1.Introduction Toronto 2016 KT_RP_full resolution.pdf |
1 |
WELCOMEESTRO-CARO Teaching CourseImage-guided cervix radiotherapy – with a special focus on adaptive brachytherapyToronto 4.-6. April 2016 |
1 |
Image-guided cervix radiotherapy – with a special focus on adaptive brachytherapy |
2 |
Faculty |
3 |
Slide Number 4 |
4 |
Slide Number 5 |
5 |
Advanced image guided EBRT |
6 |
Contents of the course |
7 |
RetroEMBRACE |
8 |
EMBRACE study |
9 |
Slide Number 10 |
10 |
Who are you? |
11 |
How is external beam pelvic radiotherapy typically delivered? |
12 |
How do you perform image guidance for EBRT? |
13 |
How is cervical cancer brachytherapy typically prescribed at your institution? |
14 |
How often do you use a combined intracavitary-interstitial applicator for cervix cancer brachytherapy? |
15 |
What imaging do you perform after applicator insertion? |
16 |
Support by industry |
17 |
Organisation |
18 |
2.Anatomic consideration in cervical cancer, T. May 2016 |
19 |
Anatomical considerations, clinical examination, and staging |
19 |
Disclosure |
20 |
Objectives |
21 |
Slide Number 4 |
22 |
Slide Number 5 |
23 |
Slide Number 6 |
24 |
Slide Number 7 |
25 |
Slide Number 8 |
26 |
Surgical treatment options |
27 |
Hysterectomy |
28 |
Slide Number 11 |
29 |
Slide Number 12 |
30 |
Slide Number 13 |
31 |
Slide Number 14 |
32 |
Retroperitoneal Lymphadenectomy |
33 |
Pelvic Lymphadenectomy |
34 |
Minimally Invasive Surgery vs. Laparotomy |
35 |
Introduction to MIS |
36 |
Laparoscopy vs. Robotic |
37 |
Canadian Gyn Oncology Experience |
38 |
Slide Number 21 |
39 |
Slide Number 22 |
40 |
Slide Number 23 |
41 |
Advances in the surgical management of cervical cancer |
42 |
Radical Robotic Trachelectomy |
43 |
Radical Trachelectomy |
44 |
Trachelectomy |
45 |
Slide Number 28 |
46 |
Slide Number 29 |
47 |
Slide Number 30 |
48 |
Slide Number 31 |
49 |
Slide Number 32 |
50 |
Slide Number 33 |
51 |
Slide Number 34 |
52 |
Slide Number 35 |
53 |
Radical Trachelectomy Outcomes |
54 |
Radical Trachelectomy Obstetrical Outcomes |
55 |
Embryonal Rhabdomyosarcoma |
56 |
Ovarian Transposition |
57 |
Slide Number 40 |
58 |
Slide Number 41 |
59 |
Fusion of Technology |
60 |
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy |
61 |
SLNB - Multiple Advantages |
62 |
Techniques for SLN Biopsy |
63 |
Slide Number 46 |
64 |
Slide Number 47 |
65 |
Slide Number 48 |
66 |
Pushing the envelope of MIS |
67 |
Slide Number 50 |
68 |
3.MRI OF CA CX |
69 |
Slide Number 1 |
69 |
Slide Number 2 |
70 |
INDICATION |
71 |
MRI PROTOCOL |
72 |
MRI PROTOCOL |
73 |
MRI PROTOCOL |
74 |
Slide Number 7 |
75 |
HI RES OBLIQUE T2 |
76 |
DWI |
77 |
Normal Anatomy |
78 |
Slide Number 11 |
79 |
Slide Number 12 |
80 |
Pelvic Lymph Nodes: Anatomy |
81 |
Slide Number 14 |
82 |
Slide Number 15 |
83 |
Slide Number 16 |
84 |
Slide Number 17 |
85 |
Slide Number 18 |
86 |
Histology |
87 |
Cervical Cancer : MRI |
88 |
FIGO Staging: Clinical |
89 |
KEY ISSUES FOR TREATMENT |
90 |
MRI Impact |
91 |
TUMOUR SIZE |
92 |
Internal Os |
93 |
IB-Cervix Stroma |
94 |
MRI Impact |
95 |
IIB- Parametrial Invasion?“To Be or Not To Be” |
96 |
IIB-Parametrial Spread |
97 |
IIIA -LOWER 1/3 VAGINA |
98 |
IIIB-Ureter |
99 |
IIIB- Pelvic side wall |
100 |
IVA-Bladder Invasion |
101 |
LYMPHADENOPATHY |
102 |
LYMPHADENOPATHY |
103 |
LYMPHADENOPATHY |
104 |
DWI- PELVIC NODES |
105 |
PET-MRI |
106 |
POST TREATMENT MRI |
107 |
Post Treatment Evaluation |
108 |
Slide Number 41 |
109 |
FISTULA |
110 |
RECURRENT DISEASE |
111 |
SUMMARY |
112 |
Slide Number 45 |
113 |
ADENOMA MALIGNUM |
114 |
Slide Number 47 |
115 |
STRUCTURES THAT CAN MIMIC A LYMPH NODE ON IMAGING |
116 |
MRI Protocol: Pearls |
117 |
4.Radiologic pathology at BT_Cervical cancer_PPetric_Toronto 2016_clean |
118 |
Slide Number 1 |
118 |
Gold standard: T2W MRI |
119 |
Interpretation of imaging findings at BTWhat is the High Risk CTV on this slice? (your best guess) |
120 |
Interpretation of imaging findings at BT |
121 |
Interpretation of imaging findings at BT |
122 |
Slide Number 6 |
123 |
Slide Number 7 |
124 |
STEPS of Assessment of MRI at BT |
125 |
1. Rule out FLOP |
126 |
Entrer le texte de la question |
127 |
1. Rule out FLOP |
128 |
1. Rule out FLOP |
129 |
1. Rule out FLOP |
130 |
Systematic Assessment of MRI at BT |
131 |
Systematic Assessment of MRI at BT |
132 |
Set the STAGE for contouring |
133 |
Set the STAGE for contouring |
134 |
Slide Number 18 |
135 |
Slide Number 19 |
136 |
Slide Number 20 |
137 |
Slide Number 21 |
138 |
Slide Number 22 |
139 |
Slide Number 23 |
140 |
Slide Number 24 |
141 |
Set the STAGE before contouring |
142 |
Slide Number 26 |
143 |
Set the STAGE before contouring |
144 |
Slide Number 28 |
145 |
Set the STAGE before contouring |
146 |
Entrer le texte de la question |
147 |
Slide Number 31 |
148 |
Slide Number 32 |
149 |
Entrer le texte de la question |
150 |
Slide Number 34 |
151 |
Slide Number 35 |
152 |
Set the STAGE before contouring |
153 |
Slide Number 37 |
154 |
Slide Number 38 |
155 |
Slide Number 39 |
156 |
Slide Number 40 |
157 |
Slide Number 41 |
158 |
Slide Number 42 |
159 |
Applicator material, Field strength and Image sequence |
160 |
Choice of imaging modality for IGABT |
161 |
Slide Number 45 |
162 |
5.Combined Intracvitary -Interstitial Techniques Cervical cancer_clean |
163 |
Slide Number 1 |
163 |
Slide Number 2 |
164 |
What brachytherapy technique would you do for this tumor topography after external radiation and chemotherapy? |
165 |
What brachytherapy technique would you do for this tumor topography after external radiation and chemotherapy? |
166 |
Slide Number 5 |
167 |
Slide Number 6 |
168 |
Slide Number 7 |
169 |
Slide Number 8 |
170 |
Slide Number 9 |
171 |
Slide Number 10 |
172 |
Slide Number 11 |
173 |
Slide Number 12 |
174 |
Slide Number 13 |
175 |
Slide Number 14 |
176 |
Slide Number 15 |
177 |
Slide Number 16 |
178 |
Slide Number 17 |
179 |
Slide Number 18 |
180 |
Slide Number 19 |
181 |
Slide Number 20 |
182 |
Slide Number 21 |
183 |
Slide Number 22 |
184 |
Slide Number 23 |
185 |
Slide Number 24 |
186 |
Slide Number 25 |
187 |
Slide Number 26 |
188 |
Slide Number 27 |
189 |
Slide Number 28 |
190 |
Slide Number 29 |
191 |
Slide Number 30 |
192 |
Slide Number 31 |
193 |
Slide Number 32 |
194 |
Slide Number 33 |
195 |
Slide Number 34 |
196 |
Slide Number 35 |
197 |
Slide Number 36 |
198 |
Slide Number 37 |
199 |
Slide Number 38 |
200 |
Slide Number 39 |
201 |
Slide Number 40 |
202 |
Slide Number 41 |
203 |
Slide Number 42 |
204 |
Slide Number 43 |
205 |
Slide Number 44 |
206 |
Slide Number 45 |
207 |
Slide Number 46 |
208 |
Slide Number 47 |
209 |
Slide Number 48 |
210 |
Slide Number 49 |
211 |
Slide Number 50 |
212 |
Slide Number 51 |
213 |
Slide Number 52 |
214 |
Slide Number 53 |
215 |
Slide Number 54 |
216 |
Adaptive BT applicators |
217 |
Slide Number 56 |
218 |
What brachytherapy technique would you do for this tumor topography after external radiation and chemotherapy? |
219 |
What brachytherapy technique would you do for this tumor topography after external radiation and chemotherapy? |
220 |
Slide Number 59 |
221 |
6.Clinical diagrams_Umesh_clean |
222 |
Slide Number 1 |
222 |
Clinical drawings aid in |
223 |
Slide Number 3 |
224 |
Slide Number 4 |
225 |
Slide Number 5 |
226 |
Slide Number 6 |
227 |
Slide Number 7 |
228 |
Slide Number 8 |
229 |
Slide Number 9 |
230 |
Slide Number 11 |
231 |
Slide Number 13 |
232 |
Slide Number 15 |
233 |
Slide Number 21 |
234 |
Slide Number 23 |
235 |
Slide Number 25 |
236 |
Slide Number 27 |
237 |
Slide Number 28 |
238 |
Slide Number 29 |
239 |
Slide Number 35 |
240 |
Slide Number 36 |
241 |
Slide Number 37 |
242 |
SUMMARY |
243 |
Slide Number 39 |
244 |
7.Applicators_IC_BT_Cervix_PPetric_TORONTO_2016_clean |
245 |
Slide Number 1 |
245 |
Slide Number 2 |
246 |
Slide Number 3 |
247 |
Slide Number 4 |
248 |
Slide Number 5 |
249 |
Slide Number 6 |
250 |
Slide Number 7 |
251 |
Slide Number 8 |
252 |
Slide Number 9 |
253 |
Slide Number 10 |
254 |
Slide Number 11 |
255 |
Slide Number 12 |
256 |
Slide Number 13 |
257 |
Slide Number 14 |
258 |
Slide Number 15 |
259 |
Slide Number 16 |
260 |
Slide Number 17 |
261 |
Slide Number 18 |
262 |
Limitations of modern IC applicatorsHow far from point A can we “push” the prescription isodose? |
263 |
Slide Number 20 |
264 |
Slide Number 21 |
265 |
Slide Number 22 |
266 |
Slide Number 23 |
267 |
Overcoming limitations of IC applicatorsHow would you boost this area? |
268 |
Slide Number 25 |
269 |
Slide Number 26 |
270 |
Slide Number 27 |
271 |
Slide Number 28 |
272 |
Slide Number 29 |
273 |
Slide Number 30 |
274 |
Slide Number 31 |
275 |
Slide Number 32 |
276 |
Slide Number 33 |
277 |
Slide Number 34 |
278 |
Slide Number 35 |
279 |
Slide Number 36 |
280 |
Slide Number 37 |
281 |
Slide Number 38 |
282 |
Slide Number 39 |
283 |
Slide Number 40 |
284 |
Slide Number 41 |
285 |
Slide Number 42 |
286 |
8.Gyn GEC ESTRO recommendations_with TP RP_clean |
287 |
Slide Number 1 |
287 |
gynaecologic brachytherapyevolution |
288 |
Slide Number 3 |
289 |
Slide Number 4 |
290 |
Slide Number 5 |
291 |
Slide Number 6 |
292 |
Slide Number 7 |
293 |
Slide Number 8 |
294 |
MRI: Initial tumour extension (3D RT)pattern of response (4D RT) for adaptive MRI based planning |
295 |
Slide Number 10 |
296 |
HR-CTV includes: |
297 |
IR-CTV includes: |
298 |
Slide Number 13 |
299 |
The language challenge I Risk orientated (“High Risk”)adaptive Target concept |
300 |
Slide Number 15 |
301 |
Overview of the adaptive target concept cervix cancer stage IB, IIB, IIIB: HR+IR CTV-T |
302 |
Risk orientated adaptive Target Concept Terms: GTVres, residual pathologic tissue, CTVHR, CTVIR, GTVinit, |
303 |
The challengeof MRI availability |
304 |
Slide Number 19 |
305 |
Slide Number 20 |
306 |
Slide Number 21 |
307 |
Overview of the adaptive target concept cervix cancer stage IB, IIB, IIIB: HR+IR CTV-T |
308 |
Slide Number 23 |
309 |
Slide Number 24 |
310 |
Cervix cancer stage IB1 initial GTV, HR CTV, IR CTV, LR CTV |
311 |
1. Limited disease (tumour size 2cm) |
312 |
1. Limited disease (tumour size 2cm) |
313 |
1. Limited disease (tumour size 2cm) |
314 |
1. Limited disease (tumour size 2cm) |
315 |
1. Limited disease (tumour size 2cm) |
316 |
Slide Number 31 |
317 |
Slide Number 32 |
318 |
Stage IB1 |
319 |
Slide Number 34 |
320 |
Stage IB1 |
321 |
Slide Number 36 |
322 |
Cervix cancer stage IB1 initial and residual GTV, HR CTV, IR CTV, LR CTV |
323 |
Slide Number 38 |
324 |
Slide Number 39 |
325 |
Slide Number 40 |
326 |
Slide Number 41 |
327 |
Slide Number 42 |
328 |
Slide Number 43 |
329 |
Slide Number 44 |
330 |
Slide Number 45 |
331 |
HR-CTV includes: |
332 |
IR-CTV includes: |
333 |
Slide Number 48 |
334 |
Cervix cancer stage IB2 initial and residual GTV, HR CTV, IR CTV, LR CTV |
335 |
Slide Number 50 |
336 |
Slide Number 51 |
337 |
Slide Number 52 |
338 |
Slide Number 53 |
339 |
Slide Number 54 |
340 |
Slide Number 55 |
341 |
Slide Number 56 |
342 |
Slide Number 57 |
343 |
Slide Number 58 |
344 |
HR-CTV includes: |
345 |
IR-CTV includes: |
346 |
Slide Number 61 |
347 |
Slide Number 62 |
348 |
Slide Number 63 |
349 |
Slide Number 64 |
350 |
Slide Number 65 |
351 |
Slide Number 66 |
352 |
Slide Number 67 |
353 |
Slide Number 68 |
354 |
Slide Number 69 |
355 |
Slide Number 70 |
356 |
Slide Number 71 |
357 |
Slide Number 72 |
358 |
Cervix cancer stage IIB, |
359 |
Slide Number 74 |
360 |
Slide Number 75 |
361 |
Slide Number 76 |
362 |
Slide Number 77 |
363 |
Slide Number 78 |
364 |
Slide Number 79 |
365 |
Slide Number 80 |
366 |
Slide Number 81 |
367 |
Slide Number 82 |
368 |
Slide Number 83 |
369 |
Slide Number 84 |
370 |
Slide Number 85 |
371 |
Slide Number 86 |
372 |
Slide Number 87 |
373 |
Slide Number 88 |
374 |
Slide Number 89 |
375 |
Slide Number 90 |
376 |
Overview of the adaptive target concept cervix cancer stage IB, IIB, IIIB: HR+IR CTV-T |
377 |
Slide Number 92 |
378 |
Slide Number 93 |
379 |
Slide Number 94 |
380 |
Slide Number 95 |
381 |
Slide Number 96 |
382 |
Slide Number 97 |
383 |
Slide Number 98 |
384 |
Slide Number 99 |
385 |
Slide Number 100 |
386 |
Slide Number 101 |
387 |
Slide Number 102 |
388 |
Overview of the adaptive target concept cervix cancer stage IB, IIB, IIIB: HR+IR CTV-T |
389 |
Risk orientated adaptive Target Concept Terms: GTVres, residual pathologic tissue, CTVHR, CTVIR, GTVinit, |
390 |
HR-CTV includes: |
391 |
IR-CTV includes: |
392 |
ICRU 88 Prescribing, Recording, and ReportingBrachytherapy (BT) for Cancer of the Cervix |
393 |
Slide Number 108 |
394 |
Slide Number 109 |
395 |
Slide Number 110 |
396 |
9.Berger_Applicator_Reconstruction_Toronto 2016 TurningPoint_clean |
397 |
Slide Number 1 |
397 |
Presentation overview |
398 |
Slide Number 3 |
399 |
Slide Number 4 |
400 |
Slide Number 5 |
401 |
Slide Number 6 |
402 |
Slide Number 7 |
403 |
Defining the source pathin relation to the patients anatomy |
404 |
Localization techniques in “2D” and 3D |
405 |
Sectional Imaging CT / MRI |
406 |
Presentation overview |
407 |
Direct Visualizing the Source Path |
408 |
Slide Number 15 |
409 |
Direct-reconstruction on sectional images |
410 |
Slide Number 17 |
411 |
Orientation of applicator/image plane |
412 |
Direct reconstruction - challenge |
413 |
Slide Number 20 |
414 |
3D (SPACE) T2 weighted MR imaging |
415 |
Slide Number 23 |
416 |
Where to start the reconstruction of the ring |
417 |
Slide Number 25 |
418 |
Quality Check of the reconstruction process |
419 |
Presentation overview |
420 |
In-Direct Visualizing the Source Path |
421 |
Slide Number 29 |
422 |
Slide Number 30 |
423 |
Slide Number 31 |
424 |
Slide Number 32 |
425 |
Slide Number 33 |
426 |
Slide Number 34 |
427 |
Slide Number 35 |
428 |
Predefined applicator geometry - library |
429 |
Presentation overview |
430 |
Commissioning of Applicators |
431 |
Applicator material! |
432 |
Indexer Length and Off-set |
433 |
Off-set will effect the insertion depth |
434 |
Visibility !!! |
435 |
Auto-radiography to verify the reconstruction of the source path in the TPS (or pre-defined Applicator Library) |
436 |
Verify the source path using Auto-radiography |
437 |
Slide Number 48 |
438 |
Quality Control in applicator reconstruction |
439 |
Presentation overview |
440 |
Slide Number 51 |
441 |
Slide Number 52 |
442 |
Slide Number 53 |
443 |
Slide Number 54 |
444 |
Slide Number 55 |
445 |
10.TATA_2_Large tumour, Good Response_AD_final |
446 |
Slide Number 1 |
446 |
Slide Number 2 |
447 |
Slide Number 3 |
448 |
Slide Number 4 |
449 |
Slide Number 5 |
450 |
Slide Number 6 |
451 |
Slide Number 7 |
452 |
Slide Number 8 |
453 |
Slide Number 9 |
454 |
Slide Number 10 |
455 |
Slide Number 11 |
456 |
Slide Number 12 |
457 |
Slide Number 13 |
458 |
Slide Number 14 |
459 |
Slide Number 15 |
460 |
Slide Number 16 |
461 |
Slide Number 17 |
462 |
11.VIE002 Large GoodMS |
463 |
Slide Number 1 |
463 |
Slide Number 2 |
464 |
Slide Number 3 |
465 |
Slide Number 4 |
466 |
Slide Number 5 |
467 |
Slide Number 6 |
468 |
Slide Number 7 |
469 |
Slide Number 8 |
470 |
Slide Number 9 |
471 |
Slide Number 10 |
472 |
Slide Number 11 |
473 |
Slide Number 12 |
474 |
Slide Number 13 |
475 |
Slide Number 14 |
476 |
Slide Number 15 |
477 |
12.CTV-ITV & OAR at EBRT IS_PP_2015 met TP questionsRP_clean |
478 |
Slide Number 1 |
478 |
Slide Number 2 |
479 |
The CTV of the primary tumor always includes ? |
480 |
Slide Number 4 |
481 |
Slide Number 5 |
482 |
Slide Number 6 |
483 |
Slide Number 7 |
484 |
Slide Number 8 |
485 |
Slide Number 9 |
486 |
Slide Number 10 |
487 |
Slide Number 11 |
488 |
Slide Number 12 |
489 |
Future LR-CTV-Tinitial and CTV-E |
490 |
Slide Number 14 |
491 |
Slide Number 15 |
492 |
Slide Number 16 |
493 |
Slide Number 17 |
494 |
Slide Number 18 |
495 |
The initial LR CTV-T of the primary tumor always includes ? |
496 |
EMBRACE II: CTV-T: initial GTV, HR CTV, LR CTV: Stage IB1 |
497 |
EMBRACE II: CTV-T: initial GTV, HR CTV, LR CTV: Stage IB2 |
498 |
EMBRACE II: CTV-T: initial GTV, HR CTV, LR CTV: stage IIB |
499 |
EMBRACE II: CTV-T: initial GTV, HR CTV, LR CTV: stage IIIB |
500 |
EMBRACE II: CTV-T: initial GTV, HR CTV, LR CTV: stage IVA |
501 |
Slide Number 25 |
502 |
The margin needed to include 99% of detectable lymph nodes is? |
503 |
Slide Number 27 |
504 |
Slide Number 28 |
505 |
Slide Number 29 |
506 |
Slide Number 30 |
507 |
Slide Number 31 |
508 |
Slide Number 32 |
509 |
Slide Number 33 |
510 |
Slide Number 34 |
511 |
Slide Number 35 |
512 |
Slide Number 36 |
513 |
Slide Number 37 |
514 |
Slide Number 38 |
515 |
Slide Number 39 |
516 |
Slide Number 40 |
517 |
Slide Number 41 |
518 |
Slide Number 42 |
519 |
Slide Number 43 |
520 |
Slide Number 44 |
521 |
Slide Number 45 |
522 |
Slide Number 46 |
523 |
Slide Number 47 |
524 |
Slide Number 48 |
525 |
Slide Number 49 |
526 |
Slide Number 50 |
527 |
Slide Number 51 |
528 |
Slide Number 52 |
529 |
Slide Number 53 |
530 |
The margin needed to include 99% of detectable lymph nodes is? |
531 |
Slide Number 55 |
532 |
Slide Number 56 |
533 |
Slide Number 57 |
534 |
Slide Number 58 |
535 |
Slide Number 59 |
536 |
Slide Number 60 |
537 |
Slide Number 61 |
538 |
Slide Number 62 |
539 |
13. KT_image guidance and PTV_Toronto_final_clean |
540 |
Image guidance, organ motion and ITV/PTV ESTRO Teaching CourseImage-Guided Cervix Radiotherapy – with a special focus on adaptive brachytherapyToronto 2016 |
540 |
ITV and PTV |
541 |
Margins in cervix cancer |
542 |
PTV elective target volume |
543 |
IGRT methods |
544 |
Skin marks versus daily bony registration |
545 |
Which PTV margin do you apply for CTV-E? |
546 |
Do you think it is worthwhile to implement daily IGRT and decrease margin from 10mm to 5mm? |
547 |
Why does the margin matter? |
548 |
Let’s take a look at the orange and the peel… |
549 |
Is it important? |
550 |
Is it risky to reduce margins?What is the dosimetric impact of margin reduction? |
551 |
Very first results on dose accumulation for elective target: 1 patient |
552 |
Where are the nodal failures?EMBRACE analysis |
553 |
Thinking Gray and grey... |
554 |
Current (EMBRACE I) and future (EMBRACE II) practice: EBRT volume |
555 |
Simultaneously integrated lymph node boost (SIB) |
556 |
Which PTV margin do you think is necessary for the pathological CTV-N? |
557 |
Margins for pathological lymph node boosting |
558 |
Margins for pathological lymph node boosting |
559 |
Target and organ doses |
560 |
Coverage probability planning recommended in EMBRACE II |
561 |
Which total margin (ITV+PTV) is appropriate for the mobile primary tumour related CTV (GTV+cervix+uterus)? |
562 |
Motion and dose – primary target |
563 |
Which total dose (EBRT+BT) do you think this patient received to the non-involved uterus? |
564 |
Which total dose (EBRT+BT) do you think this patient received to the non-involved uterus? |
565 |
Which total dose is appropriate for controlling the non-involved uterus (EBRT+BT)? |
566 |
Accumulated doses |
567 |
Thinking Gray and grey... |
568 |
Which of these motion patterns are of most concern? |
569 |
ITV-T LR recommended in EMBRACE IIExample: Full rectum |
570 |
ITV-T LR recommended in EMBRACE IIExample: Empty rectum + variable bladder |
571 |
Bladder filling strategy in your department? |
572 |
Slide Number 34 |
573 |
Adaptive EBRT to further shrink margins/improve safety? |
574 |
What has most impact on bowel dose? |
575 |
Take home message: nodal CTV |
576 |
Take home message: primary CTV |
577 |
14.EBRT_medical aspects_Umesh_clean |
578 |
Slide Number 1 |
578 |
Outline |
579 |
Slide Number 3 |
580 |
Dosimetric meta-analysis |
581 |
Dosimetric meta-analysisSummary |
582 |
Conformal to IMRT: GYN Cancers |
583 |
Slide Number 7 |
584 |
What percentage of cervical cancer patients with intact uterus undergo IMRT/VMAT treatment at your centre? |
585 |
Slide Number 9 |
586 |
Slide Number 10 |
587 |
Slide Number 11 |
588 |
Slide Number 12 |
589 |
Slide Number 13 |
590 |
Slide Number 14 |
591 |
Slide Number 15 |
592 |
Slide Number 16 |
593 |
Slide Number 17 |
594 |
Slide Number 18 |
595 |
IMPLEMENTATION OF IGRT IN AN IMRT ENVIRONMENT : PRE-REQUISTE TO SUCCESS |
596 |
Slide Number 20 |
597 |
Slide Number 21 |
598 |
Slide Number 22 |
599 |
RTOG 0418 A phase II study of post op IMRT in gynecological cancer |
600 |
Slide Number 24 |
601 |
Slide Number 25 |
602 |
OAR Contouring & Dose Constraints |
603 |
Slide Number 27 |
604 |
Slide Number 28 |
605 |
BOWEL (acute toxicity): dose-volume effect |
606 |
Slide Number 31 |
607 |
|
608 |
Slide Number 33 |
609 |
Slide Number 34 |
610 |
Prophylactic PA-IMRT |
611 |
Duodenal toxicity in Extended field RT |
612 |
Dose volume relationship for Gross nodes |
613 |
Slide Number 38 |
614 |
PET- CT Based IMRT |
615 |
Slide Number 40 |
616 |
Slide Number 41 |
617 |
Slide Number 42 |
618 |
Slide Number 43 |
619 |
Slide Number 44 |
620 |
Slide Number 45 |
621 |
Slide Number 46 |
622 |
Slide Number 47 |
623 |
INTERTECC Trial: Multi-centric International Study |
624 |
Slide Number 49 |
625 |
Slide Number 50 |
626 |
INTERTECC Preliminary Data: Jan 2015 |
627 |
Slide Number 52 |
628 |
Slide Number 53 |
629 |
Slide Number 54 |
630 |
Slide Number 55 |
631 |
SUMMARY |
632 |
15.GEC ESTRO II ICRU 89 RP2015v3_KTRP with TP_clean |
633 |
Slide Number 1 |
633 |
Recommendations, DVH parameters |
634 |
Slide Number 3 |
635 |
ICRU/GEC ESTRO recommendations for gyneacological brachytherapy |
636 |
Learning Objectives (I) |
637 |
Learning Objectives (II) |
638 |
Three levels of reporting |
639 |
Level 1 - Minimum standard for reporting |
640 |
Level 1 – minimum standard for reporting |
641 |
Slide Number 11 |
642 |
Slide Number 13 |
643 |
Level 1 – minimum standard for reporting |
644 |
Point-A based brachytherapy |
645 |
Slide Number 16 |
646 |
Overall Treatment Time (BT, EBRT, total) |
647 |
When comparing total dose to point A and total dose to 90% of the HR CTV (D90) |
648 |
DVH Parameters and Reference Points, |
649 |
3D-based Dose Volume Parameters for OAR |
650 |
Slide Number 21 |
651 |
Slide Number 22 |
652 |
D2cm3 for rectum is endpoint for |
653 |
DVH Parameters for organs at risk (ICRU 89) |
654 |
Bladder |
655 |
Rectum |
656 |
Sigmoid |
657 |
ICRU point dose and D2cc doses |
658 |
D2cc and D0.1cc |
659 |
D2cm3 and D0.1cm3 for OAR |
660 |
Level 2 - Advanced standard for reportingAll that is reported in level 1 plus (ICRU 89): |
661 |
Overview of the adaptive target concept in cervix cancer stage IB, IIB, IIIB |
662 |
Slide Number 33 |
663 |
Slide Number 34 |
664 |
Level 2 - Advanced standard for reportingAll that is reported in level 1 plus (ICRU 89): |
665 |
DVH-parameters CTV-THR (ICRU 89) |
666 |
Dose and Volume Parameters (Vienna data 1998-2008) |
667 |
DVH parameters targets:GTV, CTV-HR, CTV-IR |
668 |
Dose in D90 and HR CTV for point A prescriptionHigh Target Doses in small tumoursLow Target Doses in large tumours |
669 |
Consequences of prescribing to Point-A |
670 |
Level 2 - Advanced standard for reportingAll that is reported in level 1 plus (ICRU 89): : |
671 |
DVH Parameters and Reference Points, |
672 |
Vaginal dose assessment and reporting |
673 |
Vaginal reference points |
674 |
Slide Number 45 |
675 |
DVH Parameters and Reference Points, Vaginal point: variations in application |
676 |
D2cm3 and D0.1cm3 for OAR are recommended |
677 |
General principles for reporting of physical and equieffective EBRT and BT dose (ICRU/GEC ESTRO report 88) |
678 |
Pelvic EBRT (elective) + BT |
679 |
Calculation of EQD2 in spreadsheet |
680 |
When adding doses from EBRT and BT You assume for the HR CTV for BT that |
681 |
When adding doses from EBRT and BT You assume for the 2 cm3 for OAR that |
682 |
Limitations of adding doses according to „ICRU point-3D model“ both for CTV and OAR |
683 |
How could this happen? |
684 |
Be aware of IMRT hot spots in the BT region! |
685 |
DVHs for different contributions of EBRT and BTand specific morbidityendpoints |
686 |
From Planning aims to Prescription |
687 |
Need for common terminology according to ICRU reports on proton treatment and IMRT |
688 |
Planning aim and prescription dose |
689 |
Planning aim and prescription dose |
690 |
Example (Appendix case 5, ICRU 89) |
691 |
Example – disease at BT (Appendix case 5, ICRU 89) |
692 |
Example (Appendix case 5, ICRU 89) |
693 |
Example (Appendix case 5, ICRU 89)Applicators and EQD210 isodose surface volumes |
694 |
Example (dose points) (Appendix case 5, ICRU 89) |
695 |
Example (DVH parameters) (Appendix case 5, ICRU 89) |
696 |
16.KT_clinical evidence for dose effects Toronto_final_clean |
697 |
DOSE EFFECT RELATIONSHIP POINT A |
698 |
Slide Number 3 |
699 |
Clinical Evidence in IGABT Cervix Cancer |
700 |
RetroEMBRACE |
701 |
EMBRACE study |
702 |
|
703 |
Heterogeneity of dose prescription: Bladder D2cc |
704 |
Recurrences according to dose and volume |
705 |
Actuarial local controlHR CTV dose and volume |
706 |
Dose, volume, and time effect |
707 |
Dose volume response for GTV |
708 |
Dose effect GTV, CTVHR and CTVIR |
709 |
Combined constraints for GTV and CTVHR |
710 |
Practice in EMBRACE I |
711 |
EMBRACE practice |
712 |
EMBRACE II dose prescription |
713 |
Beach boy approach – Barcelona 2013 |
714 |
Bladder D2cm3 |
715 |
Rectum D2cm3 |
716 |
Slide Number 21 |
717 |
Vaginal stenosis ICRU recto-vaginal point (630 pts) |
718 |
Slide Number 23 |
719 |
Slide Number 24 |
720 |
Sigmoid D2cm3, preliminary data |
721 |
Bowel D2cm3, preliminary data |
722 |
Slide Number 27 |
723 |
Slide Number 28 |
724 |
Planning aim and prescription dose |
725 |
Planning aim and prescription dose |
726 |
Conclusion (I) |
727 |
What is the proposed planning aim for CTVHR – indicate all correct answers |
728 |
Which treatment plan would you prefer? |
729 |
Which treatment plan would you prefer? |
730 |
17.KT_physics aspects intracav interst Toronto 2016_final_clean |
731 |
Limitation of standard loading pattern with dose prescription to point A |
732 |
With dose optimisation in a small tumour... |
733 |
Tools for dose optimisation |
734 |
Slide Number 5 |
735 |
Graphical dose optimisation – “drag and drop” |
736 |
Inverse dose optimisation |
737 |
Slide Number 8 |
738 |
Example 1: good response stage IB2 Standard plan |
739 |
Example 1Manual dose optimisation |
740 |
Example 1, DVH |
741 |
Example 1, summary |
742 |
Example 2, Stage IIBStandard plan |
743 |
Example 2Manual dose optimisation |
744 |
Example 2, DVH |
745 |
Example 2, summary |
746 |
Example 3, Stage IIIBStandard dose plan |
747 |
Example 3Manually optimised plan |
748 |
Loading of needles: dwell times and isodoses |
749 |
Example 3, DVH |
750 |
Example 3, summary |
751 |
Example 3, inverse planning |
752 |
When to use graphical dose optimisation (dose shaper)? |
753 |
When to use graphical dose optimisation (dose shaper)? |
754 |
Typical scenarios of dose optimisation |
755 |
Conclusion – optimisation techniques |
756 |
PTV margins |
757 |
Example contouring uncertainty |
758 |
Vaginal dose de-escalation |
759 |
Volume is important! |
760 |
Volume is important! |
761 |
Point A dose and HR CTV volumeEMBRACE - Intracavitary applications |
762 |
Importance of needles |
763 |
Take home message – dose optimisation |
764 |
I prefer to do optimisation |
765 |
With dose optimisation in a small tumour... |
766 |
18.RadioBiologyModels to combine EBRT and BT DB(Questions)Toronto_2016_clean |
767 |
Slide Number 1 |
767 |
Which dose rates are you mainly using at your department for GYN ? |
768 |
Are you correcting for the radio-biological effect ? |
769 |
Which of the following radiobiological effect(s) is(are) taken into account in the EQD2 calculationwhen using the LQ-model? |
770 |
Slide Number 5 |
771 |
Slide Number 6 |
772 |
Slide Number 7 |
773 |
Slide Number 9 |
774 |
Slide Number 10 |
775 |
Slide Number 11 |
776 |
Slide Number 12 |
777 |
Slide Number 13 |
778 |
Slide Number 14 |
779 |
Slide Number 15 |
780 |
Slide Number 16 |
781 |
Slide Number 17 |
782 |
Slide Number 19 |
783 |
Slide Number 20 |
784 |
Slide Number 21 |
785 |
Slide Number 22 |
786 |
Slide Number 23 |
787 |
Slide Number 24 |
788 |
A single fraction HDR dose of 7Gy to the tumour corresponds to a EQD2 of |
789 |
Slide Number 26 |
790 |
Slide Number 27 |
791 |
Which of the following radiobiological effect(s) is(are) taken into account in the EQD2 calculationwhen using the LQ-model? |
792 |
Slide Number 33 |
793 |
Slide Number 34 |
794 |
Slide Number 35 |
795 |
19.KT_inter and intra fraction uncertainties Toronto 2016_final_clean |
796 |
Largest dose uncertainty for target? |
797 |
Largest dose uncertainty OARs? |
798 |
Uncertainties in the high gradient BT dose distribution |
799 |
The 6 steps of IGABT |
800 |
Contouring uncertaintiesHR-CTV on MRI |
801 |
Impact of contouring uncertainties on dose |
802 |
Applicator reconstruction uncertaintiesMRI based intracavitary/interstitial brachytherapy |
803 |
Reconstruction uncertainties |
804 |
Fusion uncertainties |
805 |
Definition of inter-intra fraction/application uncertainties |
806 |
Slide Number 12 |
807 |
”Worst case assumption”Calculation of DVH for several fractions |
808 |
Different location of hotspots |
809 |
Influence of organ deformation |
810 |
Bladder dose accumulation with deformable registration (biomechanical) |
811 |
DVH addition |
812 |
Largest dose uncertainty for target? |
813 |
Largest dose uncertainty OARs? |
814 |
Total uncertainties |
815 |
Impact of uncertainties on total dose |
816 |
Examples total dose and uncertainty |
817 |
Dosimetric uncertainties and dose-response relationships |
818 |
Effect of uncertainties on observed dose response relationships |
819 |
Slide Number 25 |
820 |
Slide Number 26 |
821 |
Image modality? |
822 |
Pre-BT MRI + CT |
823 |
Slide Number 29 |
824 |
Slide Number 30 |
825 |
Pre-BT MRI + CT |
826 |
1st application: MRI |
827 |
2nd application: CT |
828 |
2nd application: CT |
829 |
MR imaging and treatment planning for every fraction? |
830 |
What is possible in your department? |
831 |
20.CARO ESTRO course April 5 2016 (1) |
832 |
Slide Number 1 |
832 |
Outline |
833 |
Why Brachytherapy? |
834 |
Brachytherapy utilization rate in 18 SEER registries |
835 |
Survival by brachytherapy use |
836 |
The Impact of New TechnologicalAdvancements |
837 |
Slide Number 7 |
838 |
Canadian Practice Survey |
839 |
Slide Number 9 |
840 |
What imaging do you perform after applicator insertion for applicator position verification and/or treatment planning? |
841 |
Dose prescription |
842 |
Brachytherapy Dose-Fractionation |
843 |
How often do you use interstitial needles? |
844 |
Is MR simulation available? |
845 |
What is the current status of MR-guided brachytherapy (full 3D planning) at your centre? |
846 |
What are/were the barriers to implementing MR-guided brachytherapy? |
847 |
Slide Number 17 |
848 |
Key Quality-of-Care Indicators |
849 |
Endorsed Brachytherapy KQIs |
850 |
Aspirational Brachytherapy KQIs |
851 |
Slide Number 21 |
852 |
PM Brachytherapy Technique |
853 |
Increase in uterine volume & HRCTV during PDR brachytherapy |
854 |
PM Brachytherapy Technique |
855 |
PM HDR Brachytherapy Process |
856 |
Slide Number 26 |
857 |
Slide Number 27 |
858 |
PM Brachytherapy Technique |
859 |
Stage IVA Cervical SCC |
860 |
Stage IVA Cervical SCC |
861 |
Stage IVA Cervical SCC |
862 |
Slide Number 32 |
863 |
PM Brachytherapy Technique |
864 |
Vaginal recurrence of cervical adenocarcinoma after trachelectomy |
865 |
Slide Number 35 |
866 |
Slide Number 36 |
867 |
Slide Number 37 |
868 |
Slide Number 38 |
869 |
Slide Number 39 |
870 |
Planning Aims |
871 |
Inter-Observer Variability Among Experts |
872 |
Slide Number 42 |
873 |
Slide Number 43 |
874 |
Slide Number 44 |
875 |
Slide Number 45 |
876 |
MR-Guided Radiotherapy Suite |
877 |
MR-Guided Brachytherapy Suite |
878 |
MR-Guided Brachytherapy Suite |
879 |
Summary |
880 |
Acknowledgements |
881 |
21.Vie003_JR(caseSummary) |
882 |
Slide Number 1 |
882 |
Slide Number 2 |
883 |
Slide Number 3 |
884 |
Slide Number 4 |
885 |
Slide Number 5 |
886 |
Slide Number 6 |
887 |
Slide Number 7 |
888 |
Slide Number 8 |
889 |
Slide Number 9 |
890 |
Slide Number 10 |
891 |
Slide Number 11 |
892 |
Slide Number 12 |
893 |
Slide Number 13 |
894 |
Slide Number 14 |
895 |
Slide Number 15 |
896 |
Slide Number 16 |
897 |
22.Practical-DoseReporting |
898 |
Slide Number 1 |
898 |
Slide Number 2 |
899 |
Slide Number 3 |
900 |
Slide Number 4 |
901 |
Slide Number 5 |
902 |
Bladder Bicru / D2cm3 ratio |
903 |
Slide Number 7 |
904 |
„ICRU 89“ Reference Points |
905 |
Slide Number 9 |
906 |
Slide Number 10 |
907 |
Slide Number 11 |
908 |
Slide Number 12 |
909 |
Slide Number 13 |
910 |
Slide Number 14 |
911 |
Slide Number 15 |
912 |
Slide Number 16 |
913 |
24.Morbidity and QoL Rect, Bowel, Bladder, Vagina RP 2016 |
914 |
Morbidity and QoL after IGABT in Cervix CancerRectum, Sigmoid, Bladder, Vagina |
914 |
Learning Objectives I |
915 |
Patients with baseline and follow up informationbladder, bowel, rectum |
916 |
Late Morbidity: Bladder |
917 |
Slide Number 5 |
918 |
Slide Number 6 |
919 |
Bladder frequency |
920 |
Bladder frequency |
921 |
PROM bladder frequency |
922 |
Bladder Incontinence |
923 |
Bladder incontinence |
924 |
PROM bladder incontinence |
925 |
Bladder cystitis |
926 |
Bladder cystitis |
927 |
Bladder bleeding |
928 |
Analysis of single- or groups of symptoms? |
929 |
Late Morbidity: GI, Rectum, Bowel |
930 |
Overview (CTCAE) |
931 |
Slide Number 19 |
932 |
Prevalence for bleeding, proctitis, fistula, stenosis (rectum) |
933 |
Actuarial estimate of bleeding, proctitis, fistula, stenosis |
934 |
Prevalence and actuarial cumulative incidence: rectal morbidity |
935 |
Late Morbidity: GI, Rectum, Bowel |
936 |
Slide Number 24 |
937 |
Prevalence rates for all gradings of diarrhea, CTCAE |
938 |
Slide Number 26 |
939 |
Slide Number 27 |
940 |
Prevalence rates for all gradings of diarrhea, EORTC |
941 |
Prevalence rates for all gradings of difficulty controlling bowel, EORTC |
942 |
Prevalence rates for all gradings of incontinence, CTCAE |
943 |
Slide Number 31 |
944 |
Slide Number 32 |
945 |
Late Morbidity: Vagina |
946 |
Vaginal stenosis |
947 |
Vaginal length reduction |
948 |
Telangiectasia |
949 |
Slide Number 37 |
950 |
Adhesions |
951 |
Vaginal occlusion |
952 |
Patterns of manifestation: Prevalence rates and Actuarial estimates |
953 |
Patterns of manifestation: Prevalence rates and Actuarial estimates |
954 |
Vaginal morbidity after definitive radiochemotherapy + IGABT in LACC |
955 |
Crude incidence, rates for single vaginal endpoints |
956 |
Summary & Conclusion |
957 |
Late Morbidity: others |
958 |
Slide Number 46 |
959 |
Slide Number 47 |
960 |
summaryduring and early after treatment |
961 |
long-term Quality of life |
962 |
long-term patient reported symptoms |
963 |
long-term patient reported symptoms |
964 |
long-term impact on sexuality |
965 |
summary |
966 |
Learning Objectives II |
967 |
Slide Number 55 |
968 |
Slide Number 56 |
969 |
Inter-rater reliability of CTCAE morbidity assessment |
970 |
Slide Number 58 |
971 |
Slide Number 59 |
972 |
EORTC / FACT QoL |
973 |
Agreement physician assessed vs. Patient reported symptoms |
974 |
Slide Number 62 |
975 |
Possible explanations |
976 |
Summary & Conclusion |
977 |
25.Disease Control_after IGABT RPv3 ESTRO TC Toronto |
978 |
Slide Number 1 |
978 |
Slide Number 2 |
979 |
Slide Number 3 |
980 |
Slide Number 4 |
981 |
Slide Number 5 |
982 |
Clinical Evidence in IGABT Cervix Cancer |
983 |
Image guided adpative brachytherapy (IGBT) cervix cancerLocal Control and Cancer Specific Survival (1998-2003)TREATMENT PERIOD (-/+ IGABT) AND TUMOUR SIZE |
984 |
Slide Number 8 |
985 |
CONTINUOUS COMPLETE REMISSION 3 YEARS*VIENNA 1993-2003: 335 patients |
986 |
CONCLUSIONS (Vienna experience 1998-2008) |
987 |
Better local control = improved survival |
988 |
Overall treatment time (OTT) |
989 |
morbidity 3y ≥G3: 10% 3% |
990 |
Multicenter studies with IGABT in cervix ca. |
991 |
From 2D – 3DX Ray vs CT/MRI (STIC trial) |
992 |
|
993 |
Slide Number 17 |
994 |
Slide Number 18 |
995 |
Local control – advanced treatment adaptationincluding interstitial brachytherapy (RetroEMBRACE) |
996 |
Slide Number 20 |
997 |
Slide Number 21 |
998 |
Slide Number 22 |
999 |
Systemic (distant) recurrence analysis (EMBRACE data, 133 events in 753 patients) |
1000 |
Slide Number 24 |
1001 |
Slide Number 25 |
1002 |
Provisional comparison DVH parameters & local controlbased on multi-centre experience |
1003 |
Interpretation of RetroEMBRACE results (IGABT compared to large population based cohorts 2D BT) |
1004 |
Slide Number 28 |
1005 |
Interpretation of RetroEMBRACE results (IGABT compared to large population based cohorts 2D BT) |
1006 |
Paradoxon! |
1007 |
Slide Number 31 |
1008 |
LOCAL CONTROL - CLINICAL DATA/AIMSDOSE at POINT A vs. as D90 IN IMAGE GUIDED ADAPTIVE BT |
1009 |
Slide Number 33 |
1010 |
Acknowledgements Gyn GEC ESTRO networkEMBRACE study and research group, ICRU report committee |
1011 |
26.KT_Embrace and GYN network RP KT Toronto_final |
1012 |
GEC-ESTRO gyn network and EMBRACE I and II |
1012 |
Gyn GEC ESTRO NETWORK R&D, Educ. since 5/2005, coordinator Medical Uni.Vienna and Aarhus Uni.Hosp. |
1013 |
RetroEMBRACE |
1014 |
EMBRACE study |
1015 |
Slide Number 5 |
1016 |
EMBRACE II design |
1017 |
EMBRACE II interventions |
1018 |
EMBRACE II dose prescription |
1019 |
EMBRACE II interventions |
1020 |
Vaginal dose de-escalation |
1021 |
EMBRACE II interventions |
1022 |
IMRT + daily IGRT |
1023 |
EMBRACE II interventions |
1024 |
Target concept related to primary tumour |
1025 |
Workflow target contouring |
1026 |
Internal target volume |
1027 |
EMBRACE II interventions |
1028 |
EBRT dose prescription |
1029 |
EMBRACE II interventions |
1030 |
Target concept related to elective lymph nodes |
1031 |
Target concept related to elective lymph nodes |
1032 |
EMBRACE II interventions |
1033 |
Administration of chemotherapy in EMBRACE I |
1034 |
EMBRACE II interventions |
1035 |
Control of OTT: 3 examples of schedules |
1036 |
Accreditation and dummy run for new centers |
1037 |
Accreditation and dummy run for new centers |
1038 |
Roadmap EMBRACE II |
1039 |
Information about EMBRACE, retro-EMBRACE and 3D Gyn GEC ESTRO network |
1040 |
27.Tips_and_tricks_RP-DB-UM_Toronto |
1041 |
Slide Number 1 |
1041 |
Slide Number 2 |
1042 |
Slide Number 3 |
1043 |
Slide Number 4 |
1044 |
Slide Number 5 |
1045 |
Slide Number 6 |
1046 |
Slide Number 7 |
1047 |
DOWN THE DECADES CANCER CERVIX : TATA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 1941-2010 |
1048 |
Slide Number 9 |
1049 |
Slide Number 10 |
1050 |
Slide Number 11 |
1051 |
Slide Number 12 |
1052 |
Slide Number 13 |
1053 |
Slide Number 14 |
1054 |
Slide Number 15 |
1055 |
Slide Number 16 |
1056 |
Slide Number 17 |
1057 |
Slide Number 18 |
1058 |
Slide Number 19 |
1059 |
Slide Number 20 |
1060 |
Slide Number 21 |
1061 |
Slide Number 22 |
1062 |
Dosimetric Comparison (1# BT) |
1063 |
Slide Number 24 |
1064 |
Slide Number 25 |
1065 |
Slide Number 26 |
1066 |
Slide Number 27 |
1067 |
Slide Number 28 |
1068 |
Slide Number 29 |
1069 |
Slide Number 30 |
1070 |
Slide Number 31 |
1071 |
Slide Number 32 |
1072 |
Slide Number 33 |
1073 |
Slide Number 34 |
1074 |
Train Your Contouring and passyour knowledge to your friends ;) |
1075 |
Slide Number 36 |
1076 |
28.Wiebe EdmontonEstro-CaroCOP_EW |
1077 |
MR-based Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer |
1077 |
Cross Cancer Institute |
1078 |
MR-BT at CCI |
1079 |
Current workflow for MR-BT |
1080 |
The Team (2007 – present) |
1081 |
Radiotherapy for Cervix Ca |
1082 |
Slide Number 7 |
1083 |
Bulky Tumour, Partial Response |
1084 |
Implementation of MR-BT |
1085 |
What helped |
1086 |
What helped |
1087 |
Current Topics of Interest |
1088 |
Future opportunities? |
1089 |
Slide Number 14 |
1090 |
Milestones |
1091 |
29.Velker London Experience MR Guided Cervix Brachytherapy |
1092 |
MR Guided Cervix Brachytherapy:London Experience |
1092 |
London….Ontario |
1093 |
London Ontario Brachytherapy Program |
1094 |
Dose and fractionation |
1095 |
Brachytherapy Work flow (Implant #1) |
1096 |
Brachytherapy Work flow (Implant #2) |
1097 |
MR utilization |
1098 |
MR guided planning |
1099 |
“Hybrid” Interstitial |
1100 |
Slide Number 10 |
1101 |
Challenges |
1102 |
Current refinements in progress |
1103 |
Thank you |
1104 |
MR Guided Cervix Brachytherapy:London Experience |
1105 |
30.Contouring Study Proposal_EL APRIL 6 |
1106 |
Canadian Interstitial Brachytherapy Contouring Study:Vaginal Tumours |
1106 |
SunnybrookGYN Interstitial Brachytherapy |
1107 |
Interstitial Brachytherapy |
1108 |
3D Imaging |
1109 |
Contouring Variability |
1110 |
Contouring Study |
1111 |
Methods |
1112 |
Collaboration |
1113 |
Definitions |
1114 |
Contouring Variability |
1115 |
Slide Number 11 |
1116 |
Slide Number 12 |
1117 |
Methods |
1118 |
Slide Number 14 |
1119 |