Previous Page  113 / 294 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 113 / 294 Next Page
Page Background

Arguments against non-entry

If Ireland should remain outside the Common Mar-

ket the arguments of the Unionist majority in the North

will be further strengthened. T h e other question is then,

whether we can survive alone. Ou r close economic ties

with England cannot be dismissed. Associate member-

ship could, according to some, guarantee us some of the

advantages of full membership but it is doubtful

whether we would be allowed to avail of the free

movement of labour under an association. It is also

argued that we would be better off without it, because

it would result in a national takeover of our economy

by German and French capital. Yet the right of estab-

lishment of persons and corporations of one country in

another could be more effectively controlled under full

membership. We will then get protection for such indus-

tries as are vital to our national identity. Further, the

free movement of labour is not a one-way traffic. Ireland

has exported people to every corner of the globe and

the longest single benefactor in modern times has been

England. T h e recent economic crisis has been put down

to a falling off in emigration, and if we were to go it

alone, what guarantee would we have that our unique,

position with regard to that country would remain.

Some may say that in an associated position we could

retain this relationship, but this is doubtful.

Th e dogmas of the past were indeed noble, the estab-

lishment of a sovereign, independent, democratic state

was a priority men died for. But this is a time in which

the world is changing and international co-operation

rather than rivalry has become part of modern political

thinking. Should we therefore, at a turning point in

European history, as nations which have traditionally

been enemies and are now joining together to strengthen

the safeguards of peace and liberty by combining re-

sources in a European Economic Community remain

rigid in our principles of sovereignty, independence and

nationalism that have been the root cause of wars,

injustices and atrocities for generations, or rather should

we go into Europe and establish ourselves as a nation

dedicated to the abolition of the very reasons that have

causcd those wars. We do not forfeit our identity by

doing this, rather do we stand to gain recognition as

part of the second-longest trading block in the world.

We established ourselves as a nation in the United

Nations, we have sent peace-keeping forces to troubled

parts of the world and Irish emigrants have reached

the highest offices in nearly every country in the world.

Let us now therefore establish ourselves in Europe

where the talents of Irishmen, which formerly were

directed to the building of other nations can now be

directed to the building of a Europe in which Ireland

can take her place, not in isolation, but in unity.

Mr. Michael O ' Ke nn e dy, Parliamentary Secretary to

the Minister for Education, pointed out that, after the

effects of the war, the small nations of Europe banded

together to form an economic union before a political

union. In Ireland the areas of common interest are

mainly economic on both sides of the Border, hut even-

tual unification was the only practical solution. Ou r

voice alone is ineffective to overcome the objections of

the great powers, but, by associating with other small

nations, we can make our voice felt.

Mr . Seán MacBride, S.C., said it was essential for us to

enter the Common Market in order to excape the

economic and financial stranglehold of the Bank of

England. We should not hesitate in our choice if econ-

omic policies were going to he framed in future by the

European Commission instead of the British Treasury.

Full membership will undoubtedly help to achieve

European unity. We have tried in vain to maintain our

individuality against the ravages of Anglo-American

culture, and we must in future he European-minded.

Dr. Conor Cruise O'Brien, T.D., said that the Common

Market might exercise a benign effect. Before the British

initiative is announced, it is necessary for us to under-

take the following steps : A declaration subscribed to by

the three parties spelling out in detail the desiderata of

the majority as well as those of the Ulster Unionists.

This should he binding with all sincerity on all. The

Republic should not be used as a base of attack upon

the authorities of Northern Ireland. We should he will-

ing to see that our laws can no longer he construed as

sectarian; and changes in contraception and divorce

laws would influence Protestants. It is absolutely essen-

tial for us to grant concessions if a genuine dialogue is

to take place. To deny a first reading to a Bill facili-

tating contraception by medical prescription was a

grievous error by the Government. It was essential that

any constitutional changes should he framed on an all-

party basis and particularly that any idea of unification

should he preceded by trust and understanding.

The Chief Justice,

who presided, thanked the Auditor

and the speakers for an interesting evening.

Books and Journals relating to the European

Community in the Library

(1) Common Ma r k et Law Reports. From Volume 1

(1962) continuous.

(2) Common Ma r k et Law Review. From Volume 1

(1963).

(3) Campbell: Common Ma r k et Law. 2 vols., 1970.

(4) Valentine: The Court of Justice of the European

Communities. 2 vols., 1965.

(5) Honig. Brown, Gleiss and Hirsch: T h e Cartel L aw

of the European Economic Community. 1963.

(6) Bebr: Judicial Control of the European Commu-

nities. 1962.

(7) Brinkhorst and Schermers: Casebook Relating to

Judicial Remedies in the European Community*

1969.

(8) Wall: The Court of Justice of the European Com-

munities. 1966.

(9) British Institute of International and Comparative

Law: Legal Problems of an Enlarged European

Community. 1972.

112