Previous Page  15 / 88 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 15 / 88 Next Page
Page Background

Reading Matters

Research Matters

CLICK HERE TO RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

Reading Matters | Volume 16 • Winter 2016 |

scira.org

|

13

|

their math journal:

I remember

(Can you use your prior knowledge

to connect this book or concept to another one?);

I notice

(Did

the story offer a new way of thinking about the concept we are

learning about?);

I wonder

(Did this book make you think of a

question, or are you more curious about a concept than before?).

After spending a few minutes writing, the students either shared

their entries with a partner or sometimes they shared with

the entire class. Murphy (1999) suggested that picture books

not only engage children and help them make mathematical

connections, but they also provide visualization of mathematical

concepts in the illustrations. Rogers, Cooper, Nesmith, and

Purdum-Cassidy (2015) add that including children’s literature

provides a natural context for the sharing of mathematics. When

students wrote in their journals after they listened to a poem or

picture book, they actively communicated their understanding

or lack thereof. Thus this served as an authentic way for me to

assess whether the students were able to grasp the concept,

or not, as I observed and noted their responses to the story.

After each mathematical literacy experience, I wrote detailed

field notes regarding how I felt about the lesson, how the

students responded, whether students seemed to benefit

from the shared reading, and any thoughts I had about what I

could do differently next time. Daily reflections helped me to

continuously evaluate the students’ learning needs and revise

my instruction to support the students’ understanding.

Data analysis in this teacher research study occurred in three

phases. In Phase I, I identified examples from student work and

field notes that related to my research question, coded data

for themes, and organized the data electronically in a matrix to

make searches, sorting, and retrieval easier. In Phase II, I charted

my codes, specific examples, and the student associated with

the code, recognizing that certain events or statements might

be coded several ways. In Phase III, I used cross case analysis to

compare students and better understand the larger phenomenon

of incorporating children’s literature into a content area class.

First Grade Findings

In this section I share four students’ stories: Jack, Kate, Ben

and Ellie (all pseudonyms). First, I introduce each student

and share his or her understanding of math concepts as well

as their dispositions towards the subject. Next, I describe

their individual reactions to the incorporation of children’s

literature into the math class and one salient theme that

resonated across all of the data collected from that particular

student. Finally, I share some of my notes about the student

as the year progressed. My hope is that by reading about

their experiences and my own reflections on their progress,

educators will see how skills can transfer across content

areas, consider new ways to differentiate and recognize the

importance of incorporating children’s literature into math time.

Jack: avid reader and unconfident

mathematician

In the baseline survey, Jack responded that he could not get

good grades in math, however, his responses on the thumbs up

slips regarding children’s literature were very positive, showing

the books helped him understand the mathematical concepts.

Jack preferred reading and writing to math, so when math time

incorporated literacy skills he enjoyed it more. After we read Pigs

will be

Pigs: Fun with Math and Money

(Axelrod, 1997), he wrote

in his journal:

I remember when I found a nickel and penny just

like the pigs did in the hot air duct.

Jack used the reading strategy

of making connections to try to relate math to his own life.

Research shows that increased access to a variety of texts

can better motivate students who have a strong interest in the

topics addressed in such texts (Jobe & Dayton-Sakari, 2002).

For Jack, incorporating children’s literature into mathematics

joined an activity he thought of as favorable (reading) with

one he did not feel as successful in (math). Jack’s overall

reading ability and his self-confidence grew to the point where

his negative feelings towards math lessened. In one of his

last journal entries of the year he wrote:

Math is not bad.

Looking over my field notes, I recognized that many of the

students were like Jack and their responses were mostly positive

towards the incorporation of children’s literature during math

throughout the year. In my research journal, I wrote about enjoying

the days I used picture books more than days I did not. In one entry

I describe the students’ reaction to

The Greedy Triangle

(Burns, 1994).

The Greedy Triangle was a big hit. Not only did they enjoy

the book, but I also really think it helped their understanding.

Jack, who always looks so disinterested during math, was on the

edge of his seat waiting to say the name of the next shape.

Kate, strong reader and mathematician

Kate believed that she could do math, get good grades in

math and gave all thumbs up on her slips, showing she had a high

confidence level in mathematics. Kate enjoyed the math books,

and may have benefited from them, but she probably would have

had the same positive reaction towards math with or without

the books. After we read the poem“Smart” (Silverstein, 1974),

she wrote in her math journal:

In (the poem) Smart, I noticed that

he did not add right. He just wanted more coins.

Kate was able to

understand the money concepts presented in “Smart” and express

the greed of the child in the poem. Incorporating poetry into math

class encouraged Kate to join math concepts and logical reasoning.

When children’s literature is used as way of introducing a

manipulative, students may see the manipulative as a tool for

exploring the math concept as opposed to a device for obtaining

an answer (Van de Walle, Karp, & Bay-Williams, 2010). For example,

when I taught the money unit, I used texts such as

Money

(Crib,

1990),

If you Made a Million

(Schwartz, 1989) and

A Chair for My

Mother

(Williams, 1982). By sharing these texts with my class

and using the coins as manipulatives, I provided an opportunity

for the students to further understand the concept of authentic

purpose for listening – to obtain information that they needed to

know. The books also reminded the students about the real world

applications of this concept. At the same time, students enjoyed

being read children’s literature outside of the literacy block.