Previous Page  49 / 364 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 49 / 364 Next Page
Page Background

development and the retention of structures

which are unauthorised structures on ist

October, 1964.

(vii) S.I. No. 236 of 1964, the Local Government

(Planning and Development) Act,

1963,

(Exempted Development) Regulations, 1964,

prescribing classes of development which in

addition to those specified in'section 4 of the

Act are exempted development and which

may

be

carried

out without Planning

Permission.

The above are available from the Government

Stationery Office, G.P.O. Arcade, Dublin i.

MISCONDUCT IN MISLEADING A

COLLEAGUE

The Divisional Court (Lord Chief Justice, Mr.

Justice Cassels and Ashworth, J.) dismissed an

appeal by a solicitor from the findings and order of

the Disciplinary Committee of the Law Society

whereby he was ordered to be suspended from

practice for one year. The committee found that the

solicitor had been guilty of breaches of the Solicitors'

Accounts Rules, and that he had been guilty of

conduct unbefitting a solicitor in misapplying mqney

held and received by him on behalf of clients. The

committee also found that the solicitor had been

guilty of conduct unbefitting a solicitor in making

a false statement to another solicitor in relation to a

professional matter in which he had a personal

financial interest and in utilizing funds of whichhe

was a trustee to make payments to himself and to a

co-trustee when he knew that the entitlement to

these payments was challenged.

The Lord Chief Justice in his judgment stated

(inter alia)—

With regard to the breaches of

the

Accounts Rules it was right to say that there

w.as

no possible element of dishonesty, that no c

lient

had lost a penny, that the deficiency had been

extinguished as soon as it was discovered, and that

there was always cash in the bank to cover it. None

theless, this Court had held and stated many times

that a breach of the Rules was a serious-matter and

if it were allowed to go on, public confidence in the

profession would be shaken. It was necessary to

take a very serious view of it, even where there had

been no moral turpitude.

(The Times, 4th February,

1960.)

STIPULATION AS TO COSTS

Members are referred to Opinion DR. 24 appearing

at page 238 of the

Members' Handbook

which states :

" The Council disapprove of a stipulation in a

contract for sale making the purchaser liable for

the vendor's costs whether the sale is effected by

way of conveyance or lease or by public auction

or private treaty in as much as it tends to suggest

to the purchaser to retain the vendor's solicitor."

In a recent case member stated that he acted for

a client who agreed to take a plot of ground for the

purpose of erecting a house thereon. The solicitor

acting for the lessor also acts for the builder and has

furnished member with a building contract which

contains a clause that the employer (i.e., member's

client) should be responsible for

the builder's

solicitor's costs of the building contract. The clause

in the building contract read :

" The employer shall be liable for all legal costs

and expenses incurred by the builder in connection

with this contract and matters incidental thereto

including

the costs of grant applications

in

addition to the contract price herein stated."

The Council are of opinion that such a stipulation

is analogous to that contained in the previous

Opinion and accordingly Opinion DR. 24 is hereby

extended to include a building contract.

The

Council disapprove of any stipulation which imposes

on the purchaser the builder's cost of the building

contract.

INTERNATIONAL LAW

The Republic of Ireland (Consequential Adaptation

of Enactment) Order, 1964 (No. 1200) (3d.), made

under the Irish Free State (Consequential Provisions)

Act, 1922 (13 Geo. 5, Sess. 2, c. 2), s. 6 ; came into

operation on August i, 1964.

It enables warrants

issued in the Republic to be endorsed and executed

in Great Britain, the Channel Islands and Isle of

Man if transmitted to, and endorsed by, certain

specified Irish police officers.

LAND PURCHASE ACTS RULES, 1964

Members please note that the above rules issued

by the Irish Land Commission (S.I. No. 230 of 1964)

can be purchased from the Government Publications

Sales Office, G.P.O. Arcade, Dublin i, or from any

bookseller, price 2/6d. The rules are operative as

and from ist October, 1964. The rules amend the

provisional rules under the Land Purchase Act dated

jth February, 1924, with the object of simplifying

the existing procedure for obtaining allocation of

purchase moneys and other funds to credit in the

Land Commission. The rules also prescribe revised

scales for legal costs in such cases.

CASES OF THE MONTH

Transcript of evidence

To meet the urgent need of a would-be appellant

to have a transcript of the judgement against him in

order to consider whether to appeal, the original

transcript of the shorthand writer was submitted to

4J