Previous Page  266 / 424 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 266 / 424 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 1995

there will be questions arising in the

, future over the recognising of foreign

degrees, diplomas and qualifications.

A solicitor should be familiar with the

jurisprudence of the European courts

in this a r e a ."

Marketing

Quite frequently, Irish solicitors are

consulted about labelling and marking

requirements both

offensively

in terms

o f products which are to be exported

from Ireland to elsewhere in the EU

and

defensively

trying to stop the

importation into Ireland o f products

from elsewhere in the EU.

Agriculture

It is surprising that in a country with

as strong an agricultural base as

Ireland that there has not been more

work for Irish solicitors in the area of

EC agricultural law.

34

Milk quotas and

headage payments have provided

some work but other areas seem to be

terra incognita.

%

Consumer Protection Law

Solicitors who do consumer protection

work ought to be very much aware of

the jurisprudence of the European

Courts as well as the measures

adopted on such issues as product

liability, product safety, advertising,

timeshares, doorstep selling,

consumer credit, unfair contract terms

and package holidays.

Contract Disputes

With the growth o f international

contracts, there is no doubt that the

R ome Convention of 1 9 80 will be of

more assistance and interest to

lawyers.

Transport

Transport is an extremely important

area o f EU law. Transport represents

7 % of the combined GDP o f the EU

which is more than agriculture. Irish

road hauliers as well as Irish aviation

and shipping companies provide work

to Irish solicitors in this area. Mo re

importantly, some Irish solicitors are

now advising international clients in

the area o f EU transport law.

242

j Intellectual Property

Patents, trademark, copyright and

| other intellectual property rights

i

cannot be seen solely in the light of

i

national law. Recent cases such as

j

Magill

clearly demonstrate that a

solicitor advising on intellectual

property cannot ignore EC

competition law.

Welfare

j

| Welfare law has been a growth area in

j

recent years and Irish solicitors who

deal with private clients should

familiarise themselves with the

jurisprudence of the European courts

as welfare law.

35

Fisheries

EC fisheries law is particularly

j

important in Ireland. Solicitors in

coastal areas should be familiar with

EC fisheries law. While there are

solicitors with excellent reputations

j

in the subject, there is still room

for others!

|

Conclusion

I There are many other opportunities

j

! for the solicitor to apply the

j

jurisprudence of the European Courts

in practices. This article has only

examined a few o f the cases.

Part II o f this article will be published

j

in the October issue o f the Gazette.

*Vincent Power is a solicitor in A&L

Goodbody, Solicitors. He practises in

the firm's EU and Competition Law

Department.

References

1. The term "European Union" or " EU" is

used in this paper to include the combined

legal regimes of the European Community,

the European Coal and Steel Community,

the European Atomic Energy Community

as well as the Treaty on European Union.

2. The term "European Courts" is used in this

article to describe the Court of Justice of

j

the European Communities ("ECJ") and the

j

Court of First Instance ("CFI").

|

3. See Van Hamme, "Human Rights and the

!

Treaty of Rome" and Power, "Human

j

Rights and the EEC" in Heffernan (ed.)

Human Rights: A European

Perspective

|

(1994) at pages 70 and 81.

j

4. A case with an interesting Irish angle was

Chief Adjudication Officer v Twomey

\

[ 1992] 2 CMLR 571. Other examples

j

include

Warmerdamesteggerda

[1991] 2

CMLR 86;

Newton

v

Chief

Adjudication

Officer [

1992] 1 CMLR 149;

Johnson

fl991 ] 3 CMLR 917; and

Clarke v Chief

Adjudication Officer

[1987] 3 CMLR 277.

5. O'Caoimh and Barry, "The Development of

the Free Movement of Persons towards

European Citizenship" (1993) IJEL 98.

6. E.g. cases such as

Secretary of State for

Social Security

v

Thomas

[1993] 3 CMLR

880.

7. Including the right to sue a Member State

for damages for failure to implement a

Directive; see Joined Cases C-6/90 and C-

9 / 90

Francovich and Bonifaci

v

Italian

Republic

[1991] ECR 1-5357, [1992] IRLR

84.

8. Act No. 24 of 1991.

9. Case C-106/8 [1992] 1 CMLR 305, [1992]

IRLR 84.

10. Emmott v The Minister for Social Welfare

[1991] 3 CMLR 894, [1991] IRLR 387.

11. Case C-106/89

Marleasing

v

La

Comercial

International de Alimentacion SA

[1990]

ECR 1-4135, [1992] 1 CMLR 305, [1992]

IRLR 84 and Case 14/83

Von Colson

v

Land Nordrhein-Wesfalen

[1984] ECR 311,

[1986] 2 CMLR 430.

12. E.g.

Grogan v SPUC

[1991] 3 CMLR 849.

j

13. Koopmans, "The Future of the Court of

j

Justice of the European Communities"

(1991) 11

YEL

15 at 15.

14. Case 186/87

Cowan

v

Le Tresor Public

[1989] ECR 195, [1990] 2 CMLR 613 and

Meagher

v

Minister for Agriculture

and

Food

[1994] 1 IR 329, [1994] I ILRM 1.

15. See above.

16. EC Treaty, Art.6.

17. EC Treaty, Art.48.

18. See Dir. 68/360, Arts. 2 and 3. See Case C- j

113/89

Rush Portugesa Limitada

v

ONI

[1990] ECR 1-1417, [1991] 2 CMLR 818.

19. Dir. 68/360, Art. 2.

20. EC Treaty, Art. 52.

21

. Grogan

v

Society for the Protection of the

Unborn Child [

1991] 3 CMLR 849; Cases

286/82 and 26/83

Luisi and Carbone v

Ministero de Tesero

[1984] ECR 377,

[1985] 3 CMLR 52; and

Cowan v Tresor

Public

see above.

22. See

East

v

Cuddy and Cuddy,

Circuit

Court, Sheehy J., unreported, 11th Nov.

1985.

23. EC Treaty, Art. 85(1).

24. EC Treaty, Act. 85(2).

25. EC Treaty, Art. 85 (3).

26. A comparable (but not identical) provision

is contained in Art. 65 of the ECSC Treaty.

27. A comparable (but not identical) provision

is contained in Art. 66 of the ECSC Treaty.

28. Unreported Decision of the European

Commission, 16th May 1995.

29. McMahon and Murphy,

European

Community Law in Ireland

(1989), Chap.

12.

30. Cf.

Dunlea

v

Nissan

[1993] IJEL 146.

31. Dir. 77/187.

32. Case 113/80

EC Commission

v

Ireland

[1981] ECR 1625.

33. E.g. Case 222/86

UNECTEF v Heylens

[1987] ECR 4097, [1989] 1 CMLR 901 and

Case C-340/89

Vlassopoulou

v

Ministerium

Justiz

[1993] 2 CMLR 221.

34. See cases such as

An Bord Bainne Co-

operative Ltd v Minister for

Agriculture

( 1 9 8 7 )2 JIEL 37.

35. Cousins, "The EEC Social Security

Regulations in Ireland" (1992) 2 IJEL 105.