Previous Page  8 / 80 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 8 / 80 Next Page
Page Background

6

M E D I C U S

A P R I L 2 0 1 6

L E T T E R S / I N D U S T R I A L

Continued from page 4

SNAPSHOTS

THE AMA (WA)

continues to raise with the

Minister for Health and the Director General

the disquiet expressed by members about

the lack of medical engagement in the

development of medical policy; contrary

to international evidence that engagement

with medical practitioners is a necessary

component to an efficient and safe healthcare

system where patient care outcomes are

maximised.

Decisions on key policy, governance and

service delivery in WA hospitals and health

service facilities are being made with little or no

involvement of practitioners or the community.

The principles of clinical engagement are

enshrined in departmental policy, as referred

to in WA Health’s Operational Directive

0287/2010 and also in the “Memorandum of

Understanding between the Minister for Health,

the Director General of Health and Boards of

Management and the AMA (WA) in respect of

Clinical Privileges, Conduct and Governance

in WA Government Hospitals and Health

Services”.

Members are entitled to participate in clinical

decision making and should contact the AMA if

this right is being overridden.

THE AMA (WA)

has become aware that a practice is

developing within the WA public sector whereby members

are having their clinical independence questioned; being

directed about how to treat a patient, which device to use

and so on.

Members are reminded that under the

Good Medical

Practice: A Code of Conduct for Doctors in Australia

published by the Medical Board of Australia, consistent with

the

Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (WA) Act

2009

(the National Law), a medical practitioner has a duty to

make the care of patients their first concern and to practise

medicine safely and effectively. They must be ethical and

trustworthy.

The WA Health credentialing policy is also based on verifying

the qualifications and experience of medical practitioners to

determine their ability to provide independent care.

Page 1 of OD 0287/2010 refers to:

Building on the National Standard, WA Health has

formulated a consistent approach for credentialing and

defining the scope of clinical practice of senior doctors

with independent responsibility for patient care to be

implemented in all WA publicly funded health services.

Accordingly, members should feel confident challenging

managers who seek to control or reduce clinical independence.

If in doubt, don’t hesitate to contact the AMA.

MEDICAL ENGAGEMENT

CLINICAL INDEPENDENCE

Dear Editor

Your news article in

Medicus

of March 2016 (Volume 56

Issue 2), highlighting the advances that have occurred

at Albany Health Campus in attracting high quality

specialists omitted to mention the presence of a Specialist

Anaesthetist. Dr Alice Poon, who has been a full-time

Consultant Anaesthetist at Albany Health Campus and

resident in Albany for the past five years has worked

tirelessly to improve the safety and quality of anaesthetic

care and acute pain management there. Her significant

contribution to continuing professional development

of the GP Anaesthetists and the theatre nurses at the

hospital should not go unnoticed. The difficulty in

attracting specialist Anaesthetists to country areas is

well documented with a significant maldistribution in this

specialty. If the contribution of these specialists is not

acknowledged, the problem will be perpetuated.

Sincerely,

Dr Debra Coleman

MB ChB FRACGP FANZCA MPH MHM

Significant contribution should not go unnoticed

WESTERN AU