Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  580 / 1119 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 580 / 1119 Next Page
Page Background

Dosimetric Comparison: 3D Conformal vs IMRT

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

bowel 30 Gy

bowel 42.75 Gy

volume in cc

conformal

imrt

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

bladder 30 Gy

bladder 42.75 Gy

conformal

imrt

0

20

40

60

80

100

rectum 30 Gy

rectum 42.72 Gy

conformal

imrt

Van de Bunt et al 2006

Volume of OAR ( Bowel , Bladder , Rectum ) receiving higher doses

were significantly less in IMRT than 3D-CRT plan