Previous Page  28 / 56 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 28 / 56 Next Page
Page Background

82

JCPSLP

Volume 14, Number 2 2012

Journal of Clinical Practice in Speech-Language Pathology

that KWS&G (Australia) can give our clients a “voice”,

empowering them and their significant communication

partners and, thus, opening many doors of communication.

Indeed, the team also looks forward to the possibility of

developing KWS&G (Singapore) in the near future to better

meet the diverse culture of our local context.

References

Bloomberg, K., West, D., Johnson, H., & Iacono. (2009).

The Triple C: Checklist of communication competencies

.

Box Hill, Vic.: SCOPE.

Bondy, A. S., & Frost, L. A. (1994). The Picture Exchange

Communication System.

Focus on Autism and Other

Developmental Disabilities

,

9

(3), 1–19.

Bradshaw, J. (2001). Complexity of staff communication

and reported level of understanding skills in adults with

intellectual disabilities.

Journal of Intellectual Disabilities

,

45

,

233–243.

Cress, C., & Marvin, C. (2003). Common questions about

AAC services in early intervention.

AAC: Augmentative &

Alternative Communication

,

19

(4), 254–272.

Johnson, H., Douglas, J., Bigby, C., & Iacono, T. (2009).

Maximizing community inclusion through mainstream

communication for adults with severe disabilities.

International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

,

11

(3),

180–190.

Lodge-Miller, K. A., & Elfenbein, J. L. (1994). Beginning

signer’s self-assessment of sign language skills.

Journal of

Communication Disorders

,

27

, 281–292.

Loh, E.W-L., & Singh, R. (2011, June).

Sharing of a

journey towards developing and implementing a common

signing approach within an organisation for persons with

intellectual disabilities in Singapore

. Paper presented at

the Diversity and Development 2011 Speech Pathology

Australia National Conference, Darwin.

The Makaton Charity. (2012). Makaton: The Makaton

Charity website. Retrieved from

http://www.makaton.org/

international/international.htm

Morton-Cooper, A. (2000).

Action research in health care

.

Oxford: Blackwell Science.

Powell, G., & Clibbens, J. (1994). Actions speak louder

than words: Signing and speech intelligibility in adults with

Down’s syndrome.

Down syndrome: Research & Practice

,

2

(3), 127–129.

Scope. (2010). Singapore signs on.

Horizon Newsletter

,

Issue 100, 26.

Spragale, D. M., & Micucci, D. (1990). Signs of the

week: A functional approach to manual sign training.

AAC:

Augmentative & Alternative Communication

,

6

(1), 29–37.

Post-pilot study questionnaire results

When asked to list observable changes in the child’s

communication since the beginning of the project, one third

of the parents reported that their child now used KWS&G to

express themselves. Moreover, half of the teachers’

responses indicated that they noticed improvement in their

students’ expressive communication using signs and

speech. Some teachers also reported that they were better

able to understand their students, suggesting fewer

instances of communication breakdowns.

More than half of the parents indicated that they felt

KWS&G was useful, particularly in helping them and

their child to communicate, as well as fostering a better

relationship between the parent and child. The parents also

reported positive feelings (e.g., confidence, being happy,

and proud of oneself being able to use KWS&G).

Similarly, teachers’ reported views about using KWS&G

after the training were positive. In particular, the teachers:

felt that KWS&G was useful as it offered an alternative

way for communication with their students;

felt that using KWS&G was effective in communicating

with their students;

reported being confident in using KWS&G after the

training.

In contrast, some teachers reported of instances where

they confused KWS&G with other types of signing (due to

previous exposure/learning) or forgot to use KWS&G in their

interactions with their students.

Summary and conclusion

The questionnaire findings indicated a general positive

attitude and perception of parents and teachers towards

the use of KWS&G as a communication approach. After

receiving a series of training sessions, both parents and

teacher groups appeared to use KWS&G more confidently

when communicating with their child/students, and found

the approach to be a useful AAC.

The findings from the pilot study and concurrent initiatives

taking place at the school suggest that a supportive

signing environment is important in helping colleagues

and the clients we work with to value and believe in the

significance of the KWS&G as a communication approach.

Such supportive measures may include introducing signs

at assembly for clients and staff, having a sign of the

week (Spragale & Micucci, 1990) within the workplace

and, perhaps, through use of various mediums including

posters, multimedia, and various visual reminders. Indeed,

receiving training for a start is also essential in order for

staff (as communication partners) to be acquainted with the

appropriate knowledge and skills to be able to use KWS&G

effectively with clients.

Unfortunately, the methodology employed in the current

study does not allow for any firm conclusions to be

drawn from the findings. It is also not clear if the positive

attitude of the staff at the school that was involved in this

pilot project reflects those of personnel in the other three

schools within MINDS, and/or of other special education

schools in Singapore.

Despite its obvious limitations, the findings from this pilot

project have been encouraging. Currently, the KWS&G

Project Team is looking into the next steps of realising

the implementation of KWS&G as a common signing

approach across the MINDS organisation. The project

team looks forward to KWS&G being embraced as a total

communication approach/practice to be used among all

staff, clients, and their families/caregivers. While it is an

interim measure, the team truly believes and advocates

Eva Loh

has been working as a speech therapist in the disability

sector in Singapore since she first graduated from The University

of Queensland, Australia, in 2003. She was recognised to be

Singapore’s first qualified Key Word Sign and Gesture Presenter in

2009, and was the Principal Investigator for the MINDS Key Word

Sign and Gesture Project Pilot Study from 2010–2011. Eva also

runs her own private practice.

Correspondence to:

Eva Wei-Lyn Loh

Speech-language therapist

Movement for the Intellectually Disabled of Singapore

MINDSville@Napiri

7 Lorong Napiri, Singapore 547533

phone: +65 6387 7662

email:

evaloh.mv@minds.org.sg