Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  7 / 9 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 7 / 9 Next Page
Page Background

1328 

B

rown

et al

.

:

J

ournal of

AOAC I

nternational

V

ol

. 97, N

o

. 5, 2014

both 0.09 µg/mL, and the LOQs were 0.23 and 0.21 µg/mL,

respectively (Table 2).

Precision

From the nine test materials used in this study, five test

materials (TM2, TM3, TM5, TM6, and TM8) were above the

LOQ and had a HorRat range of 0.3 to 2.0 and RSDr values of

0.61–8.64% as summarized in Table 3. Three of the test materials

(TM1, TM7, and TM9) were below the LOQ but were detected,

and the one test material (TM4) was below the LOD; therefore,

no HorRat and RSD

r

values were reported for these materials.

Accuracy

The average recovery range of aloin A and aloin B in both

solid and liquid matrixes was 84.41–108.86% with an RSD

r

of

0.15–8.64%. Tables 4a and b contain the summarized results for

each individual aloin at the three different concentration levels.

Stability of Mixed Standard

The stability of the aloins in reference standards, as well as

test material solutions, was found to be higher with the addition

of an acid. It was determined during method optimization that

0.1% acetic acid was adequate to provide good peak shape and

retain analyte stability over a period of time.

Storage of the aloin reference standards with the addition of

an acid provided consistent peak area after 48 h when exposed

to room temperature conditions with an average difference of

2–3% mAu*s. In the nonacidified solutions, the aloins started

to degrade after 8 h at room temperature, and with an average

difference of 23–28% mAu*s after 48 h from the initial time

point.

Conclusions

This method for the determination of aloin A and aloin B in

raw materials and select finished products containing

A.

vera

leaf juice was subjected to an SLV study according to AOAC

INTERNATIONAL guidelines. All parameters investigated

in the validation study were in compliance with the AOAC

INTERNATIONAL guidelines. The described method is thus

considered to be suitable for its purpose and ready for further

validation studies.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge Aloecorp (Ontario, CA),

International Aloe Science Council (Silver Spring, MD) and

Mark Roman from Tampa BayAnalytical Research (Tampa Bay,

FL) for providing the materials for this study. In addition, we

would like to acknowledge the ChromaDex for supplying the

reference standards used in the validation study.

References

 (1) Haller, J.S. (1990)

Bull. N.Y. Acad. Med

.

66

, 647–659

 (2) Farnsworth, N.R. (1995)

NAPRALERT Database

, University

of Illinois at Chicago, IL, an on-line database available directly

through the University of Illinois at Chicago or through the

Scientific and Technical Network (STN) of Chemical Abstracts

Services

 (3) Hecht, A. (1981)

FDA Consumer Updates

(Issue July-Aug)

15

,

26–29

 (4) Tyler, V.E., Bradley, L.R., & Robbers, J.E. (1998) in

Pharmacognosy

, 9th Ed., Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, PA, pp

62–63

 (5) Bradley, P.R. (1992) in

British Herbal Compendium,

Vol. 1,

British Herbal Medicine Association, Bournemouth, UK, pp

199–203

 (6) Reynolds, J.E.F. (1993) in

Martindale, the Extra

Pharmacopoeia

, 30th Ed., Pharmaceutical Press, London, UK,

p. 903

 (7) Blumenthal, M. (1998) in

The Complete German Commission

E Monographs: Therapeutic Guide to Herbal Medicines

,

12

,

80–81

 (8) Beuers, U., Spengler, U., & Pape, G.R. (1991)

Lancet

, 337–472

 (9) Bottenberg, M.M., Wall, G.C., Harvey, R.L., & Habib, S. (2007)

Ann. Pharmacother

.

41

, 1740–1743.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1345/

aph.1K132

(10) NTP Draft Technical Report TR577 (2011) on the Toxicology

and Carcinogenesis Studies of a Non-Decolorized Whole leaf

extract of

Aloe barbadensis

Miller (

Aloe vera

in F344/N Rats

and B6C3F

1

Mice–Drinking Water Study).

https://niehs.nih.

gov/news/assets/docs_f_o/ntp_draft_technical_report_577_a_

nondecolorized_whole_leaf_extract_of_aloe_barbadensis_

miller_aloe_vera_508.pdf (accessed January 11, 2013)

(11) International Aloe Science Council (February 2011) IASC

Reference Version 1.0 FAQ.

http://www.iasc.org/faq.html

(accessed January 11, 2013)

(12) Dell’Agli, M., Giavarini, F., Ferraboschi, P., Galli, G., & Bosisio,

E. (2007)

J. Agric. Food Chem.

55

, 3363–3367.

http://dx.doi

.

org/10.1021/jf070182h

(13) El Sohly, M., Gul, W., Avula, B., & Khan, I.A. (2007)

J. AOAC

Int.

90

, 28–42

(14) Fanali, S., Aturki, Z., D’Orazio, G., Rocco, A., Ferranti, A.,

Mercolini, L., & Raggi, M.A. (2010)

J. Sep. Sci.

33

, 2663–2670.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jssc.201000408

(15) Zahn, M., Trinh, T., Jeong, M.L., Wang, D., Abeysinghe, P., Jia,

Q., & Ma, W.A (2008)

Phytochem. Anal.

19

, 122–126. http://

dx.doi.org/10.1002/pca.1024

(16) Zonta, F., Bogoni, P., Masotti, P., & Micali, G. (1995)

J.

Chromatogr. A

718

, 99–106.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0021-

9673(95)00637-0

(17) Upton, R., Axentiev, P., & Swisher, D. (Eds) (2013)

American

Herbal Pharmacopoeia and Therapeutic Compendium

, AHP,

Scott’s Valley, CA, pp 30–33

(18) 

Guidelines for Single Laboratory Validation of Chemical

Methods for Dietary Supplements and Botanicals

(2003) AOAC

INTERNATIONAL, Gaithersburg MD

(19) Wernimont, G.T. (1987) in

Use of Statistics to Develop and

Evaluate Analytical Methods

, W. Spendley (Ed.), AOAC

INTERNATIONAL, Gaithersburg, MD