Previous Page  148 / 424 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 148 / 424 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

MAY/JUNE

1995

it is unable to pay its debts, either at the

commencement of the winding up or at

any time, he shall report those matters,

i.e. the fact a restricted person was a

director and the insolvent position of

the company, to the court which then

may impose disqualification

47

. Again

failure to so report can lead to a

maximum fine of £1,000

4

\

Consequently the provisions cover the

scenario where a liquidator, or

receiver, of the company which lead

to the restriction declaration, is

unaware that the interests of the

second company, or its creditors, had

been jeopardised by the presence of

the Board of the restricted person, and

therefore made no report to the court

under section 151. It should be noted

that the penalty only arises where the

person under restriction was a

director, and not merely a promoter or

secretary of the second company.

Finally the five year time period runs

from the date of the first company's

winding up and not from the date of

the restriction order.

Enforcement is therefore by potential

disqualification on persons restricted

and by placing liquidators in the

position of watchdog and guardian of

other companies' and their creditors',

interests.

*Part II will be published in the next

issue of the

Gazette.

References

1991

1. Re Travel Mondial ( U K ) Limited

B C L C 120.

2. Ibid p. 123.

3. IS 117/1991.

4. Including any foreign c o m p a ny established

in the State, s. 149(4).

5.

S

.149( 1 ) C o m p a n i es Act. 1990.

6. s.l 54.

7. T h e C o m p a n i es Bill provided lor a.

". . . receiver of the whole or substantially

the whole of the property of a company. . . "

but c o n c e rn as to what constituted

substantially the w h o l e' and that a receiver

would have to decide lead to the alteration,

tDail Special C o mm i t t ee Debate Col. 7.39.

29/3/90).

8. Re T a s b i an Limited | 1989| B C L C 7 2 0.

9. As defined in s.27.

It), s . l 4 9 ( 5 ).

1 I. O'Higgins C.J. Hamilton t\ Hamilton

[ 1 9 8 2] IR 4 6 6 , 4 7 4 and expressly approved

by Murphy J. in

Re Hefferon Kearns (No.

I)

//99.?/

J IR

177.

12. s. 160( 1 ).

13. s. 1 6 0 ( 2 ).

20

29.

30.

31.

32.

33.

34.

35.

36.

37.

38.

39.

4 0.

4 1.

4 2.

4 3.

4 4 .

4 5 .

4 6.

4 7.

4 8.

S

. 2 9 7A (as amended).

s.l 5 3 ( 4 ).

ss. 160( 1) & (2).

C D D A 1 9 86 s.6( 1 )(b).

C o m p a n i es Director Disqualification Act.

1 9 86 s.6(4).

Re S e v e n o a ks Stationers (Retail) Ltd.

11990| 3 W L R 1 165. I 169.

s.l 5 0 ( 3 ).

Minister for Enterprise & E m p l o y m e n t.

s.l 58.

s.l 5 8 ( c ).

s. 156(6).

S

.156( I).

s.l 5 6 ( 3 ).

s.l 5 5 ( 5 ).

Gerard M c C o r m a ck " D i r e c t or

Disqualification and R e s t r i c t i o n" Irish Law

T i m e s July 1 9 89 p. 168.

s.l 5 5 ( 5 ).

s. 160( 1 ) (a).

s. 155( 1).

s.l 5 5 ( 5 ).

s.l 5 5 ( 2 ).

s.l 5 5 ( 3 ).

ss. 1 5 5 ( 3) (a) & (b).

s.l 5 5 ( 4 ).

s . l 5 7( 1).

s . 1 5 8 ( 2 ).

By virtue of s. 154.

s. 15 1(3).

s.l 52.

s. 152(5).

S

. 1 6 K 1).

s . 1 6 1 ( 2 ).

s. 162.

s. 161(4).

s . 1 6 1 ( 5 ).

s.l 61 (5).

The Irish

Society For

European Law

Monday 22nd May, 1995

at 6.30 p.m. in Newman

House, St. Stephen's

Green Dublin 2

Vincent Power,

Solicitor

on the Recent Judgment of

the European Court of

Justice on Abuse of a

Domi nant Position

Magill: Competition or

Copyright?

Confusion or Clarification ?

W A R N I N G

Re : " N i g e r i a n

L e t t e r s "

Solicitors should note scams,

with a Nigerian connection. Irish

solicitors have received letters

with a Nigerian address, where

the solicitor is made a

proposition. The fraudsters

typically claim to be government

officials attempting to unlock

funds which have become

'trapped' during a previous

regime. They also claim that

because they are civil servants

they are unable to deal directly

with the funds but must seek 'an

overseas partner' into whose

account they will transfer

millions of US dollars.

The solicitor is typically offered

3 0% of the amount and asked to

send copies of the firm's headed

notepaper and invoices stamped

and signed, and the firm's bank

details. The fraudsters can then

use the bank account to remove

money from the account.

B E W A R N E D .

SOLICITORS

CONFIDENTIAL

HELPLINE

IN

1 9 94

OVER 2 50 SOLICITORS

NEEDED HELP

THEY RANG

284 84

84

NEED HELP?

JOST CALL

284 84

84

124