Previous Page  50 / 58 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 50 / 58 Next Page
Page Background

Sweeping new markets for

business growth

Going abroad in the pursuit of new

markets is of interest to many Chinese

corporations, including Chinese

manufacturers, which have a number

of particular motivations. Many

manufacturing corporations in China are

seeing their sectors deregulating, are

mired by overcapacity production, and

are encountering strong pressure on profit

in their home market. Consequently, this

specific group of Chinese corporations

are unsurprisingly seeking new markets

abroad where they can enjoy less fierce

competition and earn higher profits.

Obtaining the latest

technologies and advanced

management skills

Innovation as a means to stay ahead

in the business world is paramount

for any company, and Chinese

corporations are no different in realizing

the importance of this concept. For

some time, Chinese corporations

(manufacturers in particular) have

competed with other corporations on

the global stage on low labor costs and

forceful pricing, instead of on inventive,

branded products with profit margins

that are higher. A growing number of

Chinese corporations are now certainly

developing their own technologies and

management know how to enhance

their global competitiveness. Other

Chinese corporations, however, have

gone abroad and have sought global

partnerships and/or foreign acquisitions

to fill any existing technological and/

or management skills gap that they

perceive exists between them and other

global corporations operating in the

same business environment.

M&A activity – A means to an end

The number of mergers and acquisitions

(M&A) of overseas business entities by

Chinese corporates has not seen any let

up of late. Buoyed by the B&R initiative,

2016 saw a rapid increase in the number

of overseas M&A deals executed by

corporations from China.

to achieve a socialist market economy and

improve the modern enterprise system.” In

essence, what this entails, is that China’s

SOEs, particularly the big SOEs should:

>

>

Participate and contest in global markets.

>

>

Assign resources around the world.

>

>

Improve operational efficiency.

The B&R initiative plays a big part in this

overall scheme and will serve as a major

stepping stone as China-based SOEs

‘feel the stones as they cross the global

economic river.’

The B&R initiative will undoubtedly create

more promising external circumstances for

China’s SOEs to invest abroad and therefore

herald a new age of China’s SOE sector

internationalization. By taking advantage

of the B&R initiative, it is expected that the

internationalization of China’s SOEs will

alter emphasis from simply expansion to

enhancing operations management and

improving global competitiveness.

POEs in particular

With the rising economic might of Chinese

POEs and the government’s encouragement

for “going out,” a diminishing share of

China’s cumulative outward foreign direct

investment (FDI) is stemming from China’s

SOEs. To illustrate this, by the end of 2015,

China’s outward investment flow from

its SOEs stood at a 34.7% share of total

outflow However, outward investment flow

from the country’s non-SOEs (essentially

POEs) accounted for a massive 65.3% of

China’s total accumulated outflow.

With their business flexibility, fast-paced

growth, investment diversification,

and being somewhat less affected by

clampdowns on investment in the host

countries, China’s POEs have the potential

to ride the B&R initiative and gain even

better investment results and benefits.

Having said this, however, China’s POEs do

and will continue to face obstacles in being

able to “go out.” One of these is financing

as POEs often have to work that much

harder to gain the financial backing for their

overseas ventures from banks.

The report found that China’s top

location of interest was the U.S., with 84

transactions completed in 2016. What’s

more, the amount of actual investment

involved during the same time period,

jumped by a larger 148% to U.S. $215.8

billion. According to the same report,

these deals were concentrated in a

number of specific sectors, including,

manufacturing, financial services, and

health. Highlight deals included:

>

>

China National Chemical Corporation’s

(ChemChina) U.S. $43 billion acquisition

of Switzerland’s Syngenta AG.

>

>

State Grid Corporation of China’s U.S.

$12.4 billion acquisition of Brazil’s

CPFL Energia SA.

>

>

Bohai Financial Investment Holding’s

U.S. $10 billion acquisition of CIT

Group’s aircraft leasing assets.

Additionally, Chinese private-owned

companies (POEs), as well as private

equity and asset management firms,

have been participating much more in

overseas M&A deals. For instance, POEs

and asset management firms from China

denoted 66% and 21%, respectively, of

the total investors who invested into

overseas markets in 2016. By contrast,

the total number of M&A deals made by

China’s state-owned enterprises (SOEs)

in 2016 stood at 13%.

SOEs in particular

China’s SOEs commenced their

internationalization strategies decades

ago and much has been achieved in

the years since. In September 2015, the

Central Committee of the CPC and State

Council issued a de-facto plan for SOEs

to further reform (titled “Guidelines

to Deepen Reforms of SOEs”). The

blueprint stated that, “SOE reforms aim

WHAT OCCUPIERS WANT

According to the Hurun

and DealGlobe report, the

number of these deals in

2016 increased 21% from

the previous year to reach

438 deals.

50 The Occupier Edge