Background Image
Previous Page  83 / 112 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 83 / 112 Next Page
Page Background

Global Marketplace

www.read-tpt.com

November

2012

81

Oil and gas

An early judgment on the effect

of the EU embargo on Iran’s oil

shipments: a not unqualified

success

“The six-month run-up to the implementation of a full

European Union embargo on Iranian crude left many market

watchers complacent about the impact sanctions would have

on consumers in Europe.”

Writing in the

Wall Street Journal

about six weeks into the EU

embargo, Sarah Kent observed that, by 1 July, most European

refiners had already replaced Iranian oil with crude from

countries like Saudi Arabia, Russia and Iraq. Oil prices were

close to their lowest level since May. And yet, she noted, a

significant dent to one Italian refiner’s profits in the second

quarter suggested that – although European refiners had

kept the oil flowing – the cost of sanctions “could still prove

problematic.” (“Iran Oil Embargo Has Ripple Effect for Europe,”

10 August)

Saras, one of Italy’s biggest private oil refiners, announced a

net loss of $162mn despite a sharp drop in oil prices over the

period. While other factors played a part in the disappointing

results, it was fairly evident that the loss of Iranian crude was

exacerbating an already difficult situation.

According to the Paris-based International Energy Agency

(IEA), Mediterranean refineries arguably have been hit hardest

by the sanctions. They have access to few immediately

available substitutes to Iranian crude; and the price of the

default alternative – Russian Urals crude – shot up after the

full EU embargo was implemented.

DavidWech, head of research at JBCEnergy in Vienna, pointed

out that soaring prices for crude grades of a similar quality to

Iranian oil had diminished the benefit that refineries could reap

from the fall in the benchmark price in the first quarter. He told

the

Journal

, “Let’s say the Iran story has deepened the crude

imbalance that is there anyway in a market where there is too

much light, sweet stuff and not enough sour barrels.”

Indeed, Ms Kent noted, speculation on the effects of the

sanctions against Iran – with Iranian oil simply redirected

en masse to willing Asian buyers, freeing up other oil grades

to flow back to Europe – might have been overly optimistic.

But the data are open to interpretation. According to the IEA,

exports of Iranian crude plummeted by nearly 750,000 barrels

per day (bpd) in July to 1 million bpd. To David Fyfe, head of

the IEA oil markets division, if anything the sanctions looked

to be being even more successful than the EU and US were

planning. Still, wrote Ms Kent, “Many believe that July and

August would be the toughest months for Iranian exports, and

that they could bounce back slightly in the autumn as Asian

buyers find ways to navigate the sanctions.”

JBC’s Mr Wech inclined to that view. “Without question Iran

had big problems to sell its crude in July,” he told Ms Kent in

mid-August. “But we think that that will improve from now on.”

With Iran’s oil inventory growing because of the Western

embargoes, the

Tehran Times

on 15 September carried a

report from the Mehr News Agency of a large sale of Iranian

oil through private companies. Hassan Khosrojerdi, head of

the oil products exporters’ union, was quoted as saying that a

private consortium had signed two agreements to sell about

four million barrels of Iranian crude “to be delivered in the

[Persian] Gulf to foreign buyers”.

Up to that point, the National Iranian Oil Co (NIOC) was

solely responsible for exporting the Islamic Republic’s crude.

The news agency took note of the official’s complaint that

the Central Bank of Iran, the country’s main conduit for oil

revenues, had been slow to devise and approve a financial

mechanism for the sale of oil by private companies. Without

that, Mr Khosrojerdi said, the private sector “cannot take any

serious action to export oil”.

The Central Bank of Iran is under sanction by the US. Entities

that do business with it may be frozen out of US financial

markets.

Elsewhere in oil and gas . . .

Saudi Steel Pipe Co (SSP) has received contracts worth

$57mn to supply Saudi Arabian Oil Co with steel pipes for

lining oil wells and gas pipelines. As reported by

Zawya Dow

Jones Newswires

(26 August), the pipe maker told the Saudi

bourse website that the Aramco order would be fulfilled by the

first quarter of 2013. SSP, which manufactures black and hot-

dip galvanised welded steel pipe at its headquarters factory in

Dammam, will utilise raw materials supplied by Saudi Basic

Industries Corp, or Sabic. In July, SSP reported that higher

raw material prices were weighing on its profit margins.

On 2 August, a 2" plastic gas pipe ruptured in the same

San Francisco suburb of San Bruno where a pipeline

explosion killed eight people in 2010. A spokesman for Pacific

Gas & Electric Co told the Associated Press that the line

burst when someone dug into the pipe near the site of the

previous blast; a fire dispatcher said there were no injuries.

The explosion on 9 September, 2010, of a high-pressure

transmission line sparked a gas-fueled fire that destroyed 38

homes and laid waste to parts of the same neighbourhood.

Dorothy Fabian, Features Editor (USA)

Iran has been under

embargo from the US