Previous Page  96 / 424 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 96 / 424 Next Page
Page Background

A new Law Centre was opened to the public by the Minister for Equality and Law Reform, Mr. Mervyn

Taylor, T.D., at Upper Mount Street, Dublin on 2 February.

Photo shows the Minister, Mervyn Taylor, (right), viewing facilities at the new centre, with Frank Brady,

Assistant Chief Executive, Ray Finucane, Solicitor in Charge, and Pierse Rayel, Chief Executive, Legal

Aid Board. Law Clerk Rachel Ward was providing the information.

SOLICITORS ACTS 1954 to 1994

A COMPENDIUM

The complete Solicitors Acts consolidated and referenced in one volume.

Available from:

Linda Dolan

The Law Society

Blackhall Place, Dublin 7.

Phone: 671 0711

Cost: £15 . 00 + p.p. £1 . 40

GAZETTE

M

EDI WH

MARCH1995

To Mrs. Rooney and her children goes

our deepest sympathy.

Ar dheis dé go raibh a ainm dhilis.

France. Desmond Junior is a solicitor in

the office of Arthur O'Hagan & Co., in

Dublin. Fergal is Chief Solicitor in the

Legal Aid Office in Limerick and Niall

is the County Registrar in Waterford.

Desmond Rooney carried on an

extensive practice for many years in

Galway City where he was widely

respected by his professional colleagues

and was held in the highest of esteem by

his many friends and clients whose

interests were always his primary con-

cern. He suffered greatly from ill health

for many years and this resulted in his

premature retirement from practice.

A love of the sea was one of the many

reasons why Desmond Rooney made his

home in Galway and in earlier years a

favourite hobby was sailing and he spent

many peaceful hours on Galway Bay.

His love of sailing was inherited by his

daughter Aideen. During the long years

of his illness, Desmond was faithfully

and lovingly cared for by his devoted

wife Sheila who gave unsparingly of her

time and herself and who was a great

comfort to him during difficult times.

He was very proud of her.

Desmond Finbar Rooney

An Appreciation

Continued from page 69

The Succession Act: S.117

and Life After Death

Continued from page 68

Conclusion

The following conclusions may be

drawn from the foregoing analysis:

1. It is appropriate to take into account

events after death which were

reasonably foreseeable within the

testator's lifetime:

Re N.S.M.

14

.

2. Despite the views expressed in

Re

J.H., deceased

15

and

Re J.H. de B.,

deceased,

16

it is not legitimate in

assessing the question of failure of

moral duty to consider unforeseeable

events which take place after the

death of the testator.

3. However, once a failure in moral

duty has been established, it is

permissible to consider the facts at

the date of the hearing in

determining what amounts to just

provision for the applicant:

M.P.D.

v

M.D:

1

References:

1. Striking practical examples of

circumstances changing after the testator's

death are provided by the Australian cases

of

In re Wheare

[1950] S.A.S.R. 61

(accident causing serious injury to

applicant) and

Re Forsaith

Dec 'd

( 1 9 2 6)

26 S.R. (N.S.W.) 6 1 3; 4 3 W.N. 171

(married daughter deserted by her

husband).

2. ( 1 9 7 2) 1 0 6 I . L . T . R. 82.

3. See e.g.

C.C. and Ch. F. v. W.C. and T.C.

[1990] 2 I.R. 143, 149.

4. ( 1 9 7 3) 107 I.L.T.R. 1.

5. Note the comments of Townley J. in the

Australian case of

Re Browne Dec'd

[1952] Q.S.R. 4 7 , 4 9 - 5 0: ' T o take into

consideration changes in circumstances

which could not have been foreseen by the

testator would be to attribute to him not

only wisdom and a sense of justice but also

the gift of prophecy."

6. [1984] I.R. 599.

7.

Ibid.,

607.

8.

Ibid.

9. [1991] 2 I.R. 105.

10.

Ibid.,

112.

11. [1981] I.L.R.M. 179, 188.

12. On the facts of the case, Carroll J. held that

she was precluded from making an order

by the fact that the relevant application

was made outside the time-limit laid down

in s.l 17(6), i.e. one year from the taking

out of representation.

1 3 . ( 1 9 5 6 ) 95 C.L.R. 494. For recent

confirmation of this approach in Australia,

see

e.g.

the decision of the Full Court of

the Supreme Court of South Australia in

Eckert

v

Starick

unreported, June 15 1994.

14. Supra.

15. Supra.

16.

Supra.

17. Supra.

*John Mee is a Lecturer in Property

and Equity Law, University College,

Cork.

72