Previous Page  232 / 424 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 232 / 424 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

B O O K

R E V I E W S

JULY 1995

l l l l l l/ll

Gill & Macmi l l an Anno t a t ed

Cons t i tut ion of I r e l and With

Comme n t a ry

Edited by J.Anthony Foley and

Stephen Lalor. Published by Gill &

Macmillan, Dublin 1995, Softback,

pp353. £14-99.

In his Foreword to this work, Mr.

Justice O'Flaherty points out that for

any new book to be worthwhile, it

must either deal with entirely new

subject matter not previously covered,

or adopt a new perspective on a

subject already established.

There have been, of course, over the

years, many learned commentaries on

the Irish Constitution. This book does

not purport to compete with the

mainstream legal texts on the subject

(there are, for example, very few

references to decided cases), nor does

it deal with the political background

to the drafting of the Constitution.

Rather, the specific focus of this

commentary is on the development of

the Constitution through its various

amendments.

Since the Constitution was adopted in

1937, there have been thirteen

amendments made to it, one in 1939,

one in 1941 and all the rest since

1972. The book contains a complete

collated text of the Constitution

incorporating these amendments.

There is a clever method of

presentation which shows the original

text, the parts of it which have been

deleted, and those parts which have

been added. It is thus possible at a

glance to ascertain what the text of

the Constitution was at any given

time. This brings the book up to

page 160.

The second half of the book goes

through the various amending Acts

208

and contains selected extracts from

the Oireachtas debates which describe

the background to each amendment.

As the editors, who are both Civil

Servants, point out in their Preface,

these extracts were chosen "to be

either representative or interesting.

Sometimes a lone voice made a point

not touched upon by other speakers

but which seemed to be of interest. On

other occasions, brief reference was

made to very diverse areas of interest

and it seemed necessary to mention

these subjects in passing only".

Appendices deal with the development

of judicial awareness of the

Constitution, the 1967 Report of the

Committee on the Constitution and a

Chronology of significant dates and

events.

This book will undoubtedly be of

value to those interested in Irish

history generally and in the Irish

Constitution, its history and

development in particular. It is a

useful reference source for

information not readily found

j elsewhere. Statistics of the total

electorate, total poll, votes for and

against etc. show the support for each

of the constitutional amendments.

Proposed amendments which were not

passed are also described.

As for the legal practitioner, as

previously mentioned, this book does

not purport to compete with the

established legal texts, nor does it do

so. However, the collated text of the

Constitution is certainly a useful

; feature. The extracts from the

Oireachtas debates provide " a flavour

o f the legislative arena from which the

constitutional amendments emanated".

They provide an understanding of the

background to the amendments

! which should be of assistance to

practitioners in crafting arguments

for future cases.

Karl Hayes

Terrell on the Law of

Pa t en ts

Fourteenth Edition, Sweet &

Maxwell, Hardback, 1040pp.

Stg£148.00.

The many previous editions of this

work indicate that Terrell is regarded

by lawyers and patent attorneys alike

as the standard text-book on patents.

Until the thirteenth edition the work

was equally so regarded by Irish

practitioners. That edition and the one

under review are perhaps of less

relevance because of the sweeping

changes made by the UK Patents Act,

1977 and latterly by the Irish Patents

Act, 1992. The thirteenth edition

appeared in 1982 and was the first to

deal with the 1977 Act. The thirteenth

edition appeared in 1982 and was the

first to deal with the 1977 Act. Be f o re

then there was little difference in

substance between the now repealed

UK Patents Act, 1949 and its repealed

Irish counterpart, the Patents Act,

1964; apart from the rather innovative

Irish provisions of the time on the

question of absolute novelty. There

are now greater differences between

the respective countries' legislation

even though in substance both still

remain similar. Thus the UK 1977 Act

contains elaborate provisions in

relation to employees' inventions and

the compensation allowable to

employees for inventions devised by

them but which legally belong to their

employers. No such provisions exist

in the Irish 1992 Act. Conversely, the

Irish legislation allows for the grant of

"Short term" patents, i.e., patents

granted for ten years duration for

inventions without the need on

application to satisfy the Patents

Office of the novelty of the invention.

Short term patent protection is not

available under the UK Act.

The Irish Controller's Sixty-Sixth

Annual Report for year 1993