Previous Page  124 / 431 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 124 / 431 Next Page
Page Background

August 2017

6-9

City of Morgan Hill

Sewer System Master Plan

During the V&A flow monitoring program; three rain gauges was set up in the City to record storm

events during the monitoring period shown on

Figure 6.2

. Data from the V&A flow monitoring

effort, as documented in the 2014 V&A Flow Monitoring Program, was used in this analysis to

calibrate the computer hydraulic model to average dry weather flow (ADWF) and peak wet

weather flow (PWWF) conditions.

6.3.3

Dynamic Model Calibration

The calibration process was iterative as it involved calibrating each of the 10 flow monitored sites

and for the three calibration conditions: 1) peak dry weather flow, 2) peak wet weather flows from

storm rainfall Event No. 1, and 3) peak wet weather flows from storm rainfall Event No. 2.

The rain events of February 26, 2014 to February 27, 2014 (Event No. 1) and February 28, 2014

to March 1, 2014 (Event No. 2), as listed on

Table 3.4

, were used to calibrate the hydraulic model

to the wet weather conditions. The diurnal curves for each of the 10 sites were extracted from the

2014 V&A Flow Monitoring Program and the data was used for comparison purposes with the

hydraulic model predictions. The calibration effort continued until it yielded acceptable results for

each site and for each of the three calibration conditions.

The calibration results for each flow monitoring site are documented in

Appendix B

. These

results indicate the calibration effort yielded reasonable comparisons between the flow monitoring

data and the hydraulic model predictions at the 10 sites. Representative extracts from

Appendix

B

are shown on

Figures 6.3

and

6.4

. After each of the calibration process has been completed,

the hydraulic model was benchmarked for further analysis and evaluation.

6.3.4

Use of the Calibrated Model

The calibrated hydraulic model was used as an established benchmark in the capacity evaluation

of the existing sanitary sewer system. The model was also used to identify improvements

necessary for mitigating existing system deficiencies and for accommodating future growth. The

hydraulic model is a valuable investment that will continue to prove its worth to the City as future

planning issues or other operational conditions surface. It is recommended that the model be

maintained and updated with new construction projects to preserve its integrity.