Previous Page  333 / 364 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 333 / 364 Next Page
Page Background

tates of which his deceased was executor or trustee

and the position of the administration of these

estates, if any. Is it likely that the Revenue Com

missioners would seek to hold the last executor

responsible for duties payable out of previous

estates of which he knows nothing at the time

of taking out the grant to his testator? 1 should

be obliged if you will summarise the statutory

provisions under which estate, legacy and suc

cession duty become barred by lapse of time,

because this is a material consideration in con

nection with

the present problem. Will

the

Revenue Commissioners be barred if they fail to

put in a claim for outstanding death duties in

reply to a statutory notice to creditors on behalf

of the executor of testator B, the death duties

being chargeable on the estate of testator A of

whom B was executor?

15th February

1967,

Revenue Commissiov.ers to

Society :

Reference to your letter of 31st January.

I think it reasonable to assume that the papers

of a deceased executor would contain

inditia

which would alert his own executor to the exist

ence of the previous estate. The latter would

naturally have examined these for the purpose of

the extraction of his own grant. It seems to me

improbable that he would be entirely unaware

of the position.

In a case in which section 8 (3) of the Finance

Act 1894, might operate so that liability would

be limited to assets which the executor by chain

of representation has received or might "but for

his own neglect or default" have received, if there

had been assets which he might have got into his

own possession it would be a question of fact

whether his failure to do so was a consequence

of his own neglect or default. If he had been,

through no fault of his own, genuinely unaware of

the matter, and was no longer in a position to

get in the assets it appears to me that he could

rely on the section.

Debts due to the State are not bound by Lord

St. Leonard's Act and the Revenue Commissioners

are accordingly not affected by the publication

of a statutory notice to creditors. You may recall

that, in May 1960, this was the subject of a

discussion between your Society and the Revenue.

The following are the provisions which put

a time limit on claims for death duties :—

Legacy Duty and Succession Duty

Section 12 of the Customs and Inland Revenue

Act,

1889 protects purchasers and mortgagors

against claims for Succession Duty after the ex

piration of six years from the date of notice to

the Commissioners of the death which lets in the

succession or, in the absence of such notice, after

the expiration of twelve years from such death.

Section 12 of that Act bars a claim for duty

under a document (other than a testamentary

document) after the lapse of six years from date

of notice to the Commissioners of the fact which

gives rise to a claim for duty under the document

if an attested copy of the document has been

deposited with the Commissioners.

Section 14 of the same Act relates to claims

under a testamentary document admitted to pro

bate or under letters of administration. Lender

this section the limit is also six years from the

date of the settlement of the account in respect

of which duty is payable, provided the account

is a full and true one and is correct to the best

of the knowledge and belief of the accountable

party.

Estate Duty

The above provisions are applied

to Estate

Duty by Section 8 (2) of the Finance Act, 1894.

Generally

An accountable party is also, of course, pro

tected in respect of specified property by

the

issue of a certificate of discharge in respect of

that property. The relevant sections are Section

12 of the Customs and Inland Revenue Act 1880

(as to Legacy Duty and Succession Duty) and

Section

11

of

the Finance Act,

1894

(as

to

Estate Duty).

Correction

In the article of similar title in the last number

of the GAZETTE p. 106, col 1, line 22 for A read

E.

THE FUTURE PATTERN OF THE

PROFESSION

Part I

By SIR THOMAS LUND, C.B.E.

(Secretary to the Law Society, England)

Introduction

Gazing into the crystal ball is not to be recom

mended except when the vision is of the so far

distant future that the soothsayer can safely rely

upon having passed on by the time that the

truth is revealed. Nevertheless, the writer proposes

119