Previous Page  9 / 330 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 9 / 330 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

1986 INDEX

STAGG

v.

WYATT,

(1838) 2 Jur. 892, 9 -2 53, 254,

256

STATE (ABENGLEN) v. DUBLIN CORPORATION,

11982] ILRM 590, 10 -286

STATE (CLARKE) v. ROCHE AND SENEZIO, Supreme

Court, unreported, 12 Dec. 1986,

(edl.),

10 -279

STATE (LYNCH) v. COONEY,

[1983] ILRM 89, 10 -286 '

STATE TRADING CORP. OF INDIA LTD. v. E.D. & F.

MAN (SUGAR) LTD., [1981] Com.L.R. 235, C.A.,

6

-174

SWISS BANK CORP. v. LLOYDS BANK LTD., [ 1 980]

3 W.L.R. 457, 2 -52, 53

TRADAX v. IRISH GRAIN BOARD,

[1984] ILRM 471, 6 169, 1 76n

TURPIN v. BILTON,

(1845) 5 Man & G. 455, 10 -299

UNITED CITY MERCHANTS (INVESTMENTS) LTD. v.

ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, [19821 1 Q.B. 242, 2

-56; [1983] A.C. 168, 6 -17

UNITED TRADING CORP. S.A. v. ALLIED ARAB BANK

LTD.,

The Times,

18 July 1984, 7 -197, 198-201

VAUGHAN v. COTTINGHAM,

[1961] I.R. 184, 1 -23

WALLIS'S HOLIDAY CAMP v. SHELL-MEX

[1975] 1 Q.B. 94, 5 -142, 143

WARD v. McMASTER & LOUTH CO. COUNCIL, High

Court, 26 April 1985, 2 -37, 41

WARNOCK v. REVENUE COMMRS.,

[1986] ILRM 37,

8

-228

WATSON v. FRAM REINFORCED CONCRETE CO.

(SCOTLAND), [ 1960], S.C. 92, 3 -77

WILKINSON v. COVERDALE

(1793) 1 Esp. 74, 10 -299

WILLIAMS BROTHERS DIRECT SUPPLY LTD. v.

RAFTERY [1958] 1 Q.B. 159, 5 -142-3

WILSON, SMITHETT & COPE LTD. v. TERRIZZI.

[1976] 1 Q.B. 683. 2 -54. 5, 56

YOLLAND, HUSSON & BIRKETT LTD.,

In re.,

[1908] 1 Ch. 152, 10 -282

YOUNG v. PHILLIPS

[1984] S.T.C. 520, 7 -212

10