Previous Page  167 / 264 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 167 / 264 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

AUGUST/SEPTEMBER

apprentice has well and truly served his apprenticeship?

Perhaps some of the existing affidavits and

declarations might be dispensed with. Perhaps all

Solicitors might be given the powers of Commissioners

for all but some kinds of affidavit. It is worth more than

just a thought.

Solicitors as Employers

The right of an Employer to terminate, subject to giving

statutory, contractual or reasonable notice, without

reason, the employment of any Employee has ended with

the Unfair Dismissals Act 1977. This Act provides that

an Employee who is held to have been unfairly dismissed

within the meaning of the Act must either be re-instated

(either in his old position or in another suitable position)

or compensated for any financial loss contributable to the

dismissal.

"Unfair Dismissal" is not defined in the Act. Instead,

all dismissals are deemed to be unfair unless the Employer

can show that there were substantial grounds justifying

the dismissal or that the dismissal resulted wholly or

mainly from one or more of the following causes:—

i) The capability, competence or qualifications of the

employee for performing work of the kind which he

was employed by the employer to do,

ií) The conduct of the employee.

iii) The redundancy of the employee, and

iv) The employee being unable to work or continue to

work in the position which he held without

contravention (by him or by his employer) of a duty

or restriction imposed by or under any statute or

instrument made under statute.

Thus, where an employer now dismisses an employee

and this Act applies to such dismissal, the onus is on the

employer to show that the dismissal resulted wholly or

mainly from one of the above four cases or there were

other substantial grounds justifying the dismissal. It is

most likely that an employer seeking to dismiss an

unsatisfactory employee will seek to justify such dismissal

under paragraph (i) or (ii) above. It would thus seem

advisable in the future that an employer set out clearly at

the time of employment of a new employee the work

which he is being employed to do and that a letter of

appointment containing this description and other main

conditions of employment be given to all new employees.

In this connection, there is of course an obligation on

every employer, under section 9 (5) of the Minimum

Notice and Terms of Employment Act 1973 to furnish to

each employee within one month of the commencement of

the employment a written statement containing the

following particulars:

i) The date of commencement of the employment,

ii) The rate or method of calculation of his

remuneration,

iii) The length of interval between the times at which

remuneration is paid, whether weekly, monthly or any

other period,

iv) Any terms or conditions relating to hours of work or

overtime,

v) Any terms or conditions relating to

a) Holidays and holiday pay,

b) Incapacity for work due to sickness or injury and

sick pay,

c) Pensions and Pension Schemes,

vi) The period of notice which the employee is obliged to

132

give and entitled to receive to determine his contract

of employment, or (if the contract of employment is

for a fixed term) the date on which the contract

expires.

The Unfair Dismissals Act 1977 does not apply to

certain types of contract of employment. Many of these

are not of interest as they relate to special categories of

employment particularly in the public service. There are

three categories of contract excluded which are of

significant practical importance. The Act does not apply

to:-

i) A dismissed employee, who at the date of his

dismissal, had less than one year's continuous service

with the employer who dismissed him (except where

the dismissal results wholly or mainly from the

pregnancy of the eihployee). Continuous service is

computed in accordance with the first schedule to the

Minimum Notice and Terms of Employment Act

1973.

ii) Dismissal during the period when the employee is on

probation or undergoing training, provided his

contract of employment is in writing, the duration of

the probation or training is one year or less and is

specified in the contract,

iii) a) Dismissal where the employment was under a

contract of employment for a fixed term made

before 16th September 1976 and the dismissal

consisted only of the expiry of the term without it

being renewed under the same contract, or

b) Dismissal where the employment was under a

contract of employment for a fixed term or for a

specified purpose (being a purpose of such a kind

that the duration of the contract was limited but

was at the time of its making incapable of precise

ascertainment) and that the dismissal consisted

only of the expiry of the term without its being

renewed under the said contract or the cesser of

the purpose and the contract is in writing, or

signed by or on behalf of the employer and the

employee and provides that this Act shall not

apply to a dismissal consisting only of the expiry

of cesser aforesaid.

The only practical difference between (i) and (ii) above

would appear that under (i) dismissal on grounds of

pregnancy during the first year of employment would

bring the dismissal within the Act whereas under (ii) the

Act would not apply to a dismissal on these grounds

during a period of probation. It may thus be advisable in

the employment of new female employees to include in a

written contract of employment a probationary period up

to one year.

An employee who has been dismissed in circumstances

to which the Act applies may appeal to the Employment

Appeals Tribunal (formally the Redundancy Appeals

Tribunal) or the Rights Commissioner who may make

orders for the reinstatement of the employee to his former

position, the re-engagement of the employee by the

employer to a different position or the payment by the

employer to the employee of such compensation (not

exceeding an amount of 104 weeks remuneration) in

respect of any financial loss incurred by him and

attributable to the dismissal as is just and equitable having

regard to all these circumstances.

An excellent lecture on the Unfair Dismissals Act 1977

and other related topics was given by Ercus Stewart,

Barrister-at-Law, to the Society in Tralee in April last.

The script of this lecture is available.