Previous Page  6 / 56 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 6 / 56 Next Page
Page Background

CONSTRUCTION WORLD

JULY

2017

4

MARKETPLACE

The South African Institution of Civil

Engineering (SAICE) is perturbed that South

African civil engineering practitioners

are once again being ignored in favour of

engineers from abroad.

The Minister reported that the

Programme had led to black engineers

being given opportunity to gain work

experience from the Cuban engineers.

She said local companies and service

providers are often hesitant to support

black engineers, and to provide them with

accreditation. She continued by saying

that, “thanks to the Cuban programme,

black engineers who could previously not

obtain accreditation in the water industry,

have now been accredited”. The first

question that arises is whether the Cuban

technicians and engineers are registered

as professionals with the Engineering

Council of South Africa, a process that

every South African technician, technologist

and engineer have to do in order to obtain

accreditation and being registered as a

professional engineering practitioner.

South Africa has world-class civil

engineering professionals in hydrology

and hydraulics and water engineering in

general. There are many experts such

as Neil Macleod, who received the 2014

Stockholm Industry Water Award for “Most

progressive water utility in Africa” on

behalf of eThekwini Water & Sanitation,

in the Durban Municipality, South

Africa. The utility was awarded for its

transformative and inclusive approach

to providing water and sanitation

services. Manglin Pillay, CEO of SAICE,

states, “Our engineers are world-

renowned and very well

recognised globally, but

we don’t seem to be

having the same favour

here in South Africa!”

Should the DWS have launched their

“recruitment drive to find skilled

professionals to deal with South Africa’s

water problems” in South Africa, with the

same remuneration and incentives, SAICE

is confident that many a civil engineering

practitioner, who knows South Africa’s water

challenges inside out, would have been

available to assist the department in rural

communities, and in national and provincial

infrastructure departments. The money

spent on establishing and accommodating

the Cuban engineers in South Africa, could

possibly be better spent re-looking current

salaries and working environments in these

areas to the benefit of civil engineering

professionals, a number of whom are

unemployed due to the current economic

climate, thereby creating sustainable jobs

within South Africa.

Pillay emphasises, “Our engineers need

to get first choice. We have excellent,

experienced engineers both locally, as well

as those who are currently working outside

of South Africa.

“Government needs to make strides to

attract South African engineers back to

South Africa, and back into our government

sector where they are most needed. If there

is a shortage thereafter, then the whole

world can join us.”

On the issue of deployment and looking

at the above tasks, one could ask how

language would affect efficiency in capacity

building through training of staff – are

these the non-existent technical staff in

rural local authorities? The Cuban engineers

also have to adapt to performing and living

in a democracy, as Cuba is a communist

country. Learning the culture and the South

African environment could prove to be

extremely difficult.

Pillay explains, “Having to face these

challenges, overcome them, and

adjust to them could take at

least 18 months – that out

of a contract period of a few

years. Because of these

challenges, the

Cuban engineers

previously employed at

the Development Bank

of Southern Africa and

several government

departments in

Gauteng, were

simply not used

on projects,

and were

marginalised in

the work environment. Some complained

that they played video games and

downloaded stuff off the internet all day –

they were not incorporated into the South

African engineering teams.” Wasteful, not

only in the context of money lost for South

African engineers, but also for the Cubans,

away from their families and with little

constructive to do.

As SAICE and other voluntary industry

associations have pointed out over the

past five years, there is a serious shortage

of technically qualified managers in all

three tiers of government, which is of great

concern. However, bringing in Spanish-

speaking engineers is not a solution, as

their work spans only a couple of years.

Their presence will also not address the

issue of inappropriately qualified and

inexperienced persons appointed in

technical positions in government.

Pillay furthermore argues, “Importing

Cuban engineers has a possible unintended

cost, i.e. the lack of training and

developmental opportunities for our own

young engineers.

“It appears the weakness in government

structures is the lack of knowledge on how

to identify projects and how to spend the

allocated money. This is evident from the

lack of structures, processes and systems in

government to manage infrastructure spend.

Then there is the cauldron of unsuitably

qualified individuals, ineffectually occupying

technical engineering posts, nervously

managing engineering projects, and

second-guessing the allocation of funds.

It is necessary to re-install appropriately

qualified and professionally registered

technical people back into the system to

plan, identify, procure and manage large-

spend engineering projects.”

The National Development Plan, and the

State of the Nation addresses over the

past years, placed emphasis on job

creation and infrastructure development.

This affords SAICE the opportunity to

engage with government, and to serve as

the honest and non-biased broker for civil

engineering expertise to be installed back

into the system

Pillay concludes, “SAICE is seriously

perturbed about the import of Cuban

engineers and once again implores

government, and specifically the Department

of Water and Sanitation, to further engage

with us (SAICE), to find solutions. Together

we can solve South Africa’s problems.” In

this manner the Minister can avoid shooting

herself in the foot.

MINISTER STICKS

to her guns with Cubans

Replying to a question from the

National Council of Provinces,

Minister of Water and Sanitation,

Nomvula Mokonyane, defended

her department’s decision to

continue employing Cuban

technicians and engineers

to exchange skills within the

department’s Water Programme.

Manglin Pillay, CEO

of SAICE.