Previous Page  54 / 364 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 54 / 364 Next Page
Page Background

James W. O'Donovan, 448 ;

John Maher, 445 ;

William J. V. Comerford, 443 ;

Thomas V.

O'Connor, 427 ; Thomas H. Bacon, 407 ; George G.

Overend, 403 ; Brendan A. McGrath, 401 ; William

A. Tormey, 400; Desmond Moran, 384; Peter

D. M. Prentice, 374; James R. C. Green, 354;

Raymond A. French, 331 ; Gerald Y. Goldberg,

316.

The scrutineers returned the foregoing thirty-one

members as duly elected ordinary members of the

Council for the year 1964-65.

The following candidates also received the number

of votes placed after their names :

Edward J. C. Dillon, 308 ; Charles Hyland, 296;

Brendan T. Walsh, 254 ; Samuel V. Crawford, 253 ;

Robert W. R. Johnston, 250.

The audited accounts and balance sheets for the

year ended 30th April, 1964, circulated with the

agenda, were adopted. Messrs. Kevans & Sons were

re-appointed as the Society's auditors.

The President, moving the adoption of the report

of the Council for the year 1963-64, said :

Ladies and Gentlemen : Before my report for the

year I have first to record with deep regret the deaths

of the members of our Society which occurred

since our last ordinary meeting. James Fagan, died

25th July, 1964, late of 57/58 Parnell Square, Dublin.

Andrew J. O'Flynn, died i st July, 1964, late of 4 Cecil

Street, Limerick. Mr. Edward B. Williams, died

I4th July, 1964,

late of Castlebar, Co. Mayo.

Mr. Patrick McDowell, County Registrar

for

Wicklow, died i7th August, 1964. Mr. John C.

Callan, died nth September, 1964, late of Kings-

court, Co. Cavan. Mr. David H. Charles, died

15th September, 1964, late of 4 Clare Street, Dublin.

Mr. Seamus O'Connor, died ist October, 1964, late

of 30 Bachelor's Walk, Dublin.

May I, on my own behalf, and on behalf of my

fellow council members, express to their relatives

and friends our sincere sympathy.

Finance

The Accounts and Balance Sheet of the Society have been

circulated to you and they set out very clearly our financial

position. Expenditure is still rising and our annual profit

continues to decrease.

The Finance Committee meets regularly each month and

investigates fully all items of expenditure and revenue and

does everything possible to ensure that revenue is maintained

and expenditure kept in check. Outgoings, however, continue

to rise and in spite of representations made by a number of

my predecessors our Society is still bound to make an annual

contribution of £530 to the Incorporated Society of Law

Reporting. This is a public service which should be financed

out of public funds and I look forward to the day when this

will be realised and accepted and when we will be relieved of

the responsibility of making this annual contribution.

Law Calendar and Directory

The second part of the

Laiv Calendar and Directory

namely,

" The Directory", has now been amended as a result of

suggestions made by several members of the profession. We

would welcome your views in due course as to whether the

Directory

is now sufficiently complete and meets with general

approval.

Bar Associations

I renew the appeal which I made to every solicitor, especially

newly qualified solicitors, when I spoke to you last May. Bar

associations are still and will always be necessary and vital if

unity in our profession is going to continue.

In the year which is now ending I have visited a number of

towns in Ireland where there were extremely flourishing bar

associations and on the introduction of the Succession Bill

almost all bar associations over the country provided inspired

and intelligent criticisms which were a great help to the Council

when they had to consider and suggest amendments to be

made to that Bill. I would like to thank all these associations

for the work they have done and for the interest they have

shown and in particular I would like to thank them for having

sent so many representatives to the special meeting of the

Council which was held recently in connection with the

Succession Bill.

During the month of October I spent five days at Folkestone

as a guest of the Law Society of England and Wales at their

conference and while there I learned that the local bar associa

tions in England are becoming more and more important

each year and their growth is encouraged and viewed with

pleasure by the councils there.

Similarly we will always

continue to encourage united bar associations and would like

to see one in every county in Ireland.

Legal Education and Training

In the month of July, 1961, your Council prepared a

memorandum on legal education and training and when later

on the Commission on Higher Education was established the

Council forwarded a copy of their memorandum to that

Commission for consideration.

In the month of May of this year, representatives of your

Council were invited to attend before the Commission on

Higher Education to amplify and discuss some of the matters

mentioned in the memorandum. Reference had been made to

certain defects in the then educational system on the grounds

that it was too rigid and could not be adapted to suit changing

circumstances ;

this was because of the fact that the system

was established by Statutory Enactment and could not be

changed except by legislation. The five year term ofapprentice

ship and some of the other Statutory requirements had been

handed down for hundreds of years and the Council took the

view that power should be given to the Society to prescribe

the whole system of legal education and training for the

profession exercisable by Statutory regulations subject to

the aoproval of the President of the High Court.

We had also stated that the system of apprenticeship was

unsatisfactory as the course was far too crowded to permit

an apprentice to acquire any real acquaintance with the practical

aspects of a solicitor's work and that it should be possible for

the apprentice to spend more time in the office with his master.

The memorandum had also stated that the Council was not

satisfied with the quality of instruction in some of the

university law schools and drew attention to the fact that

there was not one whole time lecturer in the law faculty.

The Council made five main recommendations and submitted

six other matters which they considered were specific require

ments of the solicitors' profession.

A deputation made up of Mr. James Greene, Mr. Peter