Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  18-19 / 84 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 18-19 / 84 Next Page
Page Background

BALKAN VITAL GRAPHICS

18

BACKGROUND

MINING

WATER

NATURE

19

conflicts. The Danube was closed to navi-

gation for a few years, due to NATO bomb-

ing in 1999 which destroyed several bridges

preventing river traffic. Today, all the bridges

have been rebuilt and navigation has been

reopened in the area.

A number of oil pipelines are currently under

study or construction in the Balkans: the US

registered Albanian-Macedonian-Bulgarian

Oil Corporation (AMBO) project will carry oil

from the Caspian to the Mediterranean, via

Bulgaria, Macedonia and Albania; the Adria

Group project will channel Russian oil to the

Omisalj terminal on the Croatian coast. The

presence of President Putin, of Russia, at

Southeast Europe’s first energy summit in

Zagreb in June 2007, emphasised the re-

gion’s strategic importance to his country. It

should be borne in mind that many Balkan

countries suffer a serious energy deficit, fur-

ther aggravated by the closure of four out of

six units of the nuclear power plant at Ko-

zloduy, Bulgaria, by 2006.

Bakou

ÉGYPTE

LIBYE

Moscow

Chisinau

Tbilisi

Erevan

Baku

Minsk

Warsaw

Ankara

Istanbul

Ceyhan

Ashkhabad

Tashkent

Dushanbe

Bishkek

Alma-Ata

New Delhi

GEORGIA

ARMENIA

AZERBAIJAN

Nakhitchevan

(Azer.)

TURKEY

BULGARIA

ROMANIA

MOLDOVA

UKRAINE

Kiev

HUNGARY

Budapest

SERBIA

GREECE

CYPRUS

SYRIA

LEBANON

ISRAEL

JORDAN

IRAQ

IRAN

TURKMENISTAN

UZBEKISTAN

TAJIKISTAN

KAZAKHSTAN

RUSSIA

RUSSIA

CHINA

PAKISTAN

AFGHANISTAN

INDIA

SAUDI

ARABIA

CZECH REP.

.

SLOVAKIA

MACEDONIA

Isfahan

Shiraz

Tabriz

Abadan

Tehran

Meshed

Kerman

Turkmenbashi

Astana

Aktau

Aterau

Kuvandyk

Karaganda

Atassu

Karakoya Kol

LAKE

BALKHA SH

Novossibirsk

ARAL

SEA

MEDITERRANEAN

BLACKSEA

AEGEAN

Tuapse

Novorossijsk

Krasnodar

Supsa

Chechnya

Samara

Volgograd

Ufa

Tyumen

Tomsk

Omsk

Erzurum

Orenburg

Alexandrov

Gaj

Bejneu

Burgas

Sofia

Bucharest

Alexandroupolis

Constanta

Odessa

GUNESHLI

CHIRAG

AZERI

TENGIZ

KASHA

CHECHNYABYPASS

GAN

Druzh ba

Alashanku

TRANSCASPIAN

CORRIDOR

CENTRALASIA–

CENTREGAS

PIPELINE (CAC-4)

WESTERNLEG

EASTERNLEG

GASPIPELINETAPI

OILPIPELINEBTC

GASPIPELINE

BTE

GASPIPELINE

BLUESTREAM

KCTS

(OILPIPELINETO

KURYKTHEN TANKERS)

TURKMENISTAN-CHINA

GASPIPELINE

POLAND

LANDS

NETHER-

AUSTRIA

LITHUANIA

LATVIA

ALBANIA

CROATIA

BOSNIA and

HERZEGOVINA

MONTENEGRO

Kosovo

SEAOF

AZOV

Saratov

Kazan

Rostov

CASPIANPIPELINE

CONSORTIUM-CPC

Neka

Brody

Vlorë

OIL

BAP

PIPELINE

AMBO

Belgrade

Omisalj

Gdansk

Prague

Trieste

Rostock

Saint Petersburg

Jaroslavl

Perm

Kherson

Niznij-

Novgorod

Vyborg

GASPIPELINE

NABUCCO

Berlin

BALTICAND

POLANDBYPASS:

NORTHERNEUROPEAN

GASPIPELINE

ANDBALTICOILPIPELINE (BPS)-

Primorsk

Greifswald

OILPIPELINE

ADRIA

REVERSAL

DRUJBA

EXPANSION

GASPIPELINE

YAMALEUROPE

TCGP

Crimea

ESTONIA

SWEDEN

DENMARK

GERMANY

SLOVENIA

RUSSIA

FINLAND

BALTICSEA

NORTH

SEA

Tallinn

Riga

Helsinki

Vilnius

KYRGYZSTAN

KAZAKHSTAN-CHINA

OILPIPELINE

Herat

Kabul

Islamabad

GASPIPELINE IPI

Kuryk

PALESTINE

Athens

Tirana

ITALY

Vienna

Bratislava

SWITZ.

CASPIAN

SEA

Bosphorus

KUWAIT

Abkhazia

BELARUS

Baghdad

Iujny

TANKERS

TANKERS

Political and economic alliances

of the GUAM: Georgia, Ukraine, Azerbaijan, Moldavia

(a pro-western organisation)

of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO)

of the European Union

Major oil and gas pipeline projects

China

Russia

the United States

the European Union

Iran

of the Union of Russia and Belarus

Chossing a route: geostrategic ‘bypass’ policies

Territory which is largely not under state control and

where the security of oil and gas pipelines cannot

be guaranteed

Member and observer countries

of both the SCO and the Union of Russia and Belarus

The oil and gas pipeline ‘war’

Major oil and gas fields

Ex-USSR pipeline network

MAP BY PHILIPPE REKACEWICZ, 2007

Envisaged

Existing or under

construction

and/or renovation

Supported by

Other very important pipelines

Territory that players in the Great Game say should be avoided

when planning the transport of oil and gas from the point

of extraction to the main markets (US, Europe,

China and Japan)

KCTS

The US and European Union

are seeking at all costs to

establish supply lines across the southern Caucasus,

the Black Sea, and Turkey, thus avoiding Russian and

Iranian territory (although the Europeans are consider-

ing a gas pipeline across the north of Iran).

Russia

is trying to control the oil and gas routes across

transit countries (Georgia, Ukraine, Belarus, Hungary

and Poland). On 12 May 2007 it signed an agreement

with Turkmenistan and Kazakhstan to renovate the

CAC-4 gas pipeline, thus spoiling competing western

plans. It has also just commissioned a gas pipeline

allowing it to bypass Chechnya. Finally, Russia could

neutralise the Ukraine, Poland and the Baltic states as

transit countries by joining in the construction of gas

and oil pipelines across the Baltic sea (with direct

access to the German market) and from Burgas to

Alexandroupoli (avoiding, for historical and ecological

reasons, the Bosporus).

Azerbaijan

insists on bypassing its neighbour

Armenia, with which it is still in conflict.

Sources:Kazinform;WorldPressReview;Pravda;RiaNovosti;Agence

France-Presse (AFP);UnitedStatesDepartmentofEnergy (USDOE),Energy

InformationAdministration (EIA);RadioFreeEurope -RadioLiberty (RFE-RL);

AsianDevelopmentBank;Eurasianet; InterstateOilandGasTransport to

Europe (Inogate);TransportCorridorEurope-Caucasus (Traceca),European

Union,Tacisprogramme,2005;EnergyMapof theMiddleEastandCaspianSea

Areas,PetroleumEconomist,London,2006; InternationalEnergyAgency (IEA);

JeanRadvanyiandNicolasBeroushashvili, ‘Atlas’, Institutnationaldes langues

etcivilisationsduCaucasusorientales (Inalco), tobepublishedat theendof

2007;SaltanatBerdikeevaandErinMark, ‘Russianenergypolitics’,Eurasia21,

2006;Nabucco,Energyministersconference ‘Securityofgas supplies inEurope’,

Vienna, June2006

NB:TheCaspianPipelineConsortium (CPC) is supportedbyRussiabuthasa

numberofUS,OmaniandKazakh shareholders