Previous Page  147 / 162 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 147 / 162 Next Page
Page Background

145

7

The effect of perimodiolar placement on speech perception and frequency discrimination by cochlear implant users.

Acta Otolaryngol

200

7;127:378-383.

Friesen LM, Shannon RV, Baskent D, Wang X: Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison

of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.

J Acoust Soc Am 2001

;110:1150-1163.

Frijns JH, Briaire JJ, de Laat JA, Grote JJ: Initial evaluation of the Clarion CII cochlear implant: speech perception and neural response

imaging.

Ear Hear 2002

;23:184-197.

Frijns JH, Briaire JJ, Grote JJ: The importance of human cochlear anatomy for the results of modiolus-hugging multichannel cochlear

implants.

Otol Neurotol 2001

;22:340-349.

Frijns JH, Klop WM, Bonnet RM, Briaire JJ: Optimizing the number of electrodes with high- rate stimulation of the clarion CII cochlear

implant.

Acta Otolaryngol 2003

;123:138-142.

Holden LK, Finley CC, Firszt JB, Holden TA, Brenner C, Potts LG, Gotter BD, Vanderhoof SS, Mispagel K, Heydebrand G, Skinner

MW: Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants.

Ear Hear 2013

;34:342-360.

Holden LK, Reeder RM, Firszt JB, Finley CC: Optimizing the perception of soft speech and speech in noise with the Advanced Bionics

cochlear implant system.

Int J Audiol 2011

.

Hughes ML, Abbas PJ: Electrophysiologic channel interaction, electrode pitch ranking, and behavioral threshold in straight versus

perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode arrays.

J Acoust Soc Am 2006

;119:1538-1547.

Hughes ML, Stille LJ: Effect of stimulus and recording parameters on spatial spread of excitation and masking patterns obtained with the

electrically evoked compound action potential in cochlear implants.

Ear Hear 2010

;31:679-692.

McDermott HJ: Music perception with cochlear implants: a review.

Trends Amplif 2004

;8:49- 82.

Mens LH, Boyle PJ, Mulder JJ: The Clarion Electrode positioner: approximation to the medial wall and current focussing? Audiol

Neurootol 2003

;8:166-175.

Mosnier I, Marx M, Venail F, Loundon N, Roux-Vaillard S, Sterkers O: Benefits from upgrade to the CP810 sound processor for Nucleus

24 cochlear implant recipients.

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2014

;271:49-57.

Nelson DA, Donaldson GS, Kreft H: Forward-masked spatial tuning curves in cochlear implant users.

J Acoust Soc Am 2008

;123:1522-

1543.

Pasanisi E, Vincenti V, Bacciu A, Guida M, Bacciu S: The nucleus contour electrode array: an electrophysiological study.

Laryngoscope

2002

;112:1653-1656.

Pfingst BE, Xu L, Thompson CS: Across-site threshold variation in cochlear implants: relation to speech recognition.

Audiol Neurootol

2004

;9:341-352.

Razza S, Albanese G, Ermoli L, Zaccone M, Cristofari E: Assessment of directionality performances: comparison between Freedom and

CP810 sound processors.

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013

;149:608-613.

Richter B, Aschendorff A, Lohnstein P, Husstedt H, Nagursky H, Laszig R: Clarion 1.2 standard electrode array with partial space-filling

positioner: radiological and histological evaluation in human temporal bones.

J Laryngol Otol 2002

;116:507-513.

Ricketts TA, Grantham DW, Ashmead DH, Haynes DS, Labadie RF: Speech recognition for unilateral and bilateral cochlear implant

modes in the presence of uncorrelated noise sources.

Ear Hear 2006;

27:763-773.

Roland JT, Jr., Fishman AJ, Alexiades G, Cohen NL: Electrode to modiolus proximity: a fluoroscopic and histologic analysis.

Am J Otol

2000

;21:218-225.

Saunders E, Cohen L, Aschendorff A, Shapiro W, Knight M, Stecker M, Richter B, Waltzman S, Tykocinski M, Roland T, Laszig R,