EuroWire – July 2008
25
And he even roped Messrs Calderón and Harper into sharply
criticising a decision by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to scuttle a vote
on a free trade agreement with Colombia. Senator John McCain,
the presumptive presidential nominee of Mr Bush’s own
Republican party, is a supporter of NAFTA and in general a
proponent of free trade.
Under NAFTA, the world’s largest trade bloc, trade among America,
Canada and Mexico will have risen to an estimated $1 trillion by the
end of this year, from roughly $290 billion in 1994. But it has aroused
various discontents in all three signatory countries, especially
in the US where a downturn in the economy is exacerbating
fears about job security. Opponents of expanded international
trade say it helps businesses but threatens American jobs and
keeps wages from growing. Mr Bush claims that Mrs Clinton and
Mr Obama are employing anti-trade arguments to attract the votes
of working-class Americans.
Somewhat taken aback to find herself under fire from three
❈
❈
heads of state, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi suggested
that her chamber might yet hold a vote on a trade agreement
with Colombia – if the Bush administration would consider
an expansion of unemployment benefits, and an increase in
training programmes to assist those US workers who lose their
jobs as companies move operations overseas.
“The American people want solutions on the economy and
less partisan rhetoric from the president,” Ms Pelosi said in a
statement. “Democrats have repeatedly told the president we
are willing to work with him in good faith to create jobs and
restore our economic strength.”
Mr Bush was not soothed. “She’s effectively killed [the deal
with Colombia],” he fumed, and reiterated his warning that
its failure would affect regional security by weakening the
Colombian president, Álvaro Uribe, and strengthening
Venezuela’s president, Hugo Chávez. Mr Chávez has been openly
contemptuous of the US, its president, and its policies in Latin
America.
As those who would be president focus
on Mexico, jobs lost to China go unremarked
Writing in the New York Times for 22
nd
April, Elizabeth Malkin
points out that the Democratic candidates are replaying the
arguments made against the North American Free Trade
Agreement in the early 1990s, when opponents like the
Texas data-processing tycoon Ross Perot argued that it would
create a “giant sucking sound” of jobs moving to Mexico. But much
has changed since then. “For a start,” said Ms Malkin, “Perot Systems,
which he helped found, has set up a Mexican subsidiary.”
In the first years under NAFTA, jobs did leave the United States for
Mexico. But Ms Malkin noted that, in this decade, American jobs lost
to China have vastly outnumbered those going to Mexico.
And Mexican companies are moving their own factories to countries
with an even lower wage scale – especially China, economist
Enrique Dussel Peters told the
Times
. Dr Dussel heads the Center
of China-Mexico Studies at the National Autonomous University of
Mexico, the largest university in Latin America.