Previous Page  37 / 68 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 37 / 68 Next Page
Page Background

ACQ

uiring knowledge

in

sp eech

,

language and hearing

, Volume 11, Number 1 2009

35

MULTICULTURALISM AND DYSPHAGIA

Sim, J. (1997).

Ethical decision making in therapy practice

.

Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.

Speech Pathology Australia. (2000).

Code of ethics

. Mel­

bourne: Author.

Speech Pathology Australia. (2003).

Scope of practice

.

Melbourne: Author.

Speech Pathology Australia. (2005a).

Dysphagia: Modified

barium swallow

. Melbourne: Author.

Speech Pathology Australia. (2005b).

Tracheostomy manage­

ment

. Melbourne: Author.

Speech Pathology Australia. (2007a).

Fibreoptic endoscopic

evaluation of swallowing

. Melbourne: Author.

Speech Pathology Australia. (2007b).

Parameters of practice:

Guidelines for delegation, collaboration and teamwork in speech

pathology practice

. Melbourne: Author.

Stanberry, B. (2000). Telemedicine: barriers and op­

portunities in the 21st century.

Journal of Internal Medicine

, 247,

615–628.

Theodoros, D. (2008). Telerehabilitation for service delivery

in speech-language pathology.

Journal of telemedicine and

Telecare

,

14

, 221–224.

United Nations. (1989).

Convention on the rights of the child

.

Geneva: Office of the United Nations Commissioner for

Human Rights.

United Nations. (2006).

Convention on the rights of persons

with disabilities

. Geneva: Office of the United Nations

Commissioner for Human Rights.

One workshop participant gave the example of an adult client

requesting and successfully managing scotch thickened to

accommodate his dysphagia, only to have this decision

overturned by a risk-averse management. A “one-size-fits-all”

approach to services is not working to ensure access and

equity for all actual and potential speech pathology clients.

Concluding comments

Our workplaces will continue to experience significant

societal, systemic and technological change, and in turn

influence our practice. We will not be able to anticipate,

prepare for, shield or pre-empt the impact of all these changes

on ethical provision of our services. Consequently we need to

stay vigilant, scanning the environment for trends and

changes that may influence our practice, discussing their

potential impacts on our services and engaging in CPD about

ethics. As McAllister (2006) has previously discussed, we

need to be ethically aware and think about ethics as a part of

our daily planning, delivery and evaluation of services, not

just as something that is called on when confronted with

“dilemmas” pertinent to individual clients.

References

Australian Government Productivity Commission. (2005).

Australia’s health workforce. Productivity Commission Research

Report

. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

Beauchamp, T., & Childress, J. (2009).

Principles of biomedical

ethics

(6th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Body, R. & McAllister, L. (in press).

Ethics in speech language

therapy

. London: Wiley & Sons.

Chetney, R. (2002). Interactive home telehealth: moving

from cost savings to reimbursement. Creative, proactive

strategies help agencies turn telehealth into a revenue

generator.

Telemed Today

,

9

(3), 19–20.

Cornford, T. & Klecun-Dabrowska, E. (2001). Ethical

perspectives in evaluation of telehealth.

Cambridge Quarterly

of Healthcare Ethics

,

10

, 161–169.

Cross, R., Leitão, S. & McAllister, L. (2008). Think big, act

locally: responding to ethical dilemmas.

ACQ

10(2) 39–41.

Eadie, P. & Atherton, M. (2008). Ethical conversations.

ACQ

10

(3), 92–94.

McAllister, L. (2006) Ethics in the workplace: More than just

using ethical decision making protocols.

ACQuiring Knowledge

in Speech, Language and Hearing

,

8

(2), 76–80.

Reed, G., McLaughlin, C. & Milholland, K. (2000). Ten

interdisciplinary principles for professional practice in

telehealth: Implications for psychology.

Professional Psychology:

Research and Practice

,

31

(2) 170–178.

Marie Atherton

is the Senior Advisor Professional Issues

at Speech Pathology Australia National Office in Mel­

bourne. In her current role Marie supports the manage­

ment of ethical complaints to the Association and

provides professional and clinical knowledge input to a

variety of project and policy activities.

Lindy McAllister

is a Senior Council Appointed

Member of the Ethics Board of Speech Pathology

Australia. She is currently Deputy Head (Teaching and

Learning) of the Mayne Medical School at the University

of Queensland. Lindy has a long history in teaching and

writing about ethics in speech pathology.

Correspondence to:

Marie Atherton

Senior Advisor Professional Issues

Speech Pathology Australia

Level 2, 11–19 Bank Place,

Melbourne VIC 3000

email:

matherton@speechpathologyaustralia.org.au

Would you like to contact more

than 4,200 speech pathologists?

Advertising in

ACQ

and

Speak Out

is a great way to spread your message to speech

pathologists in Australia and overseas.

We have different size advertising space available.

If you book in every issue for the whole year you’ll receive a 10% discount.

See

www.speechpathologyaustralia.org.au

for further information about advertising