Previous Page  70 / 364 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 70 / 364 Next Page
Page Background

production was injurious to public interest. The

validity of the Statutory Instrument to which the

doctrine of

ultra vires

was applicable was also raised.

JThe court HELD that:

1. Crown privilege, being a matter of substantive

law and not mere practice or procedure, R.S.C.

Ord. 24, r. 15,* in so far as it purported to alter

(not merely to state) the existing law was

ultra

vires.

2. In order that Crown privilege should be success

fully asserted, the objection must be sufficient in law

and must be taken in proper form, that was, in the

ordinary way by the Minister himself, on oath, if

need be, after considering the documents himself.

Lord Denning stated that if it is not taken in proper

form, the court can overrule the objection and order

production; but before doing so, it will, as a rule,

inspect the documents itself in order to determine

whether in point of substance their production would

be injurious to the public interest.

3. That the objection of a Minister to the pro

duction of a class of documents was not conclusive

and if the court was of the opinion that it was not

taken in good faith or that there were no reasonable

grounds for the claim of privilege it would override

the objection and order production, but that residual

power of the court would only be exercised in

exceptional and rare cases.

4. That where a Minister was objecting to all

documents in a particular class even though none of

them contained any information which, if revealed,

would injure the public interest, he should describe

the nature of the class and the reason why the

documents should not be disclosed.

5. That, although the further affidavit of the

Minister was ambiguous and incomplete, on balance,

the interests of justice did not require the production

of the documents and that accordingly the Minister's

objection to their production should be upheld and

the appeal dismissed.

(In re Grosvenor Hotel, London (No. 2) [1964]

3 IF.L.R., pp. 992-1029.)

*There is as yet no corresponding rule in this

country, as this principle has

been incorporated

for the first time in the English R.S.C. 1964.

FACSIMILE PROBATE ENGROSSMENTS

The Probate Office will accept engrossments of

wills made by the Society's document copying service

where the original is in typescript or legible manu

script. Points to be noted :

I. Copies will be made on paper supplied by the

Society, dimensions i5"xio" or

I3"x8" as

appropriate.

2. The engrossment lodged in the Probate Office

should be accompanied by an extra paper

backing sheet which will be stapled into the

grant.

3. The usual certificate that the engrossment is a

true copy by the solicitor should either be

appended or typed on a separate sheet.

OBITUARY

MRS. MAUREEN A. GALLEN, Solicitor, died on the

2nd December, 1964, at the Bon Secours Hospital,

Dublin.

Mrs. Gallen served her apprenticeship with the late

Mr. John Hawthorne, 15 Eustace Street, Dublin,

was admitted in Easter Sittings, 1934, and practised

at 15 Eustace Street, Dublin under the style of

Messrs. John Hawthorne & Co.

REGISTRATION OF TITLE ACTS,

1891 AND 1942

Issue of new Land Certificate

Applications have been received from the registered

owners mentioned in the Schedule annexed hereto,

for the issue of Certificates of Title in substitution for

the original Certificates issued in respect of the lands

specified

in

the said Schedule, which original

Certificates, it is alleged, have been lost or in

advertently destroyed.

A new Certificate will be issued in each case,

except a case in respect of which notification is

received in this Registry within 28 days from the

publication of this notice, that the Certificate of Title

is still in existence, and in the custody of some person

other than the registered owner. Any such notification

should state the grounds on which such Certificate is

being held.

Dated the yth day of January, 1965.

D. L. McALLISTER,

Registrar of Titles.

Central Office,

Land Registry,

Chancery Street,

DUBLIN.

SCHEDULE

1. Registered Limited Owner, MaryAnne Kiernan.

Folio number 4017. County Longford. Lands of

Monaduff in the Barony of Longford containing

323. 2r. lop.

2. Registered Owner, Richard Recks (Junior).

Folio number 8397. County Kings. Lands of Erry

66