Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  29 / 88 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 29 / 88 Next Page
Page Background

Transatlantic cable

July 2017

27

www.read-eurowire.com

In January, that testing led the EPA to accuse Fiat Chrysler

Automobiles NV of installing diesel Jeep SUVs and Ram pickups

with emission controls without the proper disclosures. The

agency has since refused to certify that Fiat Chrysler’s diesel Jeep

Grand Cherokee and Ram 1500 pickup variants conform to USA

tailpipe rules amid talks with the company to resolve the issues.

†

As for Daimler, by mid-spring it had put considerable e ort

into trying to get its diesels approved by the EPA. But, wrote

Mr Beene on 10

th

May, “[You can] put that process on hold as

the 2017 model year enters its nal months.”

Of related interest . . .

†

Even as it was second-guessing its USA diesel commitment,

Mercedes-Benz was recruiting Utah-based Vivint Solar to

introduce its home battery storage solution in the United

States. By summer, Vivint was to start selling the Mercedes

home batteries in California, to new customers only.

As noted by Sean O’Kane in the

Verge

(18

th

May), Mercedes

batteries for the home are functionally the same as those

from Tesla (Palo Alto, California), its most visible competitor

in this category and another car maker with an ambitious

side business. Both companies’ batteries let homeowners

store and save electricity generated by solar panels for use

around the clock.

But a small but important di erence provides prospective

customers with a choice. As described by Mr O’Kane, Tesla’s

$5,500 Powerwall 2 has a capacity of 13.5 kilowatt-hours

(kWh). The Mercedes home battery has a smaller capacity of

2.5kWh.

O setting this, Vivint’s o erings will be cheaper than Tesla’s.

The company plans to sell a basic 2.5kWh package for $5,000

for pairing with solar panels; while the complete 20kWh

system will run around $13,000, including installation.

A USA investigation into Fiat Chrysler

emissions controls raises the question of

what constitutes a ‘defeat device’

A civil complaint, led on 23

rd

May in Detroit, is the formal

accusation by the US Department of Justice (DoJ) that

Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (FCA) tted defeat devices to

some of its vehicles. It follows the noti cation in January

of an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) probe of the

Italian-American company’s compliance with the Clean Air Act

in the USA. Since then, other countries, including the UK and

France, have also said they were investigating the car maker.

BBC

business correspondent Theo Leggett was asked just

how serious this is for Fiat Chrysler. (“US Accuses Fiat Chrysler

of Using ‘Defeat Devices,’” 23

rd

May). “It isn’t into Volkswagen

territory yet,” said Mr Leggett. “For a start, the number of

vehicles is much smaller. But there’s also the question of what

is, and what isn’t, a defeat device.” Volkswagen admitted it

could not both make its cars clean enough to pass emissions

tests and ensure their good performance on the road. So, wrote

Mr Leggett, “It designed a software tool to do just that.”

Fiat Chrysler has been accused of tting software to its cars –

not disclosed to regulators – enabling the vehicles to produce

lower emissions during roadworthiness tests than they did when

under normal driving conditions.