Previous Page  38 / 88 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 38 / 88 Next Page
Page Background

38

S E P T E M B E R , 2 0 1 6

NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL SERVICES ACT —

BACK TO THE FUTURE

By Paul Leodori, Esq.

Law Offices of Paul Leodori, P.C.

© iStockphoto.com

Mr. Leodori is the managing attorney of the Law

Offices of Paul Leodori, P.C. in Medford, New Jersey

and he has been representing both community

association boards and individual members throughout

New Jersey for many years. He is Vice Chair of the

CAI-NJ Legislative Action Committee and frequently

lectures on community association issues and topics.

Courtesy CAI-NJ.

O

n January 3, 1990, an article in the Trenton Times

was captioned “Double Payments Scratched for

Condo Owners” claiming that “New Jersey

condominium owners tallied a huge victory yesterday

when legislation eliminating double payment for certain

municipal services was signed into law by Gov. Thomas

H. Kean.” And so the Municipal Services Act, N.J.S.A.

40:67-23-2 et seq. became law in New Jersey.

For the first time, the law required New Jersey municipali-

ties to reimburse qualified private communities for the costs

of certain municipal services not provided to the communi-

ties by the municipality, or alternatively, to actually provide

those services to the private communities.

The New Jersey League of Municipalities opposed this

bill claiming that local governments would be burdened

with additional costs. Additionally, other opponents of the

law, argued that community associations were intended to

be “self-sufficient” and thereby they exclusively responsible

to provide their own maintenance. Conversely, owners

in community associations claimed that the municipal tax

structure was discriminatory because the homeowners

were paying for services such as garbage pick-up and

street cleaning through municipal property taxes and again

through association maintenance fees.

Although the battle line was drawn in the legislature in

the 1980’s, with community associations on one side and

municipalities on the other, the war is not over. Many of

the initial issues debated more than twenty-five years ago

remain contentious today. The Municipal Services Act now

requires that the municipality provide the following service

or reimburse private communities for: (1) removal of snow,

ice and other obstructions from the roads and streets; (2)

lighting of the roads and streets, to the extent of payment

for the electricity required, but not including the installation

or maintenance of lamps, standards, wiring of or other

equipment; and (3) collection of leaves and recyclable

materials along the roads and streets and the collection or

disposal of solid waste along the roads and streets. See

N.J.S.A. 40:67-23.3.