Previous Page  82 / 264 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 82 / 264 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

APRIL 1977

CRIMINAL LAW

Nolle prosequi

Entry — Statute requiring entry to be

made prior to indictment being

preferred to jury —Whether further

prosecution permissible — Whether

used as a device to set aside ruling of

trial Judge at abortive trial —

Criminal Justice (Admin.) Act, 1924,

S. 12 - (1976 No. 307 SS - Finlay

P. - 4/2/77).

The State (O'Callaghan)

v.

Ó

hUadhaigh.

Prosecution

Authority to initiate — Director of

Public Prosecutions — Further

prosecution after entry of nolle

prosequi in former proceedings —

Adverse ruling of trial Judge —

Further prosecution prohibited —

(1976 No. 307 SS - Finlay P. -

4/2/77).

The State (O'Callaghan)

v.

Ó

hUadaigh.

Prosecution

Authority to initiate — Summary

charges brought in the name of The

People and at the Suit of the Director

of Public Prosecutions — No express

authority to prosecute given by

D.P.P. —District Justice had power

to determine charges — Decision of

High Court (10/12/76) overruled -

(1 / 1977 - Supreme Court -

25/2/77).

The People (D.P.P.) v. Roddy.

Road Traffic

Insurance — User of motor vehicle

without insurance — Presumption of

contravention where unsuccessful

demand for production of insurance

policy made under S. 69 of Act —

Presumption available against owner

where unsuccessful demand made

against user — Road Traffic Act,

1961, SS. 56, 69 - (66/1976 -

Supreme Court - 23/2/77).

Lyons

v.

Cooney.

EVIDENCE

Admissibility

Tribunal — Natural justice — Medical

report as prima facie evidence —

Improperly used as superior to sworn

evidence to contrary effect — Descent

of medical assessor into arena behind

back of appellant - Social Welfare

(Insurance Appeals) Regulations,

1952 - Social Welfare Act, 1952, S.

44 (93/1973 - Supreme Court -

16/2/77).

Kiely v. Minister for Social Welfare.

Gift

Chattels — Delivery essential proof—

Constructive delivery — Life tenant

entering into possession of part of

settled property —Life tenant being

intended donee — (3/1975 —

Supreme Court - 23/2/77).

Conner v. Quintan.

Presumption

Criminal law — Road traffic — User

of motor vehicle without insurance —

S t a t u t o ry p r e s ump t i on of

contravention where unsuccessful

demand made under S. 69 for

production of insurance policy —

Presumption available against owner

where unsuccessful demand made to

user - Road Traffic Act, 1961, SS.

56, 69 - (66/1976 - Supreme Court

- 23/2/77).

Lyons

v.

Cooney.

NATURAL JUSTICE

Tribunal

Evidence — Medical report as prima

facie evidence — Improperly used as

superior to sworn evidence to

contrary effect — Descent of medical

assessor into arena behind back of

appellant — Social Welfare

(Insurance Appeals) Regulations,

1952 - Social Welfare Act, 1952, S.

44 - (93/1973 - Supreme Court -

16/2/77).

Kiely v. Minister for Social Welfare.

PERSONAL PROPERTY

Chattels

Gift inter vivos — Proof —Delivery

essential —Life tenant entering into

possession of part of house —

Intended subjects of gift situate in all

parts of house — Constructive

delivery — Inquiry as to which

chattels existing at time of inchoate

gift were situate in life tenant's

portion of house at date of

constructive delivery - (3/1975 —

Supreme Court - 23/2/77).

Conner v. Quintan.

POLICE

Dismissal

Recruit — Initial probationary period

of two years - Power of

Commissioner to dispense with

services of probationer during such

period — Power exercisable if

Commissioner considers recruit

physically or mentally unfit or not

likely to become efficient and well

conducted - Recruit absent through

sickness for 39 days — Termination

invalid - (1976 No. 421P -

McWilliam J. - 19/11/76).

Hynes v. Garvey.

SALE OF GOODS

Cattle

Intervention price — Contract before

announcement of intervention price

— Conflict of evidence about whether

seller entitled to all intervention price

— Seller's version of contract

accepted - (1975 No. 1580 -

McWilliam J. - 15/12/76).

Achates Investment Co. v. Cork Co-

operative Marts.