Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  191 / 412 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 191 / 412 Next Page
Page Background

open group were for surgical scar revision. The other major

complications observed in our PT patients included loss of

airway, bleeding, and tracheo-innominate artery fistula, all

well-known risks of PT.

As we did not find the route of tracheostomy formation

to influence the incidence of tracheal stenosis, we attemp-

ted to identify factors that may have contributed to stenosis

formation. Numerous and variable risk factors for tracheal

stenosis following intubation have been suggested in the

literature and include trauma and inflammation at the

endotracheal tube cuff site, excess granulation tissue

around the tracheal stoma site or over a fractured cartilage,

high tracheostomy site, prolonged intubation, traumatic

intubation, or previous intubation or tracheostomy.

1

Both

groups in this study received tracheostomy within 7 days

of admission as per American College of Surgeons recom-

mendations. Our study demonstrated that patients who

developed tracheal stenosis tended to have longer mechan-

ical ventilator requirements (26.7 vs 16.1 days,

P

5

.055),

with patients developing stenosis being on the ventilator on

average 11 additional days. It could be hypothesized that

additional ventilator days meant more time with an inflated

tracheal cuff causing tracheal ischemia and stenosis. We did

identify that younger age and longer length of ICU stay

were associated with increased rate of tracheal stenosis;

however, the reason for these findings is unclear and these

findings were not observed in similar studies.

There are several limitations to our study. It is retro-

spective in nature with a relatively small sample size. Also,

the study time frame included the widespread introduction

of the percutaneous technique at our institution. The

associated learning curve for a new procedure may have

influenced the results or influenced which technique was

used to create the tracheostomy in specific patients. Also,

the percentage of patients seen after dismissal from the

hospital was unknown.

Common shortcomings of other investigations into this

topic are length and reliability of follow-up, thereby

calling into question the accuracy of the reported inci-

dence of tracheal stenosis. We have a unique practice

environment in which there are 2 level-1 trauma centers

serving the entire population center with extremely rural

surroundings. This leads to an isolated trauma population

for study. These centers inform each other of any

complications or admissions from each other’s population.

Additionally, the next closest trauma center for follow-up

for tracheal symptoms is 200 miles away. Because of this,

we do not believe that any patients were lost to follow-up

or transferred to the other trauma center with a compli-

cation of tracheal stenosis. Also, in our city, if a patient

presented to one of the other large multispecialty groups,

then that patient would be redirected to our clinic.

Evidence for this rests in the fact that 5 of the 9 tracheal

stenosis patients presented to our clinic in a delayed

fashion well after hospital discharge. These factors help

distinguish our follow-up results as compared with other

studies. This said, there still exists the possibility that late

occurring and/or subclinical tracheal stenoses may have

Table 3

Comparison of demographics, injury severity, mechanism of injury, hospitalization details, disposition, and death for patients

with tracheal stenosis versus patients without tracheal stenosis

Parameter

Tracheal stenosis

No tracheal stenosis

P

value

Value

Value

No. of subjects

9 (1.5%)

607 (98.5%)

Age (years)

*

29.8

6

11.8

45.2

6

20.6

.021

Sex (male)

6 (66.7%)

452 (74.5%)

.701

Injury severity score

30.0 (19.5, 37.0)

25.0 (17.0, 33.0)

.175

Glasgow coma scale score

3.0 (3.0, 13.0)

5.0 (3.0, 14.0)

.659

Mechanism of injury

1.000

Blunt

9 (100.0%)

572 (94.2%)

Penetrating

0 (.0%)

31 (5.1%)

Drowning

0 (.0%)

2 (.3%)

Burn

0 (.0%)

2 (.3%)

Admission to tracheostomy interval (days)

9.3

6

7.9

7.0

6

4.9

.175

Intensive care unit days

*

28.3

6

18.8

18.9

6

13.3

.036

Mechanical ventilation days

*

26.7

6

21.7

16.1

6

11.7

.055

Hospital length of stay (days)

*

40.0

6

21.7

26.9

6

25.6

.127

Disposition

.604

Home/home with home health care/jail/mental health facility

2 (22.2%)

77 (12.7%)

Rehabilitation center/select specialty hospital acute care/

other acute hospitals

7 (77.8%)

42 (69.4%)

Skilled nursing unit/nursing home

0 (.0%)

28 (4.6%)

Hospice/death

0 (.0%)

80 (13.2%)

Death

0 (.0%)

75 (12.4%)

.610

*Mean

6

standard deviation.

Median (25th and 75th percentile).

W.W. Kettunen et al. Tracheostomy complications in trauma

171