Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  162 / 620 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 162 / 620 Next Page
Page Background

Page

10

of

14

Table 2-3

CF’s

Commodity type

CF

1

scFOS and oligofructose (DP= 3.60-4)

1.233

2 H.S.I., Synergy 1 and native inulin (DP = 5.49-10)

1.068

3

Enriched Inulin (Avg. DP= 11-50)

0.9526

Validation Protocol

1.

Linearity –

A total of 43 standard curves were collected. Linearity Data analyzed in Microsoft Excel.

2.

Accuracy –

Triplicate analyses of spiked samples on each of three days. Data analyzed in Microsoft Excel.

a.

Additional testing on SPIFAN matrices is intended, but not yet completed.

3.

Precision –

Duplicate analyses of products on each of 10 days Calculated run-to-run %RSD, within-run %RSD, and total

(intermediate) %RSD in 2 separate labs. Additionally, collected a total of 37 additional analyses of Abbott internal control in a

total of 3 labs. Data analyzed in Microsoft Excel and Minitab.

a.

Performed 4 days of duplicate testing on SPIFAN matrices. Additional data to be acquired.

4.

Specificity –

Specificity was demonstrated by analysis of spiked samples containing GOS (known amount of fructan spiked in).

Additionally checked for other chromatographic interferences by analysis of multiple maltodextrin commodities.

5.

MDL/LOQ –

The LOQ was empirically demonstrated by analysis of a low level spike solution.

Results and Discussion

Method Development

The method described here is based on methods that were previously published. The principle differences are summarized in Table 2-4 below.

FOS-04

FOR ERP USE ONLY

DO NOT DISTRIBUTE