Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  25 / 363 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 25 / 363 Next Page
Page Background

© 2015 AOAC INTERNATIONAL

(

24

) Add approximately 200 mg sodium sulfate, anhydrous, to

each tube and vortex mix.

(

25

) Centrifuge at 2400 ×

g

RCF for 1 min.

(

26

) Decant the supernatant into a clean 15 mL tapered,

polypropylene tube.

(

27

) Evaporate the solvent to incipient dryness under nitrogen

at 40 ± 10°C.

Note

: Do not leave on heating block as excess heating may

degrade derivatized analyte.

(

28

) Allow tubes to return to near room temperature and then

redissolve residue in 150 µL acetonitrile.

(

29

) Vortex mix at low speed.

(

30

) Centrifuge at 2400 ×

g

RCF for 1 min.

(

31

) Transfer clear solvent layer to a tapered insert in an

autosampler vial, making sure not to transfer any solid and/or

particulate matter. Cap firmly.

Note

: Final extracts have been shown to be stable at least 5 days

when stored in the freezer at –10°C or below.

(

c

) 

Instrumental

determination

.—(

1

) 

Identification

parameters

.—Identification parameters for the analysis of sodium

fluoroacetic acid are given in Table

2015.02B

.

(

2

) 

Analytical instrumentation

.—(

a

)

 General

.—Agilent 1290

HPLC system coupled with a 5500 QTRAP Triple Quad Mass

Spectrometer. The system is controlled by AB Sciex Analyst

software. Peak integration is handled with AB Sciex MultiQuant

Analysis software.

Note

:

See

Figure

2015.02B

for exemplary chromatograms.

(

b

) 

LC parameters

.—

See

Table

2015.02C

for HPLC solvent

gradient.

(

i

) 

Column

.—Agilent XDB-C18, 100 × 4.6 mm.

(

ii

) 

Guard column

.—Phenomenex Security C18, 4 × 2 mm.

(

c

) 

Mass spectrometer parameters

.—

See

Table

2015.02D

for

full analytical parameters.

G. Calculations

Quantification of fluoroacetic acid is based on peak area. Matrix

recoveries are used to generate calibration

curves.An

unknown peak

that falls within the evaluation window (as calculated by recoveries

and internal standard) is quantified from the appropriate calibration

curve and the value tabulated, together with peak identification

information. Each potential unknown is then manually assessed for

the quality of identification by viewing integrated chromatograms

and those of any qualifying ions.

C

u

=

RR

/

Sl

where

C

u

= concentration of unknown sample in µg/kg;

RR

=

relative response of unknown sample;

Sl

= slope of calibration

curve.

H. Method Performance and Quality Control

(

a

) 

Reagent blank test

.—A reagent blank (deionized water) test

is performed with each batch.

(

b

) 

Matrix standard test

.—Performed with each batch according

to Table

2015.02A

.

(

c

) 

Matrix blank test (Recovery 1)

.—A matrix blank test is

performed with each batch.

(

d

) 

Matrix recovery test (recovery samples)

.—Performed with

each batch according to Table

2015.02A

.

(

e

) 

Certified reference materials (CRM)

.—No CRM is currently

available. In practice, external checks of the method are performed

by participation in interlaboratory calibration studies when

available.

(

f

) 

Performance values

.—Values found in Table

2015.02E

are

calculated from the in-house single-laboratory validation (SLV)

completed by AsureQuality Ltd.

(

g

) 

Acceptance criteria

.—(

1

) 

Individual sample acceptance

criteria

.—The internal standard response for an individual sample

should exceed 33% of the mean internal standard response of the

recovery samples.

(

2

) 

Batch acceptance criteria

.—Analyte relative recoveries for

the recovery samples should be within 3 SD of the mean relative

recovery established from control charts. Calibration curves should

have a coefficient of determination R

> 0.95.

(

3

) 

Positive sample acceptance criteria

.—Retention time

acceptance criteria are given in Table

2015.02F

. Ion ratio

acceptance limits are given in Table

2015.02G

.

Table 2015.02F. Relative retention time (RRT) and limits of acceptance

Compound (3-nitroaniline derivative of analyte)

Monitored compounds

RRT

Acceptance limit

a

2-Fluoro-3

ʹ

-nitroacetanilide

Analyte/internal standard

1.004

b

RRT ± 2.5%

a

See

reference 2.

b

 Representative relative retention time. These values are indicative and should be measured for each individual batch.

Table 2015.02E. Performance values of analytes

a

Compound

LOD, µg/kg LOQ, µg/kg LOR, µg/kg Within-day CV

Between-day CV

(WLR)

U

(for 95% CI)

Recovery, %

(SD)

Fluoroacetic acid

0.028

0.085

1.0

b

8.8

9.1

18

97

c

(8.8)

13

C

2

D

2

Fluoroacetic acid

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

70

d

(12)

a

LOD = Limit of detection; LOQ = limit of quantification; CV = coefficient of variation; WLR = within-laboratory reproducibility; U = uncertainty of measurement

with a 95% confidence interval; SD = standard deviation.

b

 Limit of reporting (LOR) set according to New Zealand maximum permitted residue limits.

See

reference 1.

c

 Relative recovery.

d

 Absolute recovery.

Candidates for 2016 Method of the Year

24