Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  89 / 96 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 89 / 96 Next Page
Page Background

AR T I C L E

Advanced Machine Engineering

www.read-tpt.com

MARCH 2017

87

Advanced Machine & Engineering

Rockford, IL, USA

Email:

info@ame.com

Website:

www.ame.com

Since the arc length (

S

) is a very small value compared

to the blade radius (

r

) it can be assumed that the linear

displacement and arc length (

S

) is the same and the following

equation can be used.

S=θ. r

where: S: Arc length (m),

θ: Angular displacement (rad)

The backlash for the gearbox is designed with a range of

0.030° to 0.047°. This is the total backlash of the gearbox

reflected to the spindle. The backlash was 0.035°, which is

within the expected total backlash range.

The measured values are shown in the graph. The X axis

expresses the gradual increase of the torque calculated by

multiplying the forces obtained by increasing the hydraulic

pressure in the cylinder with the radius of the blade where the

force is applied. The Y axis shows the angular displacement

of the carbide tooth on the blade, representing the actual wind

up of the gear train (in degrees).

The slope of this line is the compliance and the stiffness is

the reciprocal of this value. Any unevenness of such a graph

would show a problem within the gear train.

To make a sanity check the torsional compliance of the single

transmission shafts was analysed with FEA.The compliance

has been reflected to the blade spindle and compared to the

measurement.

To simplify the complexity of a system, simple models can be

created by reducing mechanical quantities such as stiffness,

inertia or damping to one shaft. The reduced system is

equivalent to the original system from an energy point of view.

COMPLIANCE CALCULATIONS

AXES

Torque

[Nm]

Circumferential

deformation

[mm]

Radius

[mm]

Angular

deformation

[rad]

Compliance

[rad/Nm]

Gear ratio

[1]

Compliance ref to spindle axis

Compl./Gear Ratio

2

[rad/Nm]

CL# Spindle

11.2985

1.52E-04

61.976 2.46E-06

2.18E-07

1

2.17641E-07

C#3

11.2985

2.54E-04

83.16

3.05E-06

2.70E-07

1.367

1.44665E-07

C#2

11.2985

6.20E-04

52.324 1.18E-05

1.05E-06

8.014

1.63231E-08

C#1 Input

11.2985

8.89E-04

40.005 2.22E-05

1.97E-06

24.966

3.1555E-09

TOTAL

3.81785E-07

TOTAL STIFFNESS

[Nm/rad]

2.62E+06

Figure 3: Compliance measurement

The potential energy

E

stored in a shaft with the torsional

stiffness

c

can be calculated with the acting torque

M

and the

twisting angle φ.

E

= 1

M

φ = 1

c

φ

2

2

2

Since the energy stored in a shaft has to be the same as the

reduced one:

E

= 1

c

an

φ

an

2

= 1

c

an, red

φ

ab

2

2

2

With

φ

an

/ φ

ab

=

i

being the gear ratio.

c

an, red

=

i

2

c

an

When reducing the stiffness to a slow running shaft such as

the saw blade spindle and |i|>1 then

c

an, red

>

c

an

The complete gear train is essentially a series connection of

shafts in which the total stiffness is

c

ges

1/(1/c1+1/c2+….). 1/c

is equal to the compliance, which can be easily added up and

expressed as the reciprocal at the end.

Conclusion

Compliance data could also help solving problems in the field.

If a head is acting up in the field or if the tool life suddenly

drops, a compliance test can easily be conducted at the

machine. The graph can be compared to the original graph

and the irregularity will give indications of the problems.

Every carbide saw has a certain compliance. This compliance

must be held low to obtain an acceptable tool life. However,

decreasing compliance will increase the machine cost by

making the machine stiffer. The secret is to find the golden

balance resulting in the most cost-efficient carbide saw.

Figure 4: Theoretical calculation of the gear train stiffness