Previous Page  30 / 52 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 30 / 52 Next Page
Page Background

FLOW MEASUREMENT + INSTRUMENTATION

M

easurement of flowing liquid in closed conduits is present

in many different applications in our daily life, e.g. water or

heat metering, gas metering, filling stations, in the chemical

industry, the food industry, for batching or for process regulation.

Usually liquid flowmeters are used to fulfil most of these

requirements. The demands of the application on flow

meters are high. We have a general expectation that

meters ‘show the correct value’, which is necessary

for correct billing. Without external help it is nor-

mally impossible to check whether a flowmeter

shows the correct values or not. Behind the

accuracy of flow meters is a relatively complex

system of calculations, standards, normative

documents and special calibration facilities with

special knowledge of the operators.

The transfer of measurable goods is regulated

metrologically in the area of custody transfer measure-

ment by the European Measuring Instruments Directive

2004/22/EG [1] the German Mess- und Eichgesetz [2] and the Eichord-

nung [3]. The requirements for suitability, usability and application

area are covered under general definitions. Special requirements

for flow meters are defined depending on the different applications.

Maximum Permissible Errors (MPE) depending on the measurand

(m³, kg or kWh) define the ‘accuracy requirements’ for the meters,

which have to be fulfilled by every single meter.

Many technical official standards and documents are available

which the basis for comparable and repeatable measurements is. In

industrial metrology, many referenced guidelines for process appli-

cations exist to ensure correct installation of flow meters, where the

application can influence the meter measurement.

To achieve reproducible results andmeters which can be replaced

one for another, the flow meters have to be calibrated with the

same reference condition, which leads to traceable and comparable

measurements.

Traceability of measurements

The transfer of measurable goods generally requires a consistent

measurement of the units which are used like kilogram or metre. The

question about a standard definition of the measurands was

discussed by the ancient Egyptians and Romans. The goal

of the discussions was to achieve equal, comparable

and reproducible values of a measurand so that a

fair trade of the goods could be realised.

Definitions of reference lengths and refer-

ence weights can be found in a lot of different

areas of measurement. For a long time in Europe

these definitions were established by the local

kings.

The result was a huge number of different

standards for the kilogram, for example, and dif-

ficulties in conversion of these standards. In 1875 with

the Meter convention 17 different European countries

signed a contract to use the same reference kilogram and the

same reference meter and to establish an institution to keep these

standards.

For the first time this allowed traceability on the same standards.

Up to the present 51 states have signed this contract [4] and there are

two associated states. In addition to metre and kilogram, five new

measurands have been added. Since the 13

th

general conference of

mass and metre (CGPM) in 1960 the system is called SI-System, the

international unit system.

The SI-units today are kilogram, metre, second, Kelvin, ampere,

mole and candela. The transfer and traceability of the SI-units

has to be done by the national metrology institute of the different

countries. In Germany this is done by the Physikalisch-Technische

Bundesanstalt (PTB).

The technical definitions of the SI-units can be found at the home-

page of the PTB [5]. Next to the SI-units several additional derived

units exist, for example typical flow units as l/h, l/s, kg/s or kg/h.

Traceability

and

validation

of liquid

flow measurands

Dr. Nicolaus Mathies, Krohne Messtechnik GmbH, Duisburg

This article describes the requirements on liquid flow meters with regard to the

measurement accuracy.

Figure 1: Liquid flow calibration rig.

Electricity+Control

July ‘16

28