

in the health care sector as exclusion from, withholding of

or redirecting of services. Stereotypes (beliefs), prejudices

(attitudes) and discrimination (behaviours) are important to

examine and understand within health care settings, as

negative views can interfere with efficient patient care and

hinder a truly person-centred approach to service provision.

The role of education and

experience in changing attitudes

Emerging literature highlights some evidence about the

positive effect of dedicated clinical experience and/or

education about mental health in shifting students’ attitudes

and understanding about mental health. For example,

exposure to people with mental health conditions, through

clinical placements, has been shown to afford several

benefits for students and health professions more generally

in the areas of skills and knowledge (Feeney, Jordan, &

McCarron, 2013), as well as beliefs and attitudes

(Markstrom et al., 2009). Students may demonstrate a

reduction in their fears and anxieties about working in

mental health through exposure to and involvement in this

setting (Thomas & Bhattacharya, 2012) and increase

intentions to pursue careers in this area of clinical practice

as a result of greater familiarity and understanding (Happell

& Gaskin, 2012). As the need for services to support

patients with mental health concerns increases, so too

does the relevance and recognised role for allied health

clinicians (NSW Health, 2015). Therefore it is essential that

allied health students, including speech-language pathology

students, receive adequate preparation for work in a

diverse range of clinical areas, prior to graduation.

Information about how training programs and clinical

placements influence medical students’ attitudes towards

mental illness is most prevalent within the research

literature; however, outcomes of studies are mixed

(Happell & Gaskin, 2012; Stubbs, 2014). Some low-level

studies (utilising pre-post evaluation methods) suggest

training results in little or no change in attitudes, although

knowledge and understanding of mental health may

increase (Happell & Gaskin, 2012; Stubbs 2014). Yet

other studies have found positive changes in the attitudes

of health care students in connection with a clinical

placement in mental health (Corrigan, Druss, & Perlick,

2011; Corrigan, Edwards, Green, Diwan, & Penn, 2001;

Corrigan, Green, Lundin, Kubiak, & Penn, 2001; Corrigan,

Markowitz, Watson, Rowan, & Kubiak, 2003). To date,

there has been a paucity of literature exploring the benefits

of clinical placements and education programs within the

area of mental health for allied health students, relative

to medical or nursing literature. As the role and profile of

allied health professionals within this area increases and is

further acknowledged, a focus on high-quality methods to

adequately prepare graduates is warranted.

Exposure, discussion and explicit instruction regarding

mental illness is assumed to play an important role in

determining and reforming attitudes, both of professionals

and students. Clinical placements within mental health

are a unique and rich opportunity to influence students’

skills, knowledge and understanding of a potential area of

specialisation (Callaghan, Cooper, & Gray, 2007). Exposure

to mental health contexts as students may also assist

with identifying, challenging and addressing any negative

or inaccurate beliefs and attitudes held towards patients